West Virginia Code

W. Va. Code § 5-16-3 (2026)

Composition of Public Employees Insurance Agency

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WV-LEGwvlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
ARTICLE 16. WEST VIRGINIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES INSURANCE ACT.

§5-16-3. Composition of Public Employees Insurance Agency.

(a) The Public Employees Insurance Agency consists of the director, the finance board, the advisory board, and any employees who may be authorized by law. The director shall be appointed by the Governor, with the advice and consent of the Senate, and serve at the will and pleasure of the Governor. The director shall have at least three years’ experience in health or governmental health benefit administration as his or her primary employment duty prior to appointment as director. The director shall receive actual expenses incurred in the performance of official business. The director shall employ any administrative, technical, and clerical employees required for the proper administration of the programs provided in this article. The director shall perform the duties that are required of him or her under the provisions of this article and is the Chief Administrative Officer of the Public Employees Insurance Agency. The director may employ a deputy director.

(b) Except for the director, his or her personal secretary, the deputy director, and the chief financial officer, all positions in the agency shall be included in the classified service of the civil service system pursuant to §29-6-1 et seq. of this code.

(c) The director is responsible for the administration and management of the Public Employees Insurance Agency as provided in this article and in connection with his or her responsibility may make all rules necessary to effectuate the provisions of this article. Nothing in §5-16-4 or §5-16-5 of this code limits the director’s ability to manage on a day-to-day basis the group insurance plans required or authorized by this article, including, but not limited to, administrative contracting, studies, analyses and audits, eligibility determinations, utilization management provisions and incentives, provider negotiations, provider contracting and payment, designation of covered and noncovered services, offering of additional coverage options or cost containment incentives, pursuit of coordination of benefits, and subrogation, or any other actions which would serve to implement the plan or plans designed by the finance board. The director is to function as a benefits management professional and should avoid political involvement in managing the affairs of the Public Employees Insurance Agency.

(d) The director may, if it is financially advantageous to the state, operate the Medicare retiree health benefit plan offered by the agency based on a plan year that runs concurrent with the calendar year. Financial plans as addressed in section five of this article shall continue to be on a fiscal-year basis.

(e) The director should make every effort to evaluate and administer programs to improve quality, improve health status of members, develop innovative payment methodologies, manage health care delivery costs, evaluate effective benefit designs, evaluate cost sharing and benefit-based programs, and adopt effective industry programs that can manage the long-term effectiveness and costs for the programs at the Public Employees Insurance Agency to include, but not be limited to:

(1) Increasing generic fill rates;

(2) Managing specialty pharmacy costs;

(3) Implementing and evaluating medical home models and health care delivery;

(4) Coordinating with providers, private insurance carriers, and, to the extent possible, Medicare to encourage the establishment of cost-effective accountable care organizations;

(5) Exploring and developing advanced payment methodologies for care delivery such as case rates, capitation, and other potential risk-sharing models and partial risk-sharing models for accountable care organizations and medical homes;

(6) Adopting measures identified by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to reduce cost and enhance quality;

(7) Evaluating the expenditures to reduce excessive use of emergency room visits, imaging services, and other drivers of the agency’s medical rate of inflation;

(8) Recommending cutting-edge benefit designs to the finance board to drive behavior and control costs for the plans;

(9) Implementing programs to encourage the use of the most efficient and high-quality providers by employees and retired employees;

(10) Identifying employees and retired employees who have multiple chronic illnesses and initiating programs to coordinate the care of these patients;

(11) Initiating steps to adjust payment by the agency for the treatment of hospital-acquired infections and related events consistent with the payment policies, operational guidelines, and implementation timetable established by the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services. The agency shall protect employees and retired employees from any adjustment in payment for hospital acquired infections; and

(12) Initiating steps to reduce the number of employees and retired employees who experience avoidable readmissions to a hospital for the same diagnosis-related group illness within 30 days of being discharged by a hospital in this state or another state consistent with the payment policies, operational guidelines, and implementation timetable established by the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1983–2024 · leading case: Nelson v. West Virginia Pub. Employees Ins. Bd., 300 S.E.2d 86 (W. Va. 1983).
Nelson v. West Virginia Pub. Employees Ins. Bd., 300 S.E.2d 86 (W. Va. 1983). · cites it 8× “The respondents are the West Virginia Public Employees Insurance Board, a body created and established in 1971 under the provisions of W.Va.Code § 5-16-3 (1979 Replacement Vol.”
Fain v. Crouch (S.D.W. Va 2021). · cites it 3× “Given that Cheatham is tasked with “designation of covered and noncovered services” and “offering [] additional coverage options,” W. Va. Code § 5-16-3 (c), he is statutorily authorized to grant Plaintiffs access to gender-confirming care.”
Brian Cunningham, in his capacity as Dir. of the Pub. Employees Ins. Agency, & Mark D. Scott, Geoff S. Christian, Amanda D. Meadows, Jared Robertson, Damita Johnson, Jason Myers, Michael Cook, William Milam, & Michael T. Smith, in their capacities as Members of the Pub. Employees Ins. Agency Fin. Bd. v. Air Evac EMS, Inc. (2024). “9 The circuit court also rejected PEIA’s contention that, pursuant to its authority under West Virginia Code § 5-16-3(c) (2013), it had retroactively lifted the ban on balance- billing for the transports in question, which would permit Air Evac to recover any unpaid balance from…”
Martine v. Hertz Corp (4th Cir. 1996). “See W. Va. Code § 5-16-3 (c) (1990). The legislative rules specifying an insured's rights under the Public Employees Insurance Act provide: "In the event that benefits are paid to any insured for bodily injury caused by a third party, the Public Employees Insurance Board shall…”
W. Va. Code § 5-16-3(c): 2 cases
Brian Cunningham, in his capacity as Dir. of the Pub. Employees Ins. Agency, & Mark D. Scott, Geoff S. Christian, Amanda D. Meadows, Jared Robertson, Damita Johnson, Jason Myers, Michael Cook, William Milam, & Michael T. Smith, in their capacities as Members of the Pub. Employees Ins. Agency Fin. Bd. v. Air Evac EMS, Inc. (2024). “9 The circuit court also rejected PEIA’s contention that, pursuant to its authority under West Virginia Code § 5-16-3(c) (2013), it had retroactively lifted the ban on balance- billing for the transports in question, which would permit Air Evac to recover any unpaid balance from…”
Fain v. Crouch (S.D.W. Va 2021). “Given that Cheatham is tasked with “designation of covered and noncovered services” and “offering [] additional coverage options,” W. Va. Code § 5-16-3 (c), he is statutorily authorized to grant Plaintiffs access to gender-confirming care.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.