Wis. Stat. » CHAPTER 175 — MISCELLANEOUS POLICE PROVISIONS
Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 175.50 (2026)

Eyewitness identification procedures

✓ laws through the 2025-26 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
175.50175.50 Eyewitness identification procedures.
175.50(1)(1) In this section:
175.50(1)(a)(a) “Law enforcement agency” has the meaning given in s. 165.83 (1) (b).
175.50(1)(b)(b) “Suspect” means a person suspected of committing a crime.
175.50(2)(2) Each law enforcement agency shall adopt written policies for using an eyewitness to identify a suspect upon viewing the suspect in person or upon viewing a representation of the suspect. The policies shall be designed to reduce the potential for erroneous identifications by eyewitnesses in criminal cases.
175.50(3)(3) A law enforcement agency shall biennially review policies adopted under this section.
175.50(4)(4) In developing and revising policies under this section, a law enforcement agency shall consider model policies and policies adopted by other jurisdictions.
175.50(5)(5) A law enforcement agency shall consider including in policies adopted under this section practices to enhance the objectivity and reliability of eyewitness identifications and to minimize the possibility of mistaken identifications, including the following:
175.50(5)(a)(a) To the extent feasible, having a person who does not know the identity of the suspect administer the eyewitness’ viewing of individuals or representations.
175.50(5)(b)(b) To the extent feasible, showing individuals or representations sequentially rather than simultaneously to an eyewitness.
175.50(5)(c)(c) Minimizing factors that influence an eyewitness to identify a suspect or overstate his or her confidence level in identifying a suspect, including verbal or nonverbal reactions of the person administering the eyewitness’ viewing of individuals or representations.
175.50(5)(d)(d) Documenting the procedure by which the eyewitness views the suspect or a representation of the suspect and documenting the results or outcome of the procedure.
175.50 HistoryHistory: 2005 a. 60.
175.50 AnnotationInstituting Innocence Reform: Wisconsin’s New Government Experiment. Kruse. 2006 WLR 645.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2007–2020 · leading case: State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, 740 N.W.2d 404.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, 740 N.W.2d 404. · cites it 3× “Second, we observe that the legislature has since enacted Wis. Stat. § 175.50 (effective December 30,2005), which requires law enforcement agencies to adopt written policies for eyewitness identification.”
United States v. John A. Ford, 683 F.3d 761 (7th Cir. 2012). “52(b)(2); Wis. Stat. § 175.50 (5)(b); Letter from N.”
State v. Stephan I. Roberson, No. 2017AP001894-CR (Wis. Dec. 2, 2019). · cites it 3× “Five months after Dubose was decided, the legislature enacted Wis. Stat. § 175.50 , requiring law enforcement agencies to adopt model policies to minimize the possibility of mistaken eyewitness identifications.”
State v. Stephan I. Roberson, No. 2017AP001894-CR (Wis. Dec. 3, 2019). · cites it 3× “Five months after Dubose was decided, the legislature enacted Wis. Stat. § 175.50 , requiring law enforcement agencies to adopt model policies to minimize the possibility of mistaken eyewitness identifications.”
State v. Andre David Nash, 939 N.W.2d 880 (Wis. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 2× “§ 175.50, and the court failed to provide any other basis for this finding.”
Wis. Stat. § 175.50(2): 1 case
State v. Andre David Nash, 939 N.W.2d 880 (Wis. Ct. App. 2020). “§ 175.50, and the court failed to provide any other basis for this finding.”
Wis. Stat. § 175.50(4): 1 case
State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, 740 N.W.2d 404. “Second, we observe that the legislature has since enacted Wis. Stat. § 175.50 (effective December 30,2005), which requires law enforcement agencies to adopt written policies for eyewitness identification.”
Wis. Stat. § 175.50(5)(b): 2 cases
State v. Stephan I. Roberson, No. 2017AP001894-CR (Wis. Dec. 2, 2019). “Five months after Dubose was decided, the legislature enacted Wis. Stat. § 175.50 , requiring law enforcement agencies to adopt model policies to minimize the possibility of mistaken eyewitness identifications.”
State v. Stephan I. Roberson, No. 2017AP001894-CR (Wis. Dec. 3, 2019). “Five months after Dubose was decided, the legislature enacted Wis. Stat. § 175.50 , requiring law enforcement agencies to adopt model policies to minimize the possibility of mistaken eyewitness identifications.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.