Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 9A.46.030 (2026)

Place where committed

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any harassment offense committed as set forth in RCW 9A.46.020 or 9A.46.110 may be deemed to have been committed where the conduct occurred or at the place from which the threat or threats were made or at the place where the threats were received.

[ 1992 c 186 s 3; 1985 c 288 s 3.]

Notes:

Severability—1992 c 186: See note following RCW 9A.46.110.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1994–2018 · leading case: State v. Alvarez, 872 P.2d 1123 (Wash. Ct. App. 1994).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State v. Alvarez, 872 P.2d 1123 (Wash. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “In harmony with our construction, RCW 9A.46.030 refers to "threat” in the singular: Any harassment offense committed as set forth in RCW 9A.”

State v. Morales, 298 P.3d 791 (Wash. Ct. App. 2013). “RCW 9A.46.030, quoted in 74 Wn. App. at 259 .”

State v. J.M., 6 P.3d 607 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000). “Such legislative awareness is evidenced by another section of the act, RCW 9A.46.030, which provides that any harassment offense committed as set forth in 9A.”

Junzhi Shao v. City Of Kent (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). “For example, State v. Dent involved conspiracy to commit first degree murder.”

State of Washington v. Jesus Vidales Morales (Wash. Ct. App. 2013). “RCW 9A.46.030, quoted in 74 Wn. App. at 259 .”

State v. JM, 6 P.3d 607 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000). “Such legislative awareness is evidenced by another section of the Act, RCW 9A.46.030, which provides that any harassment offense committed as set forth in 9A.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.