Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 111.395 (2026)
Judicial review
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
111.395111.395 Judicial review. Findings and orders of the commission under this subchapter are subject to review under ch. 227. Orders of the commission shall have the same force as orders of the department under chs. 103 to 106 and may be enforced as provided in s. 103.005 (11) and (12) or specifically by a suit in equity. In any enforcement action the merits of any order of the commission are not subject to judicial review. Upon such review, or in any enforcement action, the department of justice shall represent the commission.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1986–2026 · leading case: Wis. Bell, Inc. v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 914 N.W.2d 1 (Wis. 2018).
Wis. Bell, Inc. v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 914 N.W.2d 1 (Wis. 2018). “2d ___, ¶84 ("[W]e will review an administrative agency's conclusions of law under the same standard we apply to a circuit court's conclusions of law——de novo.”
City of Madison v. State Dep't of Workforce Dev., 2003 WI 76 (Wis. 2003). “The complaint and investigation procedure is set forth in Wis.”
Edward G. Staats v. Cnty. of Sawyer & Cnty. of Bayfield, 220 F.3d 511 (7th Cir. 2000). “See Wis. Stat. § 111.395 . The *514 state court conducted a review limited to the administrative record, as it was required to do by statute.”
Currie v. State Dep't of Indus., Labor & Human Relations, 565 N.W.2d 253 (Wis. Ct. App. 1997). “5 Section 111.395, Stats., directs that the provisions of Chapter 227 apply to a review of the findings and conclusions *394 which result from the hearing held on a discrimination complaint.”
Jocelyn Riley v. Am. Fam. Mut. Ins. Co., 881 F.2d 368 (7th Cir. 1989). “Wis.Stat. § 111.395. Riley may also seek review of the ERD’s decision by the EEOC, although such review at this point is unlikely given the fact that the EEOC has issued a right to sue letter.”
Mursch v. Van Dorn Co., 627 F. Supp. 1310 (W.D. Wis. 1986). “The act provides that the Department of Industry, Labor and Human Relations shall administer its provisions, and gives the department authority to investigate complaints of discrimination, hold hearings, and to order relief, including back pay.”
Nichols v. Am. Employers Ins., 412 N.W.2d 547 (Wis. Ct. App. 1987). “31 through sec. 111.395, Stats. The Equal Rights Division of the Department *746 found probable cause of sex discrimination.”
Busse v. Gelco Express Corp., 678 F. Supp. 1398 (E.D. Wis. 1988). “Administration of the statute is entrusted to the Department of Industry, Labor and Human Relations (DILHR), Wis.”
Wingra Redi-Mix Inc. v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 2023 WI App 34 (Wis. Ct. App. 2023). “§ 111.395 (2021-22),5 which provides that “[f]indings and orders of the [C]ommission under this subchapter are subject to review under ch.”
Fore Way Express, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Dep't of Indus., Labor & Human Relations, 660 F. Supp. 310 (E.D. Wis. 1987). “Fore Way contends that the issues it seeks to litigate in this court have already been resolved against it by the state administrative law judge and, therefore, that there is no ongoing judicial proceeding to which this court must defer.”
Sherman v. ConAgra Foods Inc (E.D. Wis. 2022). “See Wis. Stat. § 111.395 . Sherman may not proceed in federal court on their retaliation claim under the Wisconsin Fair Employment Act.”
Renée Coleman v. Sun Prairie Area Sch. Dist. (W.D. Wis. 2025). “6, 2021); Wis. Stat. § 111.39 . After the department makes its decision, a dissatisfied party may appeal to the Labor and Industry Review Commission, id.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.