Go Syfert

Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 12.04 (2026)

Communication of political messages

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

12.0412.04 Communication of political messages.

12.04(1)(1) In this section:

12.04(1)(a)(a) “Election campaign period” means:

12.04(1)(a)1.1. In the case of an election for office, the period beginning on the first day for circulation of nomination papers by candidates, or the first day on which candidates would circulate nomination papers were papers to be required, and ending on the day of the election.

12.04(1)(a)2.2. In the case of a referendum, the period beginning on the day on which the question to be voted upon is submitted to the electorate and ending on the day on which the referendum is held.

12.04(1)(b)(b) “Political message” means a message intended for a political purpose or a message which pertains to an issue of public policy of possible concern to the electorate, but does not include a message intended solely for a commercial purpose.

12.04(1)(c)(c) “Residential property” means property occupied or suitable to be occupied for residential purposes and property abutting that property for which the owner or renter is responsible for the maintenance or care. If property is utilized for both residential and nonresidential purposes, “residential property” means only the portion of the property occupied or suitable to be occupied for residential purposes.

12.04(2)(2) Except as provided in ss. 12.03 or 12.035 or as restricted under sub. (4), any individual may place a sign containing a political message upon residential property owned or occupied by that individual during an election campaign period.

12.04(3)(3) Except as provided in sub. (4), no county or municipality may regulate the size, shape, placement or content of any sign containing a political message placed upon residential property during an election campaign period.

12.04(4)(a)(a) A county or municipality may regulate the size, shape or placement of any sign if such regulation is necessary to ensure traffic or pedestrian safety. A county or municipality may regulate the size, shape or placement of any sign having an electrical, mechanical or audio auxiliary.

12.04(4)(b)(b) In addition to regulation under par. (a), a municipality may regulate the size, shape or placement of a sign exceeding 11 square feet in area. This paragraph does not apply to a sign which is affixed to a permanent structure and does not extend beyond the perimeter of the structure, if the sign does not obstruct a window, door, fire escape, ventilation shaft or other area which is required by an applicable building code to remain unobstructed.

12.04(5)(a)(a) The renter of residential property may exercise the same right as the owner to place a sign upon the property under sub. (2) in any area of the property occupied exclusively by the renter. The terms of a lease or other agreement under which residential property is occupied shall control in determining whether property is occupied exclusively by a renter.

12.04(5)(b)(b) The owner of residential property may exercise the right granted under sub. (2) in any portion of the property not occupied exclusively by a renter.

12.04(6)(6) This section does not apply to signs prohibited from being erected under s. 84.30.

12.04 HistoryHistory: 1985 a. 198; 1993 a. 246; 2005 a. 451; 2009 a. 173.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 15 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1988–2025 · leading case: Sauk Cnty. v. Gumz, 2003 WI App 165 (Wis. Ct. App. 2003).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Sauk Cnty. v. Gumz, 2003 WI App 165 (Wis. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 4× “3, "Public Assemblies"; Crawford County Ordinance § 12.04, "Large Assemblies" (1999); Green County Code of Ordinances, ch.”

Lechner v. Barnhart, 321 F. Supp. 2d 1015 (E.D. Wis. 2004). “Lamberta [sic] suggests that the claimant’s functional limitations due to his impairments are of a degree that meets the requirements of sections 12.04 and/or 12.05 of the Listing of Impairments.”

Beth v. Astrue, 494 F. Supp. 2d 979 (E.D. Wis. 2007). “1, § 12.04(B). 1 On the other hand, if the ALJ rates the degree of limitation as “none” or “mild,” he may generally find that the claimant has no severe mental impairment.”

Weston v. Wisconsin Dep't of Workforce Dev., 2007 WI App 167 (Wis. Ct. App. 2007). “Code DWD § 12.04 (1); 9 see also Wis. Stat. § 49.35 (l)(a).”

Weston v. Wis. Dept. of Workforce Dev., 2007 WI App 167 (Wis. Ct. App. 2007). “CODE DWD § 12.04(1); [9] see also WIS. STAT. § 49.”

Ferguson v. Astrue, 541 F. Supp. 2d 1036 (E.D. Wis. 2008). “1, § 12.04. The ALJ concluded that the evidence does not demonstrate that the plaintiffs depression has resulted in more than minimal limitations in her ability to perform basic work activity.”

Linder v. O'Malley (E.D. Wis. 2024). · cites it 3× “1 § 12.04. Nevertheless, Linder contends that the ALJ’s failure to explicitly consider bipolar disorder as a severe impairment supports an inference that the ALJ did not properly evaluate the condition.”

Wisconsin Bank & Trust v. Jim Herman, Inc (Wis. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “13 Section 12.04 of the Partnership Agreement binds all successor partners.”

Morris v. Colvin (E.D. Wis. 2025). · cites it 2× “) At step three, the ALJ found that Morris’s impairments, including her substance abuse, met Section 12.04 of the Listings. (Id. at 22–25.”

Seals v. Saul (E.D. Wis. 2020). “1, §§ 12.04, 12.06.2 If the impairment(s) do not meet or equal a Listing, at step four the ALJ determines whether the claimant can, given his “residual functional capacity” (“RFC”), perform his past relevant work.”

Lamboy v. Khemees (E.D. Wis. 2020). “1, §§ 12.04, 12.06.2 If the impairment(s) do not meet or equal a Listing, at step four the ALJ determines whether the claimant can, given his “residual functional capacity” (“RFC”), perform his past relevant work.”

Elmer v. Saul (E.D. Wis. 2023). “at §12.04(B). A claimant’s mental disorder results in a “marked” limitation when her “functioning in this area independently, appropriately, effectively, and on a sustained basis is seriously limited.”

Show all 15 citing cases →

— Wis. Stat. § 12.04(1) — 1 case

Weston v. Wis. Dept. of Workforce Dev., 2007 WI App 167 (Wis. Ct. App. 2007). “CODE DWD § 12.04(1); [9] see also WIS. STAT. § 49.”

— Wis. Stat. § 12.04(2) — 1 case

Sauk Cnty. v. Gumz, 2003 WI App 165 (Wis. Ct. App. 2003). “3, "Public Assemblies"; Crawford County Ordinance § 12.04, "Large Assemblies" (1999); Green County Code of Ordinances, ch.”

— Wis. Stat. § 12.04(3) — 1 case

Sauk Cnty. v. Gumz, 2003 WI App 165 (Wis. Ct. App. 2003). “3, "Public Assemblies"; Crawford County Ordinance § 12.04, "Large Assemblies" (1999); Green County Code of Ordinances, ch.”

— Wis. Stat. § 12.04(3)(f) — 1 case

Sauk Cnty. v. Gumz, 2003 WI App 165 (Wis. Ct. App. 2003). “3, "Public Assemblies"; Crawford County Ordinance § 12.04, "Large Assemblies" (1999); Green County Code of Ordinances, ch.”

— Wis. Stat. § 12.04(B) — 3 cases

Beth v. Astrue, 494 F. Supp. 2d 979 (E.D. Wis. 2007). “1, § 12.04(B). 1 On the other hand, if the ALJ rates the degree of limitation as “none” or “mild,” he may generally find that the claimant has no severe mental impairment.”

Elmer v. Saul (E.D. Wis. 2023). “at §12.04(B). A claimant’s mental disorder results in a “marked” limitation when her “functioning in this area independently, appropriately, effectively, and on a sustained basis is seriously limited.”

Quackenboss, Trista v. Kijakazi, Kilolo (W.D. Wis. 2024).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.