Wis. Stat. » CHAPTER 109 — WAGE PAYMENTS, CLAIMS AND COLLECTIONS
Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 109.07 (2026)

Mergers, liquidations, dispositions, relocations or cessation of operations affecting employees; advance notice required

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
109.07109.07 Mergers, liquidations, dispositions, relocations or cessation of operations affecting employees; advance notice required.
Down
Loading...
Loading...
× Details for
PDF view
Link (Permanent link)
Bookmark this location
 View toggle
 Go to top of document
Search in this chapter
 Search in this section
 Search in this agency
 Search in this chapter group
 Search in this chapter
 Search in this section
 Cross references for section
 Acts affecting this section
 References to this
 1970 Statutes Annotations
 Appellate Court Citations
 Administrative Code Index
Reference lines
 Clear highlighting
109.07(1)(1) In this section:
109.07(1)(a)(a) “Affected employee” means an employee who loses, or who may reasonably be expected to lose, his or her employment with an employer that is required to give notice under sub. (1m) (a) because of the business closing or mass layoff.
109.07(1)(b)(b) “Business closing” means a permanent or temporary shutdown of an employment site or of one or more facilities or operating units at an employment site or within a single municipality that affects 25 or more employees, not including new or low-hour employees.
109.07(1)(c)(c) “Employee benefit plan” means a plan as defined in 29 USC 1002 (3).
109.07(1)(d)(d) “Employer” means any business enterprise that employs 50 or more persons in this state.
109.07(1)(e)(e) “Highest official” means the mayor of a city, town board chairperson or village president, except as follows:
109.07(1)(e)1.1. For a city organized under subch. I of ch. 64, “highest official” means both the president of the city council and the city manager.
109.07(1)(e)2.2. For a village organized under subch. I of ch. 64, “highest official” means both the president of the village board of trustees and the village manager.
109.07(1)(f)(f) “Mass layoff” means a reduction in an employer’s work force that is not the result of a business closing and that affects the following numbers of employees at an employment site or within a single municipality, not including new or low-hour employees:
109.07(1)(f)1.1. At least 25 percent of the employer’s work force or 25 employees, whichever is greater; or
109.07(1)(f)2.2. At least 500 employees.
109.07(1)(g)(g) “Municipality” means a city, village or town.
109.07(1)(h)(h) “New or low-hour employee” means an employee who has been employed by an employer for fewer than 6 of the 12 months preceding the date on which a notice is required under sub. (1m) (a) or who averages fewer than 20 hours of work per week.
109.07(1m)(1m) 
109.07(1m)(a)(a) Subject to sub. (5) or (6), an employer that has decided upon a business closing or mass layoff in this state shall promptly notify the subunit of the department that administers s. 106.15, any affected employee, any collective bargaining representative of any affected employee, and the highest official of any municipality in which the affected employment site is located, in writing of such action no later than 60 days prior to the date on which the business closing or mass layoff takes place. The notice to an affected employee shall also include contact information for the local workforce development board under 29 USC 3122 serving the area in which the employment site is located and, if available, the list of resources prepared under s. 106.11. The employer shall provide in writing all information concerning its payroll, affected employees, and the wages and other remuneration owed to those employees as the department may require. The department may in addition require the employer to submit a plan setting forth the manner in which final payment in full shall be made to affected employees.
109.07(1m)(b)(b) The department shall promptly provide a copy of the notice required under par. (a) to the office of the commissioner of insurance and shall cooperate with the office of the commissioner of insurance in the performance of its responsibilities under s. 601.41 (7).
109.07(1m)(c)(c) This subsection does not apply to a business closing or mass layoff that is caused by a strike or lockout.
109.07(3)(3) 
109.07(3)(a)(a) If an employer fails to give timely notice to an affected employee as required under sub. (1m) (a), the affected employee may recover, as provided under sub. (4), all of the following:
109.07(3)(a)1.1. Pay, for the days during the recovery period described under par. (c) that the employee would have worked if the business closing or mass layoff had not occurred, based on the greater of the following:
109.07(3)(a)1.a.a. The employee’s regular rate of pay from the employer, averaged over the shorter of the 3-year period preceding the business closing or mass layoff or the entire period during which the employee was employed by the employer.
109.07(3)(a)1.b.b. The employee’s regular rate of pay from the employer at the time of the business closing or mass layoff.
109.07(3)(a)2.2. The value of any benefit that the employee would have received under an employee benefit plan during the recovery period described under par. (c), but did not receive because of the business closing or mass layoff, including the cost of medical treatment incurred that would have been covered under the employee benefit plan.
109.07(3)(b)(b) The amount that an employee may recover under par. (a) shall be reduced by any cost that the employer incurs by crediting the employee, under an employee benefit plan, for time not actually served because of a business closing or mass layoff.
109.07(3)(c)(c) The recovery period under par. (a) begins on the day on which the business closing or mass layoff occurs. The recovery period equals the number of days in the period beginning on the day on which an employer is required to give notice under sub. (1m) (a) and ending on whichever of the following occurs first:
109.07(3)(c)1.1. The day on which the employer actually gave the notice to the employee.
109.07(3)(c)2.2. The day on which the business closing or mass layoff occurred.
109.07(4)(4) 
109.07(4)(a)(a) An employee whose employer fails to notify timely the employee under sub. (1m) (a) may file a claim with the department. If the employee files a claim with the department no later than 300 days after the day on which the business closing or mass layoff occurred, the department shall, in the manner provided in s. 109.09, investigate the claim, determine the number of days that the employer was late in providing notice and, on behalf of the employee, attempt to recover from the employer the payment under sub. (3).
Down
Up
109.07(4)(b)(b) If the department does not recover payment within 180 days after a claim is filed or within 30 days after it notifies the employee of its determination under par. (a), whichever is first, the department shall refer the claim to the department of justice. The department of justice may bring an action in circuit court on behalf of the employee to recover the payment under sub. (3).
109.07(4)(c)(c) If the department of justice does not bring an action under par. (b) within 120 days after the claim is referred to it, the employee may bring an action in circuit court to recover the payment under sub. (3). If the employee prevails in the action, he or she shall also recover costs under ch. 814 and, notwithstanding s. 814.04 (1), reasonable attorney fees.
109.07(4)(d)(d) An action under this section shall be begun within one year after the department refers the claim to the department of justice under par. (b), or be barred.
109.07(4m)(4m) 
109.07(4m)(a)(a) If an employer fails to give timely notice to the highest official of a municipality as required under sub. (1m) (a), the department shall assess a business closing surcharge against the employer of not more than $500 for each day in the period beginning on the day on which the employer was required to give notice to the highest official and ending on the earlier of the day on which the employer actually gave notice to the highest official or the day on which the business closing or mass layoff occurred.
109.07(4m)(b)(b) The department shall deposit business closing surcharges collected under par. (a) in the general fund.
109.07(5)(5) 
109.07(5)(a)(a) An employer is not liable under this section for a failure to give notice to any person under sub. (1m) (a), if the department determines all of the following:
109.07(5)(a)1.1. When the notice under sub. (1m) (a) would have been timely given, that the employer was actively seeking capital or business to enable the employer to avoid or postpone indefinitely the business closing or mass layoff.
109.07(5)(a)2.2. That the employer reasonably and in good faith believed that giving the notices to all parties required under sub. (1m) (a) would have prevented the employer from obtaining the capital or business.
109.07(5)(b)(b) The department may not determine that an employer was actively seeking capital or business under par. (a) 1. unless the employer has a written record, made while the employer was seeking capital or business, of those activities. The record shall consist of the documents and other material specified by the department by rule under s. 109.12 (1) (b). The employer shall have individual documents in the record notarized, as required by the department’s rules. The employer shall provide the department with an affidavit verifying the content of the notarized documents.
109.07(6)(6) An employer is not liable under this section for a failure to give notice to any person under sub. (1m) (a), if the department determines that the business closing or mass layoff is the result of any of the following:
109.07(6)(a)(a) The sale of part or all of the employer’s business, if the purchaser agrees in writing, as part of the purchase agreement, to hire substantially all of the affected employees with not more than a 6-month break in employment.
109.07(6)(b)(b) The relocation of part or all of an employer’s business within a reasonable commuting distance, if the employer offers to transfer substantially all of the affected employees with not more than a 6-month break in employment.
109.07(6)(c)(c) The completion of a particular project or work of a specific duration, including seasonal work, if the affected employees were hired with the understanding that their employment was limited to the duration of such work or project.
109.07(6)(d)(d) Business circumstances that were not foreseeable when the notice would have been timely given.
109.07(6)(e)(e) A natural or man-made disaster beyond the control of the employer.
109.07(6)(f)(f) A temporary cessation in business operations, if the employer recalls the affected employees on or before the 60th day beginning after the cessation.
109.07(7)(7) Each employer shall post, in one or more conspicuous places where notices to employees are customarily posted, a notice in a form approved by the department setting forth employees’ rights under this section. Any employer who violates this subsection shall forfeit not more than $100.
109.07(8)(8) Section 111.322 (2m) applies to discharge and other discriminatory acts arising in connection with any proceeding under this section.
109.07 HistoryHistory: 1975 c. 380; 1983 a. 84, 149; 1983 a. 192 s. 304; 1983 a. 538; 1987 a. 27; 1989 a. 44, 228; 1995 a. 27, ss. 3782 and 9116 (5); 1997 a. 51; 2009 a. 87; 2011 a. 32; 2025 a. 139.
109.07 Cross-referenceCross-reference: See also ch. DWD 279, Wis. adm. code.
109.07 AnnotationThe application of this section is limited to business closures of employment sites, defined by reference to geography rather than ownership. A transfer of business assets does not constitute a business closing unless it results in either a temporary or permanent shutdown in the operation of the business site. State v. T.J. International, Inc., 2001 WI 76, 244 Wis. 2d 481, 628 N.W.2d 774, 99-2803.
109.07 AnnotationThere is no private cause of action under this section. Henne v. Allis-Chalmers Corp., 660 F. Supp. 1464 (1987).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1984–2001 · leading case: State v. T.J. Int'l, Inc., 2001 WI 76 (Wis. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. T.J. Int'l, Inc., 2001 WI 76 (Wis. 2001). · cites it 41× “This case arises under Wisconsin's Business Closing and Mass Layoff Law, Wis. Stat. § 109.07 (1995-96), 1 and presents the question of whether a "business closing" under the statute includes the sale of business assets where there is no interruption in business operations and…”
Henne v. Allis-Chalmers Corp., 660 F. Supp. 1464 (E.D. Wis. 1987). · cites it 18× “Wis.Stat. § 109.07 (1985-1986). The plaintiffs believe that they are entitled to compensatory and punitive damages under this section because Allis-Chalmers failed to notify the employees of the sale of the compressor operation to A-C sixty days in advance.”
Jacobson v. Am. Tool Cos., Inc., 588 N.W.2d 67 (Wis. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “Section 109.07(4)(c), Stats., states that "[i]f the employe prevails.”
Gen. Drivers & Dairy Employees, Local No. 563 v. Bake Rite Baking Co., 580 F. Supp. 426 (E.D. Wis. 1984). · cites it 10× “Third, the unions argue that by failing to notify the DILHR of the sale, Bake Rite has violated Wis.Stat. § 109.07. That statute provides: Mergers, liquidations, dispositions, re-locations or cessation of operations affecting employes; advance notice required.”
State v. T.J. Int'l, Inc., 2000 WI App 181 (Wis. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 19× “" Wis. Stat. § 109.07 (l)(b). By reference to "an employment site," this definition focuses on what actually occurs at an employment location.”
Peltz v. Wisconsin Dep't of Workforce Dev. (In Re AR Accessories Grp., Inc.), 267 B.R. 583 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 2001). · cites it 2× “§ 109.07 (Wisconsin plant closing law). This investigation was prompted by complaints from Michael Miller, Mayor of the City of West Bend, and Janis Zom-mers, union representative of Local 7915, United Paperworkers International Union, both of whom alleged that there was…”
State Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Wisconsin Bell, Inc., 566 N.W.2d 496 (Wis. Ct. App. 1997). “205(7), STATS, (authorizing Department of Justice to bring a claim on behalf of individuals injured under the laws regulating motor vehicle rustproofing); § 109.07(4)(b), STATS, (plant closings); § 134.”
— Wis. Stat. § 109.07(4)(a) — 1 case
State v. T.J. Int'l, Inc., 2001 WI 76 (Wis. 2001). “This case arises under Wisconsin's Business Closing and Mass Layoff Law, Wis. Stat. § 109.07 (1995-96), 1 and presents the question of whether a "business closing" under the statute includes the sale of business assets where there is no interruption in business operations and…”
— Wis. Stat. § 109.07(4)(b) — 3 cases
State v. T.J. Int'l, Inc., 2001 WI 76 (Wis. 2001). “This case arises under Wisconsin's Business Closing and Mass Layoff Law, Wis. Stat. § 109.07 (1995-96), 1 and presents the question of whether a "business closing" under the statute includes the sale of business assets where there is no interruption in business operations and…”
State Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Wisconsin Bell, Inc., 566 N.W.2d 496 (Wis. Ct. App. 1997). “205(7), STATS, (authorizing Department of Justice to bring a claim on behalf of individuals injured under the laws regulating motor vehicle rustproofing); § 109.07(4)(b), STATS, (plant closings); § 134.”
State v. T.J. Int'l, Inc., 2000 WI App 181 (Wis. Ct. App. 2000). “" Wis. Stat. § 109.07 (l)(b). By reference to "an employment site," this definition focuses on what actually occurs at an employment location.”
— Wis. Stat. § 109.07(4)(c) — 1 case
Jacobson v. Am. Tool Cos., Inc., 588 N.W.2d 67 (Wis. Ct. App. 1998). “Section 109.07(4)(c), Stats., states that "[i]f the employe prevails.”
— Wis. Stat. § 109.07(4)(d) — 1 case
State v. T.J. Int'l, Inc., 2000 WI App 181 (Wis. Ct. App. 2000). “" Wis. Stat. § 109.07 (l)(b). By reference to "an employment site," this definition focuses on what actually occurs at an employment location.”
— Wis. Stat. § 109.07(6) — 1 case
State v. T.J. Int'l, Inc., 2001 WI 76 (Wis. 2001). “This case arises under Wisconsin's Business Closing and Mass Layoff Law, Wis. Stat. § 109.07 (1995-96), 1 and presents the question of whether a "business closing" under the statute includes the sale of business assets where there is no interruption in business operations and…”
— Wis. Stat. § 109.07(l)(a) — 1 case
State v. T.J. Int'l, Inc., 2000 WI App 181 (Wis. Ct. App. 2000). “" Wis. Stat. § 109.07 (l)(b). By reference to "an employment site," this definition focuses on what actually occurs at an employment location.”
— Wis. Stat. § 109.07(l)(b) — 2 cases
State v. T.J. Int'l, Inc., 2001 WI 76 (Wis. 2001). “This case arises under Wisconsin's Business Closing and Mass Layoff Law, Wis. Stat. § 109.07 (1995-96), 1 and presents the question of whether a "business closing" under the statute includes the sale of business assets where there is no interruption in business operations and…”
State v. T.J. Int'l, Inc., 2000 WI App 181 (Wis. Ct. App. 2000). “" Wis. Stat. § 109.07 (l)(b). By reference to "an employment site," this definition focuses on what actually occurs at an employment location.”
— Wis. Stat. § 109.07(l)(f) — 1 case
State v. T.J. Int'l, Inc., 2000 WI App 181 (Wis. Ct. App. 2000). “" Wis. Stat. § 109.07 (l)(b). By reference to "an employment site," this definition focuses on what actually occurs at an employment location.”
— Wis. Stat. § 109.07(lm) — 1 case
State v. T.J. Int'l, Inc., 2000 WI App 181 (Wis. Ct. App. 2000). “" Wis. Stat. § 109.07 (l)(b). By reference to "an employment site," this definition focuses on what actually occurs at an employment location.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.