Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 14.04 (2026)

Reports to legislature

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
14.0414.04Reports to legislature. At the commencement of each regular session of the legislature, the governor shall communicate to the chief clerk of each house of the legislature, for distribution to the legislature under s. 13.172 (2), the reports of all state officers, commissions, boards, and departments required by law to report to the governor, including the reports of state officers whose terms of office have expired covering the transactions in their respective offices from June 30 in the last year of their terms, and, at the time of communicating said reports, shall render to the chief clerk of each house of the legislature, for distribution to the legislature under s. 13.172 (2), a statement of all expenditures made by the governor out of any contingent fund appropriated for the contingent expenses of the office of the governor. Biennially, the governor shall submit to the chief clerk of each house of the legislature, for distribution to the legislature under s. 13.172 (2), a report on the condition of each of the public institutions of this state which are supported in whole or in part by appropriations by the state with such recommendations as deemed proper.
14.04 HistoryHistory: 1977 c. 29 s. 1649; 1977 c. 273; 1987 a. 186.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1989–2022 · leading case: Hillis v. Vill. of Fox Point Bd. of Appeals, 2005 WI App 106 (Wis. Ct. App. 2005).
Hillis v. Vill. of Fox Point Bd. of Appeals, 2005 WI App 106 (Wis. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 9× “, Code ("VFPC") § 14.04. ¶ 4. The Fox Point Building Board refused to apply the fifty percent of value limitation in VFPC § 14.”
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Van Kylen (In Re Van Kylen), 98 B.R. 455 (Bankr. W.D. Wis. 1989). “Worley, Possessory Security Interests § 14.04[2][a][ii] at 14-48. 8 In In re Copeland, 531 F.”
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Lake of the Torches Econ. Dev. Corp., 677 F. Supp. 2d 1056 (E.D. Wis. 2010). “See Trust Indenture, § 14.04 (Separability of Indenture Provisions).”
O'CONNOR v. Cindy Gerke & Assocs., Inc., 300 F. Supp. 2d 759 (W.D. Wis. 2002). “See 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 14.04[A], *771 Defendant reported on its 1999 and 2000 tax returns gross revenues of $1,135,010 and $1,373,154, respectively.”
Wisconsin Elec. Employees Health & Welfare Plan v. Lewins Elec. LLC (E.D. Wis. 2021). · cites it 6× “Lewins Electric cites to CBA Section 14.04: “The Employer agrees to deduct and forward to the Financial Secretary of the Local Union – upon receipt of a voluntary written authorization – the additional working dues from the pay of each IBEW member.”
Town of Little Wolf v. Waupaca Cnty., 927 N.W.2d 154 (Wis. Ct. App. 2019). “34, § 14.04(1)(b)(9) provides: If following the close of a hearing, the Board [of Adjustment] finds it necessary or desirable to receive additional information, evidence or arguments which may have a bearing upon the Board's decision, it shall reconvene a public hearing, with…”
Waupaca Cnty. v. DeAnn R. Golla (Wis. Ct. App. 2022). “34, § 14.04(6) (requiring for a variance a Class 2 notice under WIS.”
Canyon Custom Home Builders Inc v. Somerset Condo. Ass'n Inc (E.D. Wis. 2021). “XVI, § 14.04).) As this provision makes clear, the Declaration creates a duty only to unit owners.”
— Wis. Stat. § 14.04(1)(b)(9) — 1 case
Town of Little Wolf v. Waupaca Cnty., 927 N.W.2d 154 (Wis. Ct. App. 2019). “34, § 14.04(1)(b)(9) provides: If following the close of a hearing, the Board [of Adjustment] finds it necessary or desirable to receive additional information, evidence or arguments which may have a bearing upon the Board's decision, it shall reconvene a public hearing, with…”
— Wis. Stat. § 14.04(6) — 1 case
Waupaca Cnty. v. DeAnn R. Golla (Wis. Ct. App. 2022). “34, § 14.04(6) (requiring for a variance a Class 2 notice under WIS.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.