Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 9.95.064 (2026)
Conditions of release
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) In order to minimize the trauma to the victim, the court may attach conditions on release of an offender under RCW 9.95.062, convicted of a crime committed before July 1, 1984, regarding the whereabouts of the defendant, contact with the victim, or other conditions.
Notes:
Intent—Application—Application of repealers—Effective date—2008 c 231: See notes following RCW 9.94A.701.
Severability—2008 c 231: See note following RCW 9.94A.500.
Intent—Severability—Effective dates—2001 2nd sp.s. c 12: See notes following RCW 71.09.250.
Application—2001 2nd sp.s. c 12 ss 301-363: See note following RCW 9.94A.030.
Severability—1989 c 276: See note following RCW 9.95.062.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1997–2023 · leading case: State v. Swiger, 149 P.3d 372 (Wash. 2006).
State v. Swiger, 149 P.3d 372 (Wash. 2006). “RCW 9.95.064. If the conditions of release amount to “home detention” under RCW 9.”
State v. Swiger, 149 P.3d 372 (Wash. 2006). “RCW 9.95.064. If the conditions of release amount to "home detention" under RCW 9.”
State v. Anderson, 937 P.2d 581 (Wash. 1997). “Such conditions are explicitly authorized by RCW 9.95.064, which states: In order to minimize the trauma to the victim, the court may attach conditions on release of a defendant under RCW 9.”
State v. Nelson, 281 P.3d 321 (Wash. Ct. App. 2012). “Moreover, the law then in effect also required offenders to comply with all conditions of community placement, including department preapproval of an offender’s postrelease address and living situation.”
State Of Washington, V. Christopher Lee Shelley, 496 P.3d 310 (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “2d at 227 (citing RCW 9.95.064). “If the conditions of release amount to ‘home detention’ under RCW 9.”
State v. Anderson, 937 P.2d 581 (Wash. 1997). “Such conditions are explicitly authorized by RCW 9.95.064, which states: In order to minimize the trauma to the victim, the court may attach conditions on release of a defendant under RCW 9.”
State of Washington v. Mechel N. Frederick (Wash. Ct. App. 2022). “” RCW 9.95.064(2).1 The Board “may not impose conditions that are contrary to those ordered by the court” or “contravene or decrease court-imposed conditions.”
In the Matter of the Pers. Restraint of: Eric R. Lewis (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). “RCW 9.95.064(2). The ISRB may not impose conditions contrary to those ordered by the court and may not contravene or decrease court-imposed conditions.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 9.95.064(2) — 2 cases
State of Washington v. Mechel N. Frederick (Wash. Ct. App. 2022). “” RCW 9.95.064(2).1 The Board “may not impose conditions that are contrary to those ordered by the court” or “contravene or decrease court-imposed conditions.”
In the Matter of the Pers. Restraint of: Eric R. Lewis (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). “RCW 9.95.064(2). The ISRB may not impose conditions contrary to those ordered by the court and may not contravene or decrease court-imposed conditions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.