Wash. Rev. Code » Title 9 · Chapter 9.95
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 9.95.013 (2026)

Application of sentencing reform act to board decision

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The board shall apply all of the statutory requirements of RCW 9.95.009(2), requiring decisions of the board to be reasonably consistent with the ranges, standards, and purposes of the sentencing reform act, chapter 9.94A RCW, and the minimum term recommendations of the sentencing judge and the prosecuting attorney, to every person who, on July 23, 1989, is incarcerated and has been adjudged under the provisions of RCW 9.92.090.
[ 1989 c 259 s 5.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1991–2008 · leading case: In Re Ecklund, 985 P.2d 342 (Wash. 1999).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Ecklund, 985 P.2d 342 (Wash. 1999). · cites it 3× “009(2); RCW 9.95.013; see also Addleman v. Board of Prison Terms & Paroles, 107 Wash.”
In re the Pers. Restraint of Dyer, 143 Wash. 2d 384 (Wash. 2001). “RCW 9.95.013 (requiring decisions of the board to be reasonably consistent with the ranges, standards, and purposes of the SRA).”
In Re Dyer, 20 P.3d 907 (Wash. 2001). “RCW 9.95.013 (requiring decisions of the board to be reasonably consistent with the ranges, standards, and purposes of the SRA).”
In re the Pers. Restraint of Eckmann, 818 P.2d 1350 (Wash. 1991). · cites it 10× “53 In October 1989, the Board reviewed Petitioner Blye's habitual criminal mandatory minimum term pursuant to RCW 9.95.013. The Board considered the reports of his institutional conduct and the number and nature of his crimes, and declined to waive his mandatory minimum term.”
In re the Pers. Restraint of Ecklund, 139 Wash. 2d 166 (Wash. 1999). · cites it 2× “ISRB must give adequate written reasons when imposing exceptional sentence When setting minimum terms and determining parole, the ISRB must make decisions which are “reasonably consistent” with the “ranges, standards, purposes, and recommendations” of the Sentencing Reform Act…”
In Re Pers. Restraint of Dyer, 189 P.3d 759 (Wash. 2008). “" RCW 9.95.013; see also RCW 9.95.009(2). The ISRB "shall not, however, until his or her maximum term expires, release a prisoner, unless in its opinion his or her rehabilitation has been complete and he or she is a fit subject for release.”
In re the Pers. Restraint of Dyer, 164 Wash. 2d 274 (Wash. 2008). “” RCW 9.95.013, .009(2). The ISRB “shall not, however, until his or her maximum term expires, release a prisoner, unless in its opinion his or her rehabilitation has been complete and he or she is a fit subject for release.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.