Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 9.61.250 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any offense committed by use of a telephone as set forth in RCW 9.61.230 may be deemed to have been committed either at the place from which the telephone call or calls were made or at the place where the telephone call or calls were received.

[ 1967 c 16 s 3.]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2018–2018 · leading case: Junzhi Shao v. City Of Kent (Wash. Ct. App. 2018).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Junzhi Shao v. City Of Kent (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). “75511-1-1)/10 First, as Feaster and Shao acknowledge, Washington courts have previously held that jurisdiction is proper where a communication is made or received in cases involving crimes that did not include a jurisdictional provision.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.