Wis. Stat. » CHAPTER 126 — AGRICULTURAL PRODUCER SECURITY
Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 126.68 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
126.68126.68 Definitions. In this subchapter:
126.68(1)(1) “Contributing contractor” means any of the following:
126.68(1)(a)(a) A contributing grain dealer, as defined in s. 126.10 (3).
126.68(1)(b)(b) A contributing grain warehouse keeper, as defined in s. 126.25 (2).
126.68(1)(c)(c) A contributing milk contractor, as defined in s. 126.40 (1).
126.68(1)(d)(d) A contributing vegetable contractor, as defined in s. 126.55 (4).
126.68(2)(2) “Depositor” has the meaning given in s. 126.25 (5).
126.68(3)(3) “Grain dealer” has the meaning given in s. 126.10 (9).
126.68(4)(4) “Grain producer” has the meaning given in s. 126.10 (10).
126.68(5)(5) “Grain warehouse keeper” has the meaning given in s. 126.25 (9).
126.68(6)(6) “Milk contractor” has the meaning given in s. 126.40 (8).
126.68(7)(7) “Milk producer” has the meaning given in s. 126.40 (10).
126.68(8)(8) “Producer grain” has the meaning given in s. 126.10 (14).
126.68(9)(9) “Producer milk” has the meaning given s. 126.40 (14).
126.68(10)(10) “Vegetable contractor” has the meaning given in s. 126.55 (14).
126.68(11)(11) “Vegetable procurement contract” has the meaning given in s. 126.55 (15).
126.68(12)(12) “Vegetable producer” has the meaning given in s. 126.55 (16).
126.68 HistoryHistory: 2001 a. 16.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2008–2008 · leading case: Eichenseer v. Madison-Dane Cnty. Tavern League, Inc., 2008 WI 38 (Wis. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Eichenseer v. Madison-Dane Cnty. Tavern League, Inc., 2008 WI 38 (Wis. 2008). · cites it 2× “Wis. Stat. § 126.68 (4)(b). This is anticompetitive.”
Eichenseer v. Madison Cnty. Tavern League, 2008 WI 38 (Wis. 2008). · cites it 2× “Wis. Stat. § 126.68 (4)(b). This is anticompetitive.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.