Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 20.927 (2026)
Subsidy of abortions prohibited
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
20.927(1g)(1g) In this section, “abortion” means the intentional destruction of the life of an unborn child, and “unborn child” means a human being from the time of conception until it is born alive.
20.927(1m)(1m) Except as provided under subs. (2) and (3), no funds of this state or of any county, city, village, town or long-term care district under s. 46.2895 or of any subdivision or agency of this state, including an authority created in ch. 233, or of any subdivision or agency of any county, city, village or town and no federal funds passing through the state treasury shall be authorized for or paid to a physician or surgeon or a hospital, clinic or other medical facility for the performance of an abortion.
20.927(2)(a)(a) This section does not apply to the performance by a physician of an abortion which is directly and medically necessary to save the life of the woman or in a case of sexual assault or incest, provided that prior thereto the physician signs a certification which so states, and provided that, in the case of sexual assault or incest the crime has been reported to the law enforcement authorities. The certification shall be affixed to the claim form or invoice when submitted to any agency or fiscal intermediary of the state for payment, and shall specify and attest to the direct medical necessity of such abortion upon the best clinical judgment of the physician or attest to his or her belief that sexual assault or incest has occurred.
20.927(2)(b)(b) This section does not apply to the performance by a physician of an abortion if, due to a medical condition existing prior to the abortion, the physician determines that the abortion is directly and medically necessary to prevent grave, long-lasting physical health damage to the woman, provided that prior thereto the physician signs a certification which so states. The certification shall be affixed to the claim form or invoice when submitted to any agency or fiscal intermediary of the state for payment, and shall specify and attest to the direct medical necessity of such abortion upon the best clinical judgment of the physician.
20.927(3)(3) This section does not apply to the authorization or payment of funds to a physician or surgeon or a hospital, clinic or medical facility for or in connection with the prescription of a drug or the insertion of a device to prevent the implantation of the fertilized ovum.
20.927 AnnotationThis section’s restrictions on state funds does not apply to Public Employee Trust Fund monies used to fund state employee insurance plans. OAG 1-95.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1979–2025 · leading case: Monroe Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs. v. Kelli B., 2004 WI 48 (Wis. 2004).
Monroe Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs. v. Kelli B., 2004 WI 48 (Wis. 2004). “[5] See Wis. Stat. §§ 20.927 (2) and 253.10(3m)(b)(1).”
Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Van Hollen, 738 F.3d 786 (7th Cir. 2013). “8985 (prohibiting coverage of abortions by health plans offered through health benefit exchanges); Wis. Stat. Ann. § 20.927 (prohibiting state or municipal subsidies for the performance of abortions).”
Doe v. Percy, 476 F. Supp. 324 (W.D. Wis. 1979). “2d 528 (1976) upheld an abortion funding regulation more restrictive than the one at issue here, I am foreclosed from considering the constitutionality of the funding restrictions enacted in Wis.Stat. § 20.927. 1 After analyzing the way in which the issue was framed by the lower…”
State Ex Rel. Angela M.W. v. Kruzicki, 541 N.W.2d 482 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995). “, § 20.927(4), STATS., pertaining to the prohibited subsidy of abortions; § 46.”
Josh Kaul v. Joel Urmanski, as DA for Sheboygan Cnty., WI, 2025 WI 32 (Wis. 2025). “§ 20.927, was passed in 1977 and prohibited state, county, or municipal funds (as well as federal funds that passed through the state treasury) from being used to fund abortions except in three circumstances: (1) when the abortion is “directly and medically necessary to save the…”
People Ex Rel. Hansen v. Phelan, 628 N.E.2d 160 (Ill. App. Ct. 1993). “2 (Michie 1985); Wis. Stat. §§20.927 , 59.07(136), 66.04(l)(m) (West 1988); Wyo.”
— Wis. Stat. § 20.927(2) — 1 case
Josh Kaul v. Joel Urmanski, as DA for Sheboygan Cnty., WI, 2025 WI 32 (Wis. 2025). “§ 20.927, was passed in 1977 and prohibited state, county, or municipal funds (as well as federal funds that passed through the state treasury) from being used to fund abortions except in three circumstances: (1) when the abortion is “directly and medically necessary to save the…”
— Wis. Stat. § 20.927(2)(a) — 1 case
Josh Kaul v. Joel Urmanski, as DA for Sheboygan Cnty., WI, 2025 WI 32 (Wis. 2025). “§ 20.927, was passed in 1977 and prohibited state, county, or municipal funds (as well as federal funds that passed through the state treasury) from being used to fund abortions except in three circumstances: (1) when the abortion is “directly and medically necessary to save the…”
— Wis. Stat. § 20.927(4) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Angela M.W. v. Kruzicki, 541 N.W.2d 482 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995). “, § 20.927(4), STATS., pertaining to the prohibited subsidy of abortions; § 46.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.