Wash. Rev. Code » Title 9 · Chapter 9.95
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 9.95.063 (2025)

Conviction upon new trial—Former imprisonment deductible

✓ laws through the 2025 session: 2026 session laws are not yet included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
If a defendant who has been imprisoned during the pendency of any posttrial proceeding in any state or federal court shall be again convicted upon a new trial resulting from any such proceeding, the period of his or her former imprisonment shall be deducted by the superior court from the period of imprisonment to be fixed on the last verdict of conviction.
[ 2011 c 336 s 339; 1971 ex.s. c 86 s 1; 1971 c 81 s 47; 1955 c 42 s 4. Prior: 1893 c 61 s 34; RRS s 1750. Formerly RCW 10.73.070, part.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1972–1984 · leading case: In re the Pers. Restraint of Quinlivan, 588 P.2d 1210 (Wash. Ct. App. 1978).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re the Pers. Restraint of Quinlivan, 588 P.2d 1210 (Wash. Ct. App. 1978). · cites it 6× “*241 Two issues are raised in his petition: (1) whether such credit is constitutionally required under the state and federal provisions of due process, equal protection and the prohibition against multiple punishments, and (2) whether any credit is required under RCW 9.95.063 as…”
Reanier v. Smith, 517 P.2d 949 (Wash. 1974). · cites it 2× “062 8 and RCW 9.95.063, 9 provide for detention credit pending the appeal of' a conviction as well as credit for time served prior to a resentencing where a new trial has been granted.”
In Re the Pers. Restraint of Knapp, 687 P.2d 1145 (Wash. 1984). “062 and RCW 9.95.063, provide for detention credit pending the appeal of a conviction as well as credit for time served prior to a *470 resentencing where a new trial has been granted.”
State v. Hadsell, 497 P.2d 254 (Wash. Ct. App. 1972). “See also RCW 9.95.063. We therefore remand the January 15, 1971, judgment and sentence to the King County Superior Court for modification to reflect specifically credit for the time defendant served between the November 18, 1969, judgment and the January 15, 1971, judgment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.