W. Va. Code » §33-24-27.
West Virginia Code

W. Va. Code § 33-24-27 (2026)

Repealed. Acts, 2004 Reg. Sess., Ch. 143

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WV-LEGwvlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
ARTICLE 24. HOSPITAL SERVICE CORPORATIONS, MEDICAL SERVICE CORPORATIONS, DENTAL SERVICE CORPORATIONS AND HEALTH SERVICE CORPORATIONS.

§33-24-27.

Repealed.

Acts, 2004 Reg. Sess., Ch. 143.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1995–2015 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Clark v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of West Virginia, Inc., 510 S.E.2d 764 (W. Va. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Ex Rel. Clark v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of West Virginia, Inc., 510 S.E.2d 764 (W. Va. 1998). · cites it 41× “, W. Va.Code § 33-24-27 reverse preempts the federal priority statute asserted by the United States.”
State ex rel. Ins. Comm'r of West Virginia v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of West Virginia, Inc., 638 S.E.2d 144 (W. Va. 2006). · cites it 14× “” Additionally, the circuit court concluded, as point *553 ed out in the Receiver’s brief, “that even if the trace were proven, the [UMWA] could not rely on a trace theory because tracing was an equitable remedy barred in liquidation proceedings by W. Va.Code, § 33-24-27.” We…”
Ito v. Investors Equity Life Holding Co.., 346 P.3d 118 (Haw. 2015). · cites it 2× “’ W. Va. Code § 33-24-27 . Id. at 392 (emphasis and alterations omitted).”
State Ex Rel. Clark v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of West Virginia, Inc., 466 S.E.2d 388 (W. Va. 1995). · cites it 8× “Code § 33-24-26 [ (1992) ], if any exists, is asserted; (iv) the classification for ‘priority of distribution,’ as defined in W.Va.Code § 33-24-27 [ (1992) ], requested and the facts which support such request; and (v) be verified by an unsworn declaration under penalty of…”
State Ex Rel. Ins. Com'r v. Bcbs, 638 S.E.2d 144 (W. Va. 2006). · cites it 14× “" Additionally, the circuit court concluded, as pointed *156 out in the Receiver's brief, "that even if the trace were proven, the [UMWA] could not rely on a trace theory because tracing was an equitable remedy barred in liquidation proceedings by W. Va.Code, § 33-24-27." We…”
W. Va. Code § 33-24-27(b): 1 case
State Ex Rel. Clark v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of West Virginia, Inc., 510 S.E.2d 764 (W. Va. 1998). “, W. Va.Code § 33-24-27 reverse preempts the federal priority statute asserted by the United States.”
W. Va. Code § 33-24-27(f): 1 case
State Ex Rel. Clark v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of West Virginia, Inc., 466 S.E.2d 388 (W. Va. 1995). “Code § 33-24-26 [ (1992) ], if any exists, is asserted; (iv) the classification for ‘priority of distribution,’ as defined in W.Va.Code § 33-24-27 [ (1992) ], requested and the facts which support such request; and (v) be verified by an unsworn declaration under penalty of…”
W. Va. Code § 33-24-27(g): 1 case
State Ex Rel. Clark v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of West Virginia, Inc., 510 S.E.2d 764 (W. Va. 1998). “, W. Va.Code § 33-24-27 reverse preempts the federal priority statute asserted by the United States.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.