Notes of Decisions
German v. Wisconsin Dep't of Transp., 2000 WI 62 (Wis. 2000).
· cites it 22× “Their suit to compel payment of wages due was filed pursuant to Wis. Stat. §§ 109.01 and 109.03, the Wage Payments, Claims and Collections Law (wage claim law).”
Hubbard v. Messer, 2003 WI 145 (Wis. 2003).
· cites it 6× “Under Wis. Stat. § 109.01 (4), a "wage deficiency" is defined as "the difference between the amount required by law to be paid and the amount actually paid to an employee.”
German v. Wisconsin Dep't of Transp., 589 N.W.2d 651 (Wis. Ct. App. 1998).
· cites it 14× “" The definition of employer in § 109.01(2), Stats., 4 includes "the state and its political subdivisions.”
Sliwinski v. City of Milwaukee, 2009 WI App 162 (Wis. Ct. App. 2009).
· cites it 28× “109 did not apply to payments owed to Sliwinski for his discharge period, finding that the "personal services" language in Wis. Stat. § 109.01 (3) requires that the employee perform actual work during the time period for which he is making a wage claim.”
Jacobson v. Am. Tool Cos., Inc., 588 N.W.2d 67 (Wis. Ct. App. 1998).
· cites it 4× “Finally, the court concluded that the stock appreciation rights fell within the definition of "wages" in § 109.01(3), Stats., 1 but refused to hold that American's failure to redeem those rights constituted a violation of ch.”
Pfister v. Milwaukee Econ. Dev. Corp., 576 N.W.2d 554 (Wis. Ct. App. 1998).
· cites it 7× “Commission Payments [9] First Bank, but not MEDC, additionally argues that even if the amended statutes are to be retroactively *265 applied to Pfister's lien, we still must affirm the trial court's denial of Pfister's claim because "performance-based commission payments" are…”
Champine v. Milwaukee Cnty., 2005 WI App 75 (Wis. Ct. App. 2005).
· cites it 4× “Wis. Stat. § 109.01 (3). ¶ 28. Because there do not appear to be any reported cases in Wisconsin dealing with application of this statute to relatively similar facts, the Class cites State Bar of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Employment Law § 11.”
Cent. Nat'l Bank of Wausau v. Dustin, 321 N.W.2d 321 (Wis. Ct. App. 1982).
· cites it 4× “Section 109.01(3), Stats., provides in part: “‘wage’ or ‘wages’ mean remuneration payable to an employe for personal services, including .”
Massachusetts v. Morash, 490 U.S. 107 (1989).
“5155 to 5159 (Vernon 1987); Utah Code Ann. §§34-28-2 to 34-28-14 (1988); Vt.”
Erdman v. Jovoco, Inc., 496 N.W.2d 183 (Wis. Ct. App. 1992).
· cites it 8× “01(3) contained a definition of "wages" that included commissions. Had the legislature intended a narrower definition of the term "wages" for purposes of applying sec.”
State, Dep't of Indus., Labor & Human Relations v. Coatings, Inc., 376 N.W.2d 834 (Wis. 1985).
· cites it 4× “Section 109.01 (3) defines “wages” as follows: “ ‘Wage’ or ‘wages’ mean remuneration payable to an employe for personal services, including salaries, commissions, holiday and vacation pay, overtime pay, severance pay or dismissal pay, supplemental unemployment compensation…”
— Wis. Stat. § 109.01(1r) — 2 cases
— Wis. Stat. § 109.01(2) — 3 cases
German v. Wisconsin Dep't of Transp., 589 N.W.2d 651 (Wis. Ct. App. 1998).
“" The definition of employer in § 109.01(2), Stats., 4 includes "the state and its political subdivisions.”
German v. Wisconsin Dep't of Transp., 2000 WI 62 (Wis. 2000).
“Their suit to compel payment of wages due was filed pursuant to Wis. Stat. §§ 109.01 and 109.03, the Wage Payments, Claims and Collections Law (wage claim law).”
— Wis. Stat. § 109.01(3) — 20 cases
Jacobson v. Am. Tool Cos., Inc., 588 N.W.2d 67 (Wis. Ct. App. 1998).
“Finally, the court concluded that the stock appreciation rights fell within the definition of "wages" in § 109.01(3), Stats., 1 but refused to hold that American's failure to redeem those rights constituted a violation of ch.”
Pfister v. Milwaukee Econ. Dev. Corp., 576 N.W.2d 554 (Wis. Ct. App. 1998).
“Commission Payments [9] First Bank, but not MEDC, additionally argues that even if the amended statutes are to be retroactively *265 applied to Pfister's lien, we still must affirm the trial court's denial of Pfister's claim because "performance-based commission payments" are…”
Cent. Nat'l Bank of Wausau v. Dustin, 321 N.W.2d 321 (Wis. Ct. App. 1982).
“Section 109.01(3), Stats., provides in part: “‘wage’ or ‘wages’ mean remuneration payable to an employe for personal services, including .”
Sliwinski v. City of Milwaukee, 2009 WI App 162 (Wis. Ct. App. 2009).
“109 did not apply to payments owed to Sliwinski for his discharge period, finding that the "personal services" language in Wis. Stat. § 109.01 (3) requires that the employee perform actual work during the time period for which he is making a wage claim.”
German v. Wisconsin Dep't of Transp., 2000 WI 62 (Wis. 2000).
“Their suit to compel payment of wages due was filed pursuant to Wis. Stat. §§ 109.01 and 109.03, the Wage Payments, Claims and Collections Law (wage claim law).”
— Wis. Stat. § 109.01(4) — 2 cases
Hubbard v. Messer, 2003 WI 145 (Wis. 2003).
“Under Wis. Stat. § 109.01 (4), a "wage deficiency" is defined as "the difference between the amount required by law to be paid and the amount actually paid to an employee.”
— Wis. Stat. § 109.01(lr) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.