Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 295.19 (2026)

Enforcement; remedies; penalties

✓ laws through the 2025-26 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
295.19295.19 Enforcement; remedies; penalties.
295.19(1)(1) Orders; enforcement. The governing body of a county, city, village or town that has a nonmetallic mining reclamation ordinance that complies with s. 295.13 or 295.14, or an agent designated by that governing body, may do any of the following:
295.19(1)(a)(a) Issue an order requiring an operator to comply with, or to cease violating, this subchapter, rules promulgated under this subchapter, the nonmetallic mining reclamation ordinance, a nonmetallic mining reclamation permit or an approved nonmetallic mining reclamation plan.
295.19(1)(b)(b) Issue an order suspending or revoking a nonmetallic mining reclamation permit as authorized in the nonmetallic mining reclamation ordinance.
295.19(1)(c)(c) Issue an order directing an operator to immediately cease an activity regulated under this subchapter, under rules promulgated under this subchapter or under the nonmetallic mining reclamation ordinance until the necessary nonmetallic mining reclamation plan approval is obtained.
295.19(1)(d)(d) Submit orders to abate violations of the nonmetallic mining reclamation ordinance to the district attorney, the corporation counsel, the municipal attorney or the attorney general for enforcement. The district attorney, the corporation counsel, the municipal attorney or the attorney general may enforce those orders.
295.19(2)(2) Department orders. The department may issue an order directing the immediate cessation of an activity regulated under this subchapter until the nonmetallic mining site complies with the nonmetallic mining reclamation standards established under s. 295.12 (1) (a).
295.19(3)(3) Penalties.
295.19(3)(a)(a) Any person who violates the rules promulgated under s. 295.12 (1) (a) or an order issued under sub. (2) may be required to forfeit not less than $25 nor more than $1,000 for each violation. Each day of continued violation is a separate offense. While an order issued under this subchapter is suspended, stayed or enjoined, this penalty does not accrue.
295.19(3)(b)1.1. Except for the violations enumerated in par. (a), any person who violates this subchapter or any rule promulgated or any plan approval order issued under this subchapter shall forfeit not less than $10 nor more than $5,000 for each violation. Each day of continued violation is a separate offense. While an order is suspended, stayed or enjoined, this penalty does not accrue.
295.19(3)(b)2.2. In addition to the penalties provided under subd. 1., the court may award the department of justice the reasonable and necessary expenses of the investigation and prosecution of the violation, including attorney fees. The department of justice shall deposit in the state treasury for deposit into the general fund all moneys that the court awards to the department or the state under this subdivision. The costs of investigation and the expenses of prosecution, including attorney fees, shall be credited to the appropriation account under s. 20.455 (1) (gh).
295.19 HistoryHistory: 1995 a. 227 s. 810, 995; 1997 a. 27; 2001 a. 109; 2003 a. 309.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2020–2020 · leading case: Wisconsin Legislature v. Andrea Palm, 2020 WI 42, 942 N.W.2d 900.
Wisconsin Legislature v. Andrea Palm, 2020 WI 42, 942 N.W.2d 900. · cites it 2× “87(4) (same but for non- permit holders); Wis. Stat. § 295.19 (3)(a)-(b) (authorizing penalties for violation of any order issued by DNR pursuant to nonmetallic mining reclamation provisions); § 295.”
Wisconsin Legislature v. Andrea Palm, 2020 WI 42, 391 Wis. 2d 497. · cites it 2× “87(4) (same but for non- permit holders); Wis. Stat. § 295.19 (3)(a)-(b) (authorizing penalties for violation of any order issued by DNR pursuant to nonmetallic mining reclamation provisions); § 295.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.