West Virginia Code

W. Va. Code § 27-5-3 (2026)

Admission under involuntary hospitalization for examination; hearing; release

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WV-LEGwvlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
ARTICLE 5. INVOLUNTARY HOSPITALIZATION.

§27-5-3. Admission under involuntary hospitalization for examination; hearing; release.

(a) Admission to a mental health facility for examination. — An individual shall be admitted to a mental health facility for examination and treatment upon entry of an order finding probable cause as provided in §27-5-2 of this code. Upon certification by a physician, psychologist, licensed professional counselor, licensed independent clinical social worker practicing in compliance with the provisions of §30-30-1 et seq. of this code, an advanced nurse practitioner with psychiatric certification practicing in compliance with §30-7-1 et seq. of this code, or a physician’s assistant practicing in compliance with §30-3E-1 et seq. of this code with advanced duties in psychiatric medicine that he or she has examined the individual and is of the opinion that the individual is mentally ill or has a substance use disorder and, because of the mental illness or substance use disorder, is likely to cause serious harm to himself, herself, or to others if not immediately restrained and treated: Provided, That the opinions offered by an independent clinical social worker, an advanced nurse practitioner with psychiatric certification, or a physician assistant with advanced duties in psychiatric medicine shall be within his or her particular areas of expertise, as recognized by the order of the authorizing court.

(b) Three-day time limitation on examination. — If the examination does not take place within three days from the date the individual is taken into custody, the individual shall be released. If the examination reveals that the individual is not mentally ill or has a substance use disorder, the individual shall be released.

(c) Three-day time limitation on certification. — The certification required in §27-5-3(a) of this code is valid for three days. Any individual with respect to whom the certification has been issued may not be admitted on the basis of the certification at any time after the expiration of three days from the date of the examination.

(d) Findings and conclusions required for certification. — A certification under this section shall include findings and conclusions of the mental examination, the date, time, and place of the examination, and the facts upon which the conclusion that involuntary commitment is necessary is based, including facts that less restrictive interventions and placements were considered but are not appropriate and available and that the risks and benefits were explained as required by §27-5-1(i) of this code.

(e) Notice requirements. — When an individual is admitted to a mental health facility or a state hospital pursuant to the provisions of this section, the chief medical officer of the facility shall immediately give notice of the individual’s admission to the individual’s spouse, if any, and one of the individual’s parents or guardians or if there is no spouse and are no parents or guardians, to one of the individual’s adult next of kin if the next of kin is not the applicant. Notice shall also be given to the community mental health facility, if any, having jurisdiction in the county of the individual’s residence. The notices other than to the community mental health facility shall be in writing and shall be transmitted to the person or persons at his, her, or their last known address by certified mail, return receipt requested.

(f) Three-day time limitation for examination and certification at mental health facility or state hospital. — After the individual’s admission to a mental health facility or state hospital, he or she may not be detained more than three days, excluding Sundays and holidays, unless, within the three-day period, the individual is examined by a staff physician and the physician certifies that in his or her opinion the patient is not suffering from a physical ailment manifesting behaviors which mimic mental illness but is mentally ill or has a substance use disorder and is likely to injure himself, herself, or others and requires continued commitment and treatment. If the staff physician determines that the individual does not meet the criteria for continued commitment, that the individual can be treated in an available outpatient community-based treatment program and poses no present danger to himself, herself or others, or that the individual has an underlying medical issue or issues that resulted in a determination that the individual should not have been committed, the staff physician shall release and discharge the individual as appropriate as soon as practicable.

(g) Twenty-day time limitation for institution of final commitment proceedings. — If, in the opinion of the examining physician, the patient is mentally ill or has a substance use disorder and because of the mental illness or substance use disorder is likely to injure himself, herself, or others if allowed to be at liberty, the chief medical officer shall, within 20 calendar days from the date of admission, institute final commitment proceedings as provided in §27-5-4 of this code. If the proceedings are not instituted within the 20-day period absent good cause, the individual shall be immediately released. After the request for hearing is filed, the hearing may not be canceled on the basis that the individual has become a voluntary patient unless the mental hygiene commissioner concurs in the motion for cancellation of the hearing.

(h) Thirty-five day time limitation for conclusion of all proceedings. — If all proceedings as provided in §27-3-1 et seq. and §27-4-1 et seq. of this code are not completed within 35 days from the date of filing the Application for Involuntary Custody for Mental Health Examination, the individual shall be immediately released.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1979–2022 · leading case: Riffe v. Armstrong, 477 S.E.2d 535 (W. Va. 1996).
Riffe v. Armstrong, 477 S.E.2d 535 (W. Va. 1996). · cites it 12× “That authority arises under the provisions of W.Va.Code § 27-5-3(a) (1979), which provides for admission to a mental health facility following a probable cause hearing, and W.”
Jill C. Barber v. Camden Clark Mem'l Hosp. Corp., 815 S.E.2d 474 (W. Va. 2018). · cites it 2× “(b) Confidential information shall not be disclosed, except: 3 (1) In a proceeding under section four [§ 27-5-4], article five of this chapter to disclose the results of an involuntary examination made pursuant to section two [§ 27-5-2], three [§ 27-5-3] or four [§ 27-5-4] of…”
In Re: Involuntary Hospitalization of T.O., 796 S.E.2d 564 (W. Va. 2017). “He opined that “[i]mmediate hospitalization in a 24-hour locked facility needed[,]” and recommended the petitioner “be committed for further evaluation pursuant to [West Virginia Code] § 27-5-3 [probable cause hearing only][.]” Later in the day of September 25, 2015, a hearing…”
Markey v. Wachtel, 264 S.E.2d 437 (W. Va. 1979). · cites it 2× “Such medical evidence obtained pursuant to an examination under this section, or section two or section three [§ 27-5-2 or § 27-5-3] of this article, is not privileged information for purposes of a hearing pursuant to this section.”
Roe v. Cnty. Comm'n of Monongalia Cnty., 926 F. Supp. 74 (N.D.W. Va. 1996). · cites it 2× “The defendants contend that he was provided the care and safekeeping, mandated by W.Va.Code § 27-5-3 in the same way that other persons with similar needs are treated, and was not denied access to any program or service.”
People v. Stevens, 761 P.2d 768 (Colo. 1988). “230(4) (1987); W.Va.Code § 27-5-3(a) (1986). See generally Hoffman & Foust, Least Restrictive Treatment of the Mentally Ill: A Doctrine in Search of Its Senses, 14 San Diego L.”
In Re: Involuntary Hospitalization of B.N. (W. Va. 2013). · cites it 7× “The mental health professional concluded that “[petitioner] should be committed for further evaluation pursuant to [West Virginia Code] § 27-5-3.”5 Less restrictive alternatives were not being attempted because: “P[atien]t not agreeable.”
Shepherd v. Attorney Gen. of the United States (N.D.W. Va. 2022). · cites it 2× “In support, Defendant indicates the June 8, 2014, probable cause order stated that he is to be “committed for treatment of mental illness,” and directed that Plaintiff “be further examined and treated as required under the provisions of West Virginia Code § 27-5-3, which…”
— W. Va. Code § 27-5-3(a) — 2 cases
Riffe v. Armstrong, 477 S.E.2d 535 (W. Va. 1996). “That authority arises under the provisions of W.Va.Code § 27-5-3(a) (1979), which provides for admission to a mental health facility following a probable cause hearing, and W.”
People v. Stevens, 761 P.2d 768 (Colo. 1988). “230(4) (1987); W.Va.Code § 27-5-3(a) (1986). See generally Hoffman & Foust, Least Restrictive Treatment of the Mentally Ill: A Doctrine in Search of Its Senses, 14 San Diego L.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.