Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 9A.46.080 (2026)
Order restricting contact—Violation
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The victim shall be informed by local law enforcement agencies or the prosecuting attorney of the final disposition of the case in which the victim is involved. If a defendant is found guilty of a crime of harassment and a condition of the sentence restricts the defendant's ability to have contact with the victim or witnesses, the condition shall be recorded and a written certified copy of that order shall be provided to the victim or witnesses by the clerk of the court. Willful violation of a court order issued under this section or an equivalent local ordinance is a gross misdemeanor. The written order shall contain the court's directives and shall bear the legend: Violation of this order is a criminal offense under chapter 9A.46 RCW and will subject a violator to arrest.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2000–2023 · leading case: State v. Wadsworth, 991 P.2d 80 (Wash. 2000).
State v. Wadsworth, 991 P.2d 80 (Wash. 2000). “110; RCW 9A.46.080. [68] Id. [69] See generally State v.”
State v. Wadsworth, 139 Wash. 2d 724 (Wash. 2000). “110; RCW 9A.46.080. Id. See generally State v.”
State v. Wilson, 136 Wash. App. 596 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007). “021), violation of a no-contact order (RCW 9A.46.080), and assault in violation of a no-contact order (RCW 26-.”
State v. Wilson, 150 P.3d 144 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007). “021), violation of a no-contact order (RCW 9A.46.080), and assault in violation of a no-contact order (RCW 26.”
In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Lopez, 153 Wash. 2d 570 (Wash. 2005). “” To resolve any disagreement as to the rules governing “other pending matters,” “[t]he hearing officer or panel chair assigned to hear a matter, or the Chair in a matter pending before the Board, may rule on the appropriate procedure with a view to insuring a fair and orderly…”
In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Lopez, 106 P.3d 221 (Wash. 2005). “" To resolve any disagreement as to the rules governing "other pending matters," "[t]he hearing officer or panel chair assigned to hear a matter, or the Chair in a matter pending before the Board, may rule on the appropriate procedure with a view to insuring a fair and orderly…”
State v. Arthur, 126 Wash. App. 243 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005). “The citation charged that Arthur violated RCW 9A.46.080 and RCW 9A.76.040, neither of these statutes is listed in RCW 26.”
Roman Busev v. William Barr (9th Cir. 2019). “110(1) for coming within ten feet of his brother and for going to his mother’s residence.”
State v. Arthur, 108 P.3d 169 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005). “The citation charged that Arthur violated RCW 9A.46.080 and RCW 9A.76.040, neither of these statutes is listed in RCW 26.”
State of Washington v. Frank James Willing, Jr. (Wash. Ct. App. 2020). “1 RCW 9A.46.080. A home or residence constitutes where one normally lives and a valid protection order need not list the protected party’s address.”
State Of Washington, Resp/cross-appellant V. Kyle Randall Wheeler, App/cross-respondent (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). “RCW 9A.46.080 provides “If a defendant is found guilty of a crime of harassment and a condition of the sentence restricts the defendant’s ability to have contact with the victim or witnesses, the condition shall be recorded and a written certified copy of that order shall be…”
State of Washington v. Roman S. Busev (Wash. Ct. App. 2015). “Stinton on the ground that violating a no- contact order is a crime, RCW 9A.46.080, whereas violating a community custody condition is not a criminal offense.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.