Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 1.05 (2026)

United States sites for aids to navigation

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
1.051.05United States sites for aids to navigation. Whenever the United States shall desire to acquire title to any land belonging to the state and covered by the navigable waters of the United States, for sites for lighthouses, beacons, or other aids to navigation, the governor may, upon application therefor by any authorized officer of the United States, setting forth an exact description of the place desired, and accompanied by a plat thereof, grant and convey to the United States, by a deed executed by the governor in the name of the state and under the great seal, all the title of the state thereto; and such conveyance shall be evidence of the consent of the legislature to such purchase upon the conditions specified in s. 1.03.
1.05 HistoryHistory: 1989 a. 56.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1979–2025 · leading case: Carlson v. City of Delafield, 779 F. Supp. 2d 928 (E.D. Wis. 2011).
Carlson v. City of Delafield, 779 F. Supp. 2d 928 (E.D. Wis. 2011). · cites it 2× “Section 1.05 of the Delafield Ordinances provides that “[appointed officials may be removed as provided in §§ 17.”
J.P. Morgan Trust Co. v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 446 F. Supp. 2d 956 (E.D. Wis. 2006). “McCullough, Letters of Credit, (MB) § 1.05 (2005) (citing Bancode Vizcaya, S.”
Milwaukee Dist. Council 48 v. Milwaukee Cnty., 2011 WI App 14 (Wis. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 13× “" In attempting to discern from the collective-bargaining contract the outer boundaries of "temporary," the Arbitrator looked to sections 1.05 and 2.11(1) in the collective-bargaining contract.”
United States v. Sinagub, 468 F. Supp. 353 (W.D. Wis. 1979). · cites it 2× “See Benchbook for United States District Judges, Federal Judicial Center, Section 1.05 (1969). It has been the practice in this court, followed in the present case, to inquire near the outset of the hearing what the defendant’s plea is.”
McBride v. Comm'r of the Soc. Sec. Admin. (E.D. Wis. 2020). “1, § 1.05; see, e.g., Soles v. Colvin, No. 1:13CV491, 2015 U.”
Vill. of Hobart, Wisconsin v. United States Dep't of the Interior, et al. (E.D. Wis. 2025). “2d at 912–13; see also COHEN’S HANDBOOK OF FEDERAL INDIAN LAW § 1.05 (Nell Jessup Newton ed., 2012). With the advent of Indian gaming, however, this changed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.