West Virginia Code

W. Va. Code § 49-4-602 (2026)

Petition to court when child believed neglected or abused; temporary care, custody, and control of child at different stages of proceeding; temporary care; orders; emergency removal; when reasonable efforts to preserve family are unnecessary

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WV-LEGwvlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
ARTICLE 4. COURT ACTIONS.

§49-4-602. Petition to court when child believed neglected or abused; temporary care, custody, and control of child at different stages of proceeding; temporary care; orders; emergency removal; when reasonable efforts to preserve family are unnecessary.

(a)(1) Temporary care, custody, and control upon filing of the petition. -- Upon the filing of a petition, the court may order that the child alleged to be an abused or neglected child be delivered for not more than ten days into the care, custody, and control of the department or a responsible person who is not the custodial parent or guardian of the child, if it finds that:

(A) There exists imminent danger to the physical well-being of the child; and

(B) There are no reasonably available alternatives to removal of the child, including, but not limited to, the provision of medical, psychiatric, psychological or homemaking services in the child's present custody.

(2) Where the alleged abusing person, if known, is a member of a household, the court shall not allow placement pursuant to this section of the child or children in the home unless the alleged abusing person is or has been precluded from visiting or residing in the home by judicial order.

(3) In a case where there is more than one child in the home, or in the temporary care, custody or control of the alleged offending parent, the petition shall so state. Notwithstanding the fact that the allegations of abuse or neglect may pertain to less than all of those children, each child in the home for whom relief is sought shall be made a party to the proceeding. Even though the acts of abuse or neglect alleged in the petition were not directed against a specific child who is named in the petition, the court shall order the removal of the child, pending final disposition, if it finds that there exists imminent danger to the physical well-being of the child and a lack of reasonable available alternatives to removal.

(4) The initial order directing custody shall contain an order appointing counsel and scheduling the preliminary hearing, and upon its service shall require the immediate transfer of care, custody, and control of the child or children to the department or a responsible relative, which may include any parent, guardian, or other custodian. The court order shall state:

(A) That continuation in the home is contrary to the best interests of the child and why; and

(B) Whether or not the department made reasonable efforts to preserve the family and prevent the placement or that the emergency situation made those efforts unreasonable or impossible. The order may also direct any party or the department to initiate or become involved in services to facilitate reunification of the family.

(b) Temporary care, custody and control at preliminary hearing. -- Whether or not the court orders immediate transfer of custody as provided in subsection (a) of this section, if the facts alleged in the petition demonstrate to the court that there exists imminent danger to the child, the court may schedule a preliminary hearing giving the respondents at least five days' actual notice. If the court finds at the preliminary hearing that there are no alternatives less drastic than removal of the child and that a hearing on the petition cannot be scheduled in the interim period, the court may order that the child be delivered into the temporary care, custody, and control of the department or a responsible person or agency found by the court to be a fit and proper person for the temporary care of the child for a period not exceeding sixty days. The court order shall state:

(1) That continuation in the home is contrary to the best interests of the child and set forth the reasons therefor;

(2) Whether or not the department made reasonable efforts to preserve the family and to prevent the child's removal from his or her home;

(3) Whether or not the department made reasonable efforts to preserve the family and to prevent the placement or that the emergency situation made those efforts unreasonable or impossible;

(4) Whether or not the department made reasonable accommodations in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §12101, et seq., to parents with disabilities in order to allow them meaningful access to reunification and family preservation services; and

(5) What efforts should be made by the department, if any, to facilitate the child's return home. If the court grants an improvement period as provided in section six hundred ten of this article, the sixty-day limit upon temporary custody is waived.

(c) Emergency removal by department during pendency of case. -- Regardless of whether the court has previously granted the department care and custody of a child, if the department takes physical custody of a child during the pendency of a child abuse and neglect case (also known as removing the child) due to a change in circumstances and without a court order issued at the time of the removal, the department must immediately notify the court and a hearing shall take place within ten days to determine if there is imminent danger to the physical well-being of the child, and there is no reasonably available alternative to removal of the child. The court findings and order shall be consistent with subsections (a) and (b) of this section.

(d) Situations when reasonable efforts to preserve the family are not required. -- For purposes of the court's consideration of temporary custody pursuant to subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this section, the department is not required to make reasonable efforts to preserve the family if the court determines:

(1) The parent has subjected the child, another child of the parent or any other child residing in the same household or under the temporary or permanent custody of the parent to aggravated circumstances which include, but are not limited to, abandonment, torture, chronic abuse and sexual abuse;

(2) The parent has:

(A) Committed murder of the child's other parent, guardian or custodian, another child of the parent or any other child residing in the same household or under the temporary or permanent custody of the parent;

(B) Committed voluntary manslaughter of the child's other parent, guardian or custodian, another child of the parent or any other child residing in the same household or under the temporary or permanent custody of the parent;

(C) Attempted or conspired to commit murder or voluntary manslaughter or been an accessory before or after the fact to either crime;

(D) Committed unlawful or malicious wounding that results in serious bodily injury to the child, the child's other parent, guardian or custodian, to another child of the parent or any other child residing in the same household or under the temporary or permanent custody of the parent;

(E) Committed sexual assault or sexual abuse of the child, the child's other parent, guardian or custodian, another child of the parent or any other child residing in the same household or under the temporary or permanent custody of the parent; or

(F) Has been required by state or federal law to register with a sex offender registry, and the court has determined in consideration of the nature and circumstances surrounding the prior charges against that parent, that the child's interests would not be promoted by a preservation of the family; or

(3) The parental rights of the parent to another child have been terminated involuntarily.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 45 cases (25 in the last 5 years), 2017–2026 · leading case: In Re I.M.K., 815 S.E.2d 490 (W. Va. 2018).
In Re I.M.K., 815 S.E.2d 490 (W. Va. 2018). · cites it 2× “But see W. Va. Code § 49-4-602 (d) (2015) (Repl. Vol.”
In Re Guardianship of K.W., M.W., & A.W., 813 S.E.2d 154 (W. Va. 2018). “The temporary guardianship put in place by the family court was an attempt to protect these children from their parents in the face of imminent need, not unlike removal by DHHR prior to filing a petition under West Virginia Code § 49-4-303 and temporary custodial placement…”
In Re: R.Y., No. 16-1125 (W. Va. Nov. 2, 2017). · cites it 11× “See W.Va. Code §§ 49-4-602(a), (b), and (c). As such, we find that no reversible error is raised by this assignment of error.”
In re G.S., No. 20-0247 (W. Va. Apr. 2, 2021). · cites it 8× “” W. Va. Code § 49-4-602 (a)(4) (emphasis added).”
In Re R.r., M.r., B.h., T.h., & E.H., No. 21-0867 (W. Va. May 12, 2022). · cites it 6× “Further, pursuant to W. Va. Code § 49-4-602 (a)(3), [i]n a case where there is more than one child in the home, or in the temporary care, custody or control of the alleged offending parent, the petition shall so state.”
In Re R.r., M.r., B.h., T.h., & E.H., No. 21-0865 (W. Va. May 12, 2022). · cites it 6× “Further, pursuant to W. Va. Code § 49-4-602 (a)(3), [i]n a case where there is more than one child in the home, or in the temporary care, custody or control of the alleged offending parent, the petition shall so state.”
In re K.S, No. 24-740 (W. Va. May 15, 2026). · cites it 6× “See W. Va. Code § 49-4-602 (a)(4)(B), § 49-4-604.”
In re J.F.-1, C.F., & L.H., No. 24-306 (W. Va. Nov. 12, 2025). · cites it 4× “The court found that there was probable cause to support the allegations in the petition and that, consistent with West Virginia Code section 49-4-602(a)(1) (2024),4 there existed imminent danger to the children necessitating their removal from the home of the petitioner and the…”
In re M.B. (Just. Ewing, concurring), No. 24-176 (W. Va. Nov. 14, 2025). · cites it 4× “”); W. Va. Code § 49-4-602 (a) (2015) (relating to temporary placement with the Department of Human Services (“DHS”) upon the filing of a petition) and (b) (relating to temporary placement with the DHS, “or a responsible person or agency found by the court to be a fit and proper…”
State of West Virginia ex rel. West Virginia Dep't of Human Servs. v. The Honorable Steven Redding, Judge of the Circuit Court of Berkeley Cnty., No. 24-658 and 24-659 (W. Va. Apr. 29, 2026). · cites it 4× “Code § 49-4-605 to file a petition seeking to terminate parental rights[]” and, importantly: If it is determined that the circumstances bring the filing decision within the Department’s discretionary authority, no such writ shall issue unless the court specifically finds…”
In re S.B. & J.B., No. 19-0583 (W. Va. Feb. 7, 2020). · cites it 3× “Contrary to petitioner’s argument, however, the West Virginia Code section detailing the requirements for filing an abuse and neglect petition, West 4 Petitioner’s citation to “West Virginia Code § 49-4-602(A)” is inadequate as it fails to refer to a specific subsection within…”
In re M.O., No. 20-0698 (W. Va. June 14, 2021). · cites it 3× “from Father in violation of West Virginia Code section 49-4-602(c) (eff. 2015). This section provides as follows: (c) Emergency removal by department during pendency of case.”
W. Va. Code § 49-4-602(A): 1 case
In re S.B. & J.B., No. 19-0583 (W. Va. Feb. 7, 2020). “Contrary to petitioner’s argument, however, the West Virginia Code section detailing the requirements for filing an abuse and neglect petition, West 4 Petitioner’s citation to “West Virginia Code § 49-4-602(A)” is inadequate as it fails to refer to a specific subsection within…”
W. Va. Code § 49-4-602(a): 2 cases
In Re: R.Y., No. 16-1125 (W. Va. Nov. 2, 2017). “See W.Va. Code §§ 49-4-602(a), (b), and (c). As such, we find that no reversible error is raised by this assignment of error.”
State of West Virginia ex rel. West Virginia Dep't of Human Servs. v. The Honorable Steven Redding, Judge of the Circuit Court of Berkeley Cnty., No. 24-658 and 24-659 (W. Va. Apr. 29, 2026). “Code § 49-4-605 to file a petition seeking to terminate parental rights[]” and, importantly: If it is determined that the circumstances bring the filing decision within the Department’s discretionary authority, no such writ shall issue unless the court specifically finds…”
W. Va. Code § 49-4-602(a)(1): 8 cases
In re J.F.-1, C.F., & L.H., No. 24-306 (W. Va. Nov. 12, 2025). “The court found that there was probable cause to support the allegations in the petition and that, consistent with West Virginia Code section 49-4-602(a)(1) (2024),4 there existed imminent danger to the children necessitating their removal from the home of the petitioner and the…”
In Re: R.Y., No. 16-1125 (W. Va. Nov. 2, 2017). “See W.Va. Code §§ 49-4-602(a), (b), and (c). As such, we find that no reversible error is raised by this assignment of error.”
In re E.H., No. 19-0761 (W. Va. Apr. 28, 2020).
In re: B.H., No. 20-0436 (W. Va. Dec. 10, 2020).
W. Va. Code § 49-4-602(a)(4): 1 case
In re K.S, No. 24-740 (W. Va. May 15, 2026). “See W. Va. Code § 49-4-602 (a)(4)(B), § 49-4-604.”
W. Va. Code § 49-4-602(a)(4)(B): 2 cases
In Re R.r., M.r., B.h., T.h., & E.H., No. 21-0867 (W. Va. May 12, 2022). “Further, pursuant to W. Va. Code § 49-4-602 (a)(3), [i]n a case where there is more than one child in the home, or in the temporary care, custody or control of the alleged offending parent, the petition shall so state.”
In Re R.r., M.r., B.h., T.h., & E.H., No. 21-0865 (W. Va. May 12, 2022). “Further, pursuant to W. Va. Code § 49-4-602 (a)(3), [i]n a case where there is more than one child in the home, or in the temporary care, custody or control of the alleged offending parent, the petition shall so state.”
W. Va. Code § 49-4-602(b): 2 cases
In Re: R.Y., No. 16-1125 (W. Va. Nov. 2, 2017). “See W.Va. Code §§ 49-4-602(a), (b), and (c). As such, we find that no reversible error is raised by this assignment of error.”
In re L.D. & J.D., No. 18-1064 & 19-0070 (W. Va. June 12, 2019).
W. Va. Code § 49-4-602(b)(2): 1 case
State of West Virginia ex rel. West Virginia Dep't of Human Servs. v. The Honorable Steven Redding, Judge of the Circuit Court of Berkeley Cnty., No. 24-658 and 24-659 (W. Va. Apr. 29, 2026). “Code § 49-4-605 to file a petition seeking to terminate parental rights[]” and, importantly: If it is determined that the circumstances bring the filing decision within the Department’s discretionary authority, no such writ shall issue unless the court specifically finds…”
W. Va. Code § 49-4-602(c): 5 cases
In Re: R.Y., No. 16-1125 (W. Va. Nov. 2, 2017). “See W.Va. Code §§ 49-4-602(a), (b), and (c). As such, we find that no reversible error is raised by this assignment of error.”
In re M.R. Jr., No. 19-1131 (W. Va. June 25, 2020).
In re M.O., No. 20-0698 (W. Va. June 14, 2021). “from Father in violation of West Virginia Code section 49-4-602(c) (eff. 2015). This section provides as follows: (c) Emergency removal by department during pendency of case.”
In re B.C., E.C. & G.C., No. 18-033 (W. Va. Mar. 15, 2019).
In re M.L., No. 19-0219 (W. Va. May 8, 2020).
W. Va. Code § 49-4-602(d): 7 cases
In Re: R.Y., No. 16-1125 (W. Va. Nov. 2, 2017). “See W.Va. Code §§ 49-4-602(a), (b), and (c). As such, we find that no reversible error is raised by this assignment of error.”
In re: C.C. & M.C., No. 19-0322 (W. Va. Nov. 19, 2019).
In Re P.m., M.m., L.g., & D.G., No. 19-1058 (W. Va. June 25, 2020).
In re: S.H.,C.H. & D.H., No. 20-0378 (W. Va. Dec. 10, 2020).
W. Va. Code § 49-4-602(d)(1): 1 case
In re S.F., E.F. & A.F., No. 20-0817 (W. Va. Apr. 20, 2021).
W. Va. Code § 49-4-602(d)(2)(E): 4 cases
In re: T.R. & I.A., No. 20-0596 (W. Va. Dec. 10, 2020).
In re: I.A., No. 20-0587 (W. Va. Dec. 10, 2020).
In re I.H., O.H. & R.H., No. 20-0738 (W. Va. Apr. 20, 2021).
In re I.H., O.H. & R.H., No. 20-0701 (W. Va. Apr. 20, 2021).
W. Va. Code § 49-4-602(d)(3): 1 case
In Re: R.Y., No. 16-1125 (W. Va. Nov. 2, 2017). “See W.Va. Code §§ 49-4-602(a), (b), and (c). As such, we find that no reversible error is raised by this assignment of error.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.