Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 137.11 (2026)
Definitions
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
137.11(1)(1) “Agreement” means the bargain of the parties in fact, as found in their language or inferred from other circumstances and from rules, regulations, and procedures given the effect of agreements under laws otherwise applicable to a particular transaction.
137.11(2)(2) “Automated transaction” means a transaction conducted or performed, in whole or in part, by electronic means or by the use of electronic records, in which the acts or records of one or both parties are not reviewed by an individual in the ordinary course in forming a contract, performing under an existing contract, or fulfilling an obligation required by the transaction.
137.11(3)(3) “Computer program” means a set of statements or instructions to be used directly or indirectly in an information processing system in order to bring about a certain result.
137.11(4)(4) “Contract” means the total legal obligation resulting from the parties’ agreement as affected by this chapter and other applicable law.
137.11(5)(5) “Electronic” means relating to technology having electrical, digital, magnetic, wireless, optical, electromagnetic, or similar capabilities.
137.11(6)(6) “Electronic agent” means a computer program or an electronic or other automated means used independently to initiate an action or respond to electronic records or performances in whole or in part, without review or action by an individual.
137.11(7)(7) “Electronic record” means a record that is created, generated, sent, communicated, received, or stored by electronic means.
137.11(8)(8) “Electronic signature” means an electronic sound, symbol, or process attached to or logically associated with a record and executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the record.
137.11(9)(a)(a) An agency, department, board, commission, office, authority, institution, or instrumentality of the federal government or of a state or of a political subdivision of a state or special purpose district within a state, regardless of the branch or branches of government in which it is located.
137.11(9)(d)(d) Any body within one or more of the entities specified in pars. (a) to (c) that is created or authorized to be created by the constitution, by law, or by action of one or more of the entities specified in pars. (a) to (c).
137.11(10)(10) “Information” means data, text, images, sounds, codes, computer programs, software, databases, or the like.
137.11(11)(11) “Information processing system” means an electronic system for creating, generating, sending, receiving, storing, displaying, or processing information.
137.11(12)(12) “Record” means information that is inscribed on a tangible medium or that is stored in an electronic or other medium and is retrievable in perceivable form.
137.11(13)(13) “Security procedure” means a procedure employed for the purpose of verifying that an electronic signature, record, or performance is that of a specific person or for detecting changes or errors in the information in an electronic record. The term includes a procedure that requires the use of algorithms or other codes, identifying words or numbers, encryption, callback, or other acknowledgment procedures.
137.11(14)(14) “State” means a state of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, or any territory or insular possession subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. The term includes an Indian tribe or band, or Alaskan native village, which is recognized by federal law or formally acknowledged by a state.
137.11(15)(15) “Transaction” means an action or set of actions occurring between 2 or more persons relating to the conduct of business, commercial, or governmental affairs.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2021–2022 · leading case: Lockridge v. State of Wisconsin (E.D. Wis. 2022).
Lockridge v. State of Wisconsin (E.D. Wis. 2022). “The plaintiffs assert that URLTA was intended to apply to government or public agencies acting as landlords, but that “[t]here is no record with any Federal or State or subdivision thereof that Subject Property is ‘in or within the state’ of Wisconsin according to statutory…”
Butler v. State of Wisconsin (E.D. Wis. 2022). “The plaintiffs assert that URLTA was intended to apply to government or public agencies acting as landlords, but that “[t]here is no record with any Federal or State or subdivision thereof that Subject Property is ‘in or within the state’ of Wisconsin according to statutory…”
Butler v. Barrett (E.D. Wis. 2022). “The plaintiffs assert that URLTA was intended to apply to government or public agencies acting as landlords, but that “[t]here is no record with any Federal or State or subdivision thereof that Subject Property is ‘in or within the state’ of Wisconsin according to statutory…”
Bruske, Ryea v. Capitol Watertown Sprechers, LLC (W.D. Wis. 2021). “” Wis. Stat. § 137.11 (8). Here, employees must enter their tips while signed into the POS system under their own name.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.