Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 1.03 (2026)

Concurrent jurisdiction over United States sites; conveyances

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1.031.03 Concurrent jurisdiction over United States sites; conveyances. The conditions mentioned in s. 1.02 are the following conditions precedent:

1.03(1)(1) That an application setting forth an exact description of the place or tract so acquired shall be made by an authorized officer of the United States to the governor, accompanied by a plat thereof, and by proof that all conveyances and a copy of the record of all judicial proceedings necessary to the acquisition of an unencumbered title by the United States have been recorded in the office of the register of deeds of each county in which such place or tract may be situated in whole or in part.

1.03(2)(2) That the ceded jurisdiction shall not vest in the United States until they shall have complied with all the requirements on their part of ss. 1.02 and 1.03, and shall continue so long only as the place or tract shall remain the property of the United States.

1.03(3)(3) That the state shall forever retain concurrent jurisdiction over every such place or tract to the extent that all legal and military process issued under the authority of the state may be served anywhere thereon, or in any building situated in whole or in part thereon.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 19 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1901–2022 · leading case: Russell Adams v. Northland Equip. Co., Inc., 2014 WI 79 (Wis. 2014).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Russell Adams v. Northland Equip. Co., Inc., 2014 WI 79 (Wis. 2014). · cites it 2× “Larson, Larson's Workers' Compensation Law § 1.03[2], at 1-5 (2012). ¶25 By enacting worker's compensation, "the legislature intended to impose upon employers an absolute liability, regardless of fault; and in return for this burden, intended to grant employers immunity from all…”

Wirth v. Ehly, 287 N.W.2d 140 (Wis. 1980). “” Sands, 1 Sutherland Statutory Construction, §1.03 (4th Ed. 1972). The plaintiffs finally challenge sec.”

Attorney's Title Guar. Fund, Inc. v. Town Bank, 2014 WI 63 (Wis. 2014). · cites it 2× “McDonnell, Secured Transactions Under the Uniform Commercial Code: Article 9 and the Security Controversy, § 1.03, at 1-14 (2009). As the facts of this case aptly demonstrate, secured creditors may be able to access a debtor's property in ways that an unsecured judgment creditor…”

Town of Brockway v. City of Black River Falls, 2005 WI App 174 (Wis. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “In section 1.03 of the agreement, the City acknowledges that McFour Ventures has requested Rural Development District Zoning and that this is necessary to create a TIF district.”

Johnson v. Bowen, 687 F. Supp. 1284 (W.D. Wis. 1988). · cites it 3× “1, § 1.03. The regulation governing obesity impairments is 20 CFR § 404 .”

Rasmussen v. Gen. Motors Corp., 2011 WI 52 (Wis. 2011). “For discussions of the enterprise theory examining the corporate group as a unit, see Blumberg, supra note 4, § 1.03, at 23-25; Schwartz, supra note 1, at 735; Brilmayer & Paisley, supra note 14, at 30.”

Martinson v. Kellogg-Citizens Nat'l Bank, 182 N.W.2d 238 (Wis. 1971). · cites it 3× “The specific portions of the will relevant to the issue are: Sections 1.03, 1.04, and 1.07. 1 *395 The guardian ad litem for the children contends the marital trust should not be relieved of the burden of paying the Wisconsin inheritance taxes assessed against it.”

Metso Minerals Indus., Inc. v. FLSmidth-Excel LLC, 733 F. Supp. 2d 969 (E.D. Wis. 2010). “Jager, Trade Secret Law § 1.03, at 1-4 to 1-8 (“The encouragement of increasingly higher standards of fairness and commercial morality continues to be the touchstone of trade secret law in the courts.”

Carlson v. City of Delafield, 779 F. Supp. 2d 928 (E.D. Wis. 2011). · cites it 2× “As the facts indicate, Carlson was appointed as City Administrator by the mayor and his appointment was approved by the Common Council, as required, by § 1.03 of the City Ordinances. 7 See http:/Aibrary6.”

Wyss v. Albee, 515 N.W.2d 517 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “RIBSTEIN, BROMBERG AND RIBSTEIN ON PARTNERSHIP § 1.03, at 1:22 (1994). They suggest, however, that "[a]n examination of the U.”

State v. Shepard, 300 N.W. 905 (Wis. 1941). · cites it 2× “, originally enacted in 1867, declares that— “Subject to the conditions mentioned in section 1.03 the legislature hereby consents to the acquisitions heretofore effected and hereafter to be effected by the United States, by gift, purchase or condemnation proceedings, of the…”

Gorokhovsky v. State Pub. Def. Off. (E.D. Wis. 2021). · cites it 11× “The complaint mentions sections 1.03 and 1.035 of the same administrative code.”

Show all 19 citing cases →

— Wis. Stat. § 1.03(1) — 1 case

Carlson v. City of Delafield, 779 F. Supp. 2d 928 (E.D. Wis. 2011). “As the facts indicate, Carlson was appointed as City Administrator by the mayor and his appointment was approved by the Common Council, as required, by § 1.03 of the City Ordinances. 7 See http:/Aibrary6.”

— Wis. Stat. § 1.03(3) — 1 case

Williams v. United States, 145 F. Supp. 4 (W.D. Wis. 1956).

— Wis. Stat. § 1.03(4) — 1 case