Wis. Stat. » CHAPTER 347 — EQUIPMENT OF VEHICLES
Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 347.413 (2026)

Ignition interlock device tampering; failure to install

✓ laws through the 2025-26 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
347.413347.413 Ignition interlock device tampering; failure to install.
347.413(1)(1) No person may remove, disconnect, tamper with, or otherwise circumvent the operation of an ignition interlock device installed in response to the court order under s. 346.65 (6), 1999 stats., or s. 343.301 (1), 2007 stats., or s. 343.301 (1g), or fail to have the ignition interlock device installed as ordered by the court, or violate a court order under s. 343.301 (1g) restricting the person’s operating privilege. This subsection does not apply to the removal of an ignition interlock device upon the expiration of the order requiring the motor vehicle to be so equipped or to necessary repairs to a malfunctioning ignition interlock device by a person authorized by the department.
Down
Up
347.413(3)(3) The department shall design a warning label which shall be affixed to each ignition interlock device upon installation. The label shall provide notice of the penalties for tampering with or circumventing the operation of the ignition interlock device under sub. (1) and s. 343.10 (5) (a) 3.
Effective date noteNOTE: This section is renumbered to s. 343.302 and amended eff. 9-1-27 by 2025 Wis. Act 210.
347.413 HistoryHistory: 1991 a. 277; 1993 a. 213; 1999 a. 109; 2001 a. 16 ss. 3445f, 3445g, 4060hd, 4060hw, 4060hy; 2009 a. 100, 121; 2017 a. 124; 2025 a. 210.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: Roehl v. Kaul, No. 2:22-cv-00410 (E.D. Wis. May 9, 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Roehl v. Kaul, No. 2:22-cv-00410 (E.D. Wis. May 9, 2022). · cites it 4× “1 According to the Wisconsin Circuit Court Access website, Roehl has four open criminal cases in which he has been charged with violating Wis. Stat. §347.413 (1). See Wisconsin Circuit Court Access, https://wcca.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.