Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 218.14 (2026)
Service fees
✓ laws through the 2025-26 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
218.14(1)(1) A dealer may not assess a purchaser of a recreational vehicle an additional service fee or charge for performing a vehicle inspection or completing a form that is related to the sale of the recreational vehicle and required by law unless the dealer discloses the fee or charge to the purchaser and provides a statement on the purchase or lease contract in substantially the following form: “A service fee or charge is not required by law but may be charged to recreational vehicle purchasers or lessees for services related to compliance with state and federal laws, verifications, and public safety and must be reasonable.” The amount of a service fee or charge assessed by a dealer under this subsection may not be higher than the amount initially disclosed.
218.14(2)(2) Upon request from a purchaser of a recreational vehicle, a dealer shall provide a written list of the services for which a service fee or charge under sub. (1) is assessed.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 1991–1991 · leading case: Lightcap v. Steenberg Homes, Inc., 466 N.W.2d 904 (Wis. 1991).
Lightcap v. Steenberg Homes, Inc., 466 N.W.2d 904 (Wis. 1991). “715 because they were not "incidental or consequential" damages, and (c) that noncompliance with the written warranty did not constitute a violation of sec. 218.14, Stats. This court granted Lightcap's petition for review pursuant to sec.”
Wis. Stat. § 218.14(1): 1 case
Lightcap v. Steenberg Homes, Inc., 466 N.W.2d 904 (Wis. 1991). “715 because they were not "incidental or consequential" damages, and (c) that noncompliance with the written warranty did not constitute a violation of sec. 218.14, Stats. This court granted Lightcap's petition for review pursuant to sec.”
Wis. Stat. § 218.14(1)(c): 1 case
Lightcap v. Steenberg Homes, Inc., 466 N.W.2d 904 (Wis. 1991). “715 because they were not "incidental or consequential" damages, and (c) that noncompliance with the written warranty did not constitute a violation of sec. 218.14, Stats. This court granted Lightcap's petition for review pursuant to sec.”
Wis. Stat. § 218.14(l)(c): 1 case
Lightcap v. Steenberg Homes, Inc., 466 N.W.2d 904 (Wis. 1991). “715 because they were not "incidental or consequential" damages, and (c) that noncompliance with the written warranty did not constitute a violation of sec. 218.14, Stats. This court granted Lightcap's petition for review pursuant to sec.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.