§3-5-23. Certificate nominations; requirements and control; penalties.
(a) Groups of citizens having no party organization may nominate candidates who are not already candidates in the primary election for public office otherwise than by conventions or primary elections. In that case, the candidate or candidates, jointly or severally, shall file a nomination certificate in accordance with the provisions of this section and the provisions of §3-5-24 of this code.
(b) The person or persons soliciting or canvassing signatures of duly qualified voters on the certificate or certificates, may solicit or canvass duly registered voters residing within the county, district, or other political division represented by the office sought, but must first obtain from the clerk of the county commission credentials which must be exhibited to each voter canvassed or solicited, which credentials may be in the following form or effect:
State of West Virginia, County of ..................., ss:
This certifies that the holder of this credential is hereby authorized to solicit and canvass duly registered voters residing in .................... (here place the county, district or other political division represented by the office sought) to sign a certificate purporting to nominate ............................ (here place name of candidate heading list on certificate) for the office of ............................. and others, at the general election to be held on ........................., 20......
Given under my hand and the seal of my office this ................. day of ........................, 20......
.................................................
Clerk, county commission of ................... County.
The clerk of each county commission, upon proper application made as herein provided, shall issue such credentials and shall keep a record thereof.
(c) The certificate shall be personally signed by duly registered voters, in their own proper handwriting or by their marks duly witnessed, who must be residents within the county, district, or other political division represented by the office sought wherein the canvass or solicitation is made by the person or persons duly authorized. The signatures need not all be on one certificate. The number of signatures shall be equal to not less than one percent of the entire vote cast at the last preceding general election for the office in the state, district, county, or other political division for which the nomination is to be made, but in no event shall the number be less than 25. The number of signatures shall be equal to not less than one percent of the entire vote cast at the last preceding general election for any statewide, congressional, or presidential candidate, but in no event shall the number be less than 25. Where two or more nominations may be made for the same office, the total of the votes cast at the last preceding general election for the candidates receiving the highest number of votes on each ticket for the office shall constitute the entire vote. A signature on a certificate may not be counted unless it be that of a duly registered voter of the county, district, or other political division represented by the office sought wherein the certificate was presented.
(d) The certificates shall state the name and residence of each of the candidates; that he or she is legally qualified to hold the office; that the subscribers are legally qualified and duly registered as voters and desire to have the candidates placed on the ballot; and may designate, by not more than five words, a brief name of the party which the candidates represent and may adopt a device or emblem to be printed on the official ballot. All candidates nominated by the signing of the certificates shall have their names placed on the official ballot as candidates, as if otherwise nominated under the provisions of this chapter.
The Secretary of State shall prescribe the form and content of the nomination certificates to be used for soliciting signatures.
Offices to be filled by the voters of more than one county shall use separate petition forms for the signatures of qualified voters for each county.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this code to the contrary, a duly registered voter may sign the certificate provided in this section and may vote for candidates of his or her choosing in the corresponding primary election.
(e) The Secretary of State, or the clerk of the county commission, as the case may be, may investigate the validity of the certificates and the signatures thereon. If, upon investigation, there is doubt as to the legitimacy and the validity of certificate, the Secretary of State may ask the Attorney General of the state, or the clerk of the county commission may ask the prosecuting attorney of the county, to institute a quo warranto proceeding against the nominee by certificate to determine his or her right to the nomination to public office and upon request being made, the Attorney General or prosecuting attorney shall institute the quo warranto proceeding. The clerk of the county commission shall, at the request of the Secretary of State or the clerk of the circuit court, compare the information from any certificate to the county voter registration records in order to assist in determining the validity of any certificates.
(f) For the purposes of this section, any person who, at the time of the filing of the nomination certificate or certificates, is registered and affiliated with a recognized political party as defined in §3-1-8 of this code may not become a candidate for political office by virtue of the nomination-certificate process as set forth in this section.
(g) For the purposes of this section, any person who was a candidate for nomination by a recognized political party as defined in §3-1-8 of this code may not, after failing to win the nomination of his or her political party, become a candidate for the same political office by virtue of the nomination-certificate process as set forth in this section.
(h) In addition to penalties prescribed elsewhere for violation of this chapter, any person violating the provisions of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be fined not more than $1,000, or confined in jail not more than one year, or both fined and confined: Provided, That a criminal penalty may not be imposed upon anyone who signs a nomination certificate and votes in the primary election held after the date the certificate was signed.
Notes of Decisions
Erik Patrick Wells v. Charles T. Miller, Prosecuting Attorney, 791 S.E.2d 361 (W. Va. 2016).
· cites it 124× “7 W. Va. Code § 3-5-23 (a).7 The nominating certificate must state the name and residence of each of the candidates; that he or she is legally qualified to hold the office; that the subscribers are legally qualified and duly registered as voters and desire to have the candidates…”
West Virginia Libertarian Party v. Manchin, 270 S.E.2d 634 (W. Va. 1980).
· cites it 61× “A third challenge is made to the same statute on the basis of its requirement that persons circulating nominating petitions must reside in the same magisterial district as persons who sign the petitions.”
McClure v. Manchin, 301 F. Supp. 2d 564 (N.D.W. Va. 2003).
· cites it 76× “Because the WVLP’s candidate for governor did not poll at least one percent of the total number of votes cast for all candidates for governor in the 2000 election, the party and its candidates must follow the procedures enumerated by West Virginia Code sections 3-5-23 and 3-5-24…”
Socialist Workers Party v. Hechler, 696 F. Supp. 190 (S.D.W. Va 1988).
· cites it 24× “Political parties polling less than 10% of the total vote cast for governor at the immediately preceding general election may obtain access to the ballot by following the procedures outlined in § 3-5-23 for groups of citizens having no party organization or by nominating…”
SER Donald L. Blankenship v. Mac Warner, W. Va. Sec'y of State, 825 S.E.2d 309 (W. Va. 2018).
· cites it 46× “Code § 3-5-23 (2006), before the 2009 amendment, provided that "any person violating the provisions of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be fined not more than one thousand dollars, or confined in jail for not more than one year, or both.”
Hess v. Hechler, 925 F. Supp. 1140 (S.D.W. Va 1995).
· cites it 9× “W.Va.Code § 3-5-23 (1986). Declarations of candidacy must be filed and filing fees paid thirty days prior to the certificate filing deadline.”
Nader 2000 Primary Comm., Inc. v. Hechler, 112 F. Supp. 2d 575 (S.D.W. Va 2000).
· cites it 6× “Specifically, Plaintiffs claim that, first, the change in the signature requirement from one (1) percent to two (2) percent in the same election cycle is unreasonably onerous, violates a potential candidate’s First Amendment rights and is therefore unconstitutional.”
State ex rel. Browne v. Hechler, 476 S.E.2d 559 (W. Va. 1996).
· cites it 14× “The petitioners complain that the respondent has misinterpreted a proviso contained in W. Va.Code § 3-5-23(a) (1986). 1 *613 We agree with the petitioners and, therefore, grant a writ of mandamus compelling the respondent to accept the petitioners’ certificates.”
Fishbeck v. Hechler, 85 F.3d 162 (4th Cir. 1996).
· cites it 6× “W. Va. Code § 3-5-23 (a). 2 nominating petition from voting in the next primary election.”
Barr v. Ireland, 575 F. Supp. 2d 747 (S.D.W. Va 2008).
· cites it 4× “Regarding signatures submitted pursuant to section 3-5-23, the Elections Division date stamps, reviews, and counts the names as received.”
State Ex Rel. Alsop v. McCartney, 228 S.E.2d 278 (W. Va. 1976).
“Code 3-5-24 provides: “All certificates nominating candidates for office under the preceding section [§3-5-23], including a candidate for the office of presidential elector, shall be filed, in the case of a candidate to be voted for by the voters of the entire State or by any…”
W. Va. Code § 3-5-23(a): 8 cases
Socialist Workers Party v. Hechler, 696 F. Supp. 190 (S.D.W. Va 1988).
“Political parties polling less than 10% of the total vote cast for governor at the immediately preceding general election may obtain access to the ballot by following the procedures outlined in § 3-5-23 for groups of citizens having no party organization or by nominating…”
West Virginia Libertarian Party v. Manchin, 270 S.E.2d 634 (W. Va. 1980).
“A third challenge is made to the same statute on the basis of its requirement that persons circulating nominating petitions must reside in the same magisterial district as persons who sign the petitions.”
SER Donald L. Blankenship v. Mac Warner, W. Va. Sec'y of State, 825 S.E.2d 309 (W. Va. 2018).
“Code § 3-5-23 (2006), before the 2009 amendment, provided that "any person violating the provisions of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be fined not more than one thousand dollars, or confined in jail for not more than one year, or both.”
State ex rel. Browne v. Hechler, 476 S.E.2d 559 (W. Va. 1996).
“The petitioners complain that the respondent has misinterpreted a proviso contained in W. Va.Code § 3-5-23(a) (1986). 1 *613 We agree with the petitioners and, therefore, grant a writ of mandamus compelling the respondent to accept the petitioners’ certificates.”
Barr v. Ireland, 575 F. Supp. 2d 747 (S.D.W. Va 2008).
“Regarding signatures submitted pursuant to section 3-5-23, the Elections Division date stamps, reviews, and counts the names as received.”
W. Va. Code § 3-5-23(b): 4 cases
West Virginia Libertarian Party v. Manchin, 270 S.E.2d 634 (W. Va. 1980).
“A third challenge is made to the same statute on the basis of its requirement that persons circulating nominating petitions must reside in the same magisterial district as persons who sign the petitions.”
McClure v. Manchin, 301 F. Supp. 2d 564 (N.D.W. Va. 2003).
“Because the WVLP’s candidate for governor did not poll at least one percent of the total number of votes cast for all candidates for governor in the 2000 election, the party and its candidates must follow the procedures enumerated by West Virginia Code sections 3-5-23 and 3-5-24…”
Nader 2000 Primary Comm., Inc. v. Hechler, 112 F. Supp. 2d 575 (S.D.W. Va 2000).
“Specifically, Plaintiffs claim that, first, the change in the signature requirement from one (1) percent to two (2) percent in the same election cycle is unreasonably onerous, violates a potential candidate’s First Amendment rights and is therefore unconstitutional.”
Hess v. Hechler, 925 F. Supp. 1140 (S.D.W. Va 1995).
“W.Va.Code § 3-5-23 (1986). Declarations of candidacy must be filed and filing fees paid thirty days prior to the certificate filing deadline.”
W. Va. Code § 3-5-23(c): 7 cases
West Virginia Libertarian Party v. Manchin, 270 S.E.2d 634 (W. Va. 1980).
“A third challenge is made to the same statute on the basis of its requirement that persons circulating nominating petitions must reside in the same magisterial district as persons who sign the petitions.”
McClure v. Manchin, 301 F. Supp. 2d 564 (N.D.W. Va. 2003).
“Because the WVLP’s candidate for governor did not poll at least one percent of the total number of votes cast for all candidates for governor in the 2000 election, the party and its candidates must follow the procedures enumerated by West Virginia Code sections 3-5-23 and 3-5-24…”
Socialist Workers Party v. Hechler, 696 F. Supp. 190 (S.D.W. Va 1988).
“Political parties polling less than 10% of the total vote cast for governor at the immediately preceding general election may obtain access to the ballot by following the procedures outlined in § 3-5-23 for groups of citizens having no party organization or by nominating…”
Hess v. Hechler, 925 F. Supp. 1140 (S.D.W. Va 1995).
“W.Va.Code § 3-5-23 (1986). Declarations of candidacy must be filed and filing fees paid thirty days prior to the certificate filing deadline.”
Nader 2000 Primary Comm., Inc. v. Hechler, 112 F. Supp. 2d 575 (S.D.W. Va 2000).
“Specifically, Plaintiffs claim that, first, the change in the signature requirement from one (1) percent to two (2) percent in the same election cycle is unreasonably onerous, violates a potential candidate’s First Amendment rights and is therefore unconstitutional.”
W. Va. Code § 3-5-23(d): 3 cases
Socialist Workers Party v. Hechler, 696 F. Supp. 190 (S.D.W. Va 1988).
“Political parties polling less than 10% of the total vote cast for governor at the immediately preceding general election may obtain access to the ballot by following the procedures outlined in § 3-5-23 for groups of citizens having no party organization or by nominating…”
Erik Patrick Wells v. Charles T. Miller, Prosecuting Attorney, 791 S.E.2d 361 (W. Va. 2016).
“7 W. Va. Code § 3-5-23 (a).7 The nominating certificate must state the name and residence of each of the candidates; that he or she is legally qualified to hold the office; that the subscribers are legally qualified and duly registered as voters and desire to have the candidates…”
W. Va. Code § 3-5-23(e): 1 case
McClure v. Manchin, 301 F. Supp. 2d 564 (N.D.W. Va. 2003).
“Because the WVLP’s candidate for governor did not poll at least one percent of the total number of votes cast for all candidates for governor in the 2000 election, the party and its candidates must follow the procedures enumerated by West Virginia Code sections 3-5-23 and 3-5-24…”
W. Va. Code § 3-5-23(f): 2 cases
McClure v. Manchin, 301 F. Supp. 2d 564 (N.D.W. Va. 2003).
“Because the WVLP’s candidate for governor did not poll at least one percent of the total number of votes cast for all candidates for governor in the 2000 election, the party and its candidates must follow the procedures enumerated by West Virginia Code sections 3-5-23 and 3-5-24…”
SER Donald L. Blankenship v. Mac Warner, W. Va. Sec'y of State, 825 S.E.2d 309 (W. Va. 2018).
“Code § 3-5-23 (2006), before the 2009 amendment, provided that "any person violating the provisions of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be fined not more than one thousand dollars, or confined in jail for not more than one year, or both.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.