Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 157.065 (2026)
Location and ownership of cemeteries
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
157.065(2)(a)1.1. Within a recorded plat or recorded addition to a plat of any city or village, if the cemetery is within one mile of a building in the plat;
157.065(2)(a)2.2. Outside a recorded plat or recorded addition to a plat of any city or village if the cemetery is within 3,300 feet of an inhabited dwelling that is located within a recorded plat or addition, unless the city or village consents;
157.065(2)(a)3.3. Within 250 feet of any habitable dwelling, publicly owned building or school, unless the cemetery is establishing an extension on property it has owned continually since June 18, 1929; or
157.065(2)(a)4.4. Within 3,300 feet of any of the following state facilities, without the consent of the state:
157.065(2)(b)(b) Paragraph (a) does not apply to enlargements under sub. (3m) or s. 157.064 (2) or (3).
157.065(3)(a)(a) Any incorporated college of a religious order in a 4th class city may establish a private cemetery within the city on land the college owns to bury members of the religious order, if the common council consents and if each person owning a private building within 825 feet of the proposed cemetery consents.
157.065(3)(b)(b) Any private military academy that provides an educational program for grades 7 to 12 in a 4th class city may establish a private cemetery within the city on land that the military academy owns, if the common council consents. No mausoleum within a cemetery established under this paragraph may exceed 3,500 square feet in area.
157.065(3m)(a)(a) Any cemetery in a village may enlarge with the consent of the village board and of the owners of each building within 250 feet of the addition.
157.065(3m)(b)(b) Any cemetery in a 3rd or 4th class city may enlarge with the consent of the common council.
157.065(3m)(c)(c) Notwithstanding pars. (a) and (d), any cemetery established before April 30, 1887, in a village and located within 100 feet of the village limits may extend to the village limits with the consent of the village board.
157.065(3m)(d)(d) Notwithstanding pars. (a) to (c), any cemetery established before April 30, 1887, may expand as provided in s. 157.064.
157.065 HistoryHistory: 1975 c. 39, 106; 1975 c. 189 s. 99 (2); 1975 c. 200, 422, 430; 1977 c. 83; 1977 c. 449 s. 497; 1979 c. 221; 1981 c. 20; 1985 a. 316 ss. 18, 25; Stats. 1985 s. 157.065; 1987 a. 190; 1989 a. 43, 307; 1993 a. 98, 112; 1995 a. 77; 1999 a. 9; 2001 a. 103, 107; 2005 a. 344.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2018–2018 · leading case: DeWitt v. Ferries, 921 N.W.2d 188 (Wis. 2018).
DeWitt v. Ferries, 921 N.W.2d 188 (Wis. 2018). “¶ 32 For example, Wis. Stat. § 157.065 (1) details what entities can organize a cemetery and provides for the recognition of land that was used as a cemetery prior to 1864.”
Melvin DeWitt v. Earl G. Ferries, 2018 WI 117 (Wis. 2018). “" Wis. Stat. § 157.065 (1)(a). ¶35 Second, there are no existing facts of record indicating that the parcel has been organized or operated as a cemetery by a cemetery authority.”
— Wis. Stat. § 157.065(1) — 2 cases
DeWitt v. Ferries, 921 N.W.2d 188 (Wis. 2018). “¶ 32 For example, Wis. Stat. § 157.065 (1) details what entities can organize a cemetery and provides for the recognition of land that was used as a cemetery prior to 1864.”
Melvin DeWitt v. Earl G. Ferries, 2018 WI 117 (Wis. 2018). “" Wis. Stat. § 157.065 (1)(a). ¶35 Second, there are no existing facts of record indicating that the parcel has been organized or operated as a cemetery by a cemetery authority.”
— Wis. Stat. § 157.065(1)(b) — 1 case
Melvin DeWitt v. Earl G. Ferries, 2018 WI 117 (Wis. 2018). “" Wis. Stat. § 157.065 (1)(a). ¶35 Second, there are no existing facts of record indicating that the parcel has been organized or operated as a cemetery by a cemetery authority.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.