Notes of Decisions
Cintas Corp. No. 2 v. Becker Prop. Servs. LLC, 914 N.W.2d 76 (Wis. 2018).
· cites it 15× “¶57 The standard for conspicuousness in indemnity contracts is set forth in Wis. Stat. § 401.201 (2)(f).1 Id., ¶28. A term is "conspicuous" if any of the following apply: 1 At the time Deminsky was decided, this conspicuousness standard was set forth in Wis.”
Deminsky v. Arlington Plastics Mach., 2003 WI 15 (Wis. 2003).
· cites it 4× “Because indemnity contracts in which parties agree to indemnify the indemnitee for the indemnitee's own negligence are, like exculpatory contracts, to be strictly construed, we now hold that the conspicuousness standards in Wis. Stat. 401.201(10) are required for indemnity…”
Nat'l Operating, L.P. v. Mut. Life Ins., 2001 WI 87 (Wis. 2001).
· cites it 4× “[9] Section 1-201(37) ( Wis. Stat. § 401.201 (37)) provides in relevant part that "`Security interest' means an interest in personal property or fixtures that secures payment or performance of an obligation.”
Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Klomsten, 911 N.W.2d 364 (Wis. Ct. App. 2018).
· cites it 2× “A note endorsed in blank is payable to the bearer and is negotiated by transfer of possession alone.”
Dow Fam., LLC v. PHH Mortg. Corp., 2013 WI App 114 (Wis. Ct. App. 2013).
· cites it 4× “" Wis. Stat. § 401.201 (2)(cm). "Holder" means "[t]he person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that is the person in possession.”
City of Racine v. Waste Facility Siting Bd., 575 N.W.2d 712 (Wis. 1998).
· cites it 4× “[5] See also Wis. Stat. § 401.201 (1), a general provision of the Uniform Commercial Code expressly defining "action" to include a counterclaim.”
Rascar, Inc. v. Bank of Oregon, 275 N.W.2d 108 (Wis. Ct. App. 1978).
· cites it 4× “, refers to the signature of the “customer.” A customer is any person having an account with a bank.”
— Wis. Stat. § 401.201(10) — 3 cases
Deminsky v. Arlington Plastics Mach., 2003 WI 15 (Wis. 2003).
“Because indemnity contracts in which parties agree to indemnify the indemnitee for the indemnitee's own negligence are, like exculpatory contracts, to be strictly construed, we now hold that the conspicuousness standards in Wis. Stat. 401.201(10) are required for indemnity…”
— Wis. Stat. § 401.201(14) — 2 cases
— Wis. Stat. § 401.201(19) — 5 cases
— Wis. Stat. § 401.201(2)(cm) — 1 case
— Wis. Stat. § 401.201(2)(f) — 2 cases
Cintas Corp. No. 2 v. Becker Prop. Servs. LLC, 914 N.W.2d 76 (Wis. 2018).
“¶57 The standard for conspicuousness in indemnity contracts is set forth in Wis. Stat. § 401.201 (2)(f).1 Id., ¶28. A term is "conspicuous" if any of the following apply: 1 At the time Deminsky was decided, this conspicuousness standard was set forth in Wis.”
— Wis. Stat. § 401.201(2)(k) — 1 case
— Wis. Stat. § 401.201(2)(km) — 6 cases
Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Klomsten, 911 N.W.2d 364 (Wis. Ct. App. 2018).
“A note endorsed in blank is payable to the bearer and is negotiated by transfer of possession alone.”
— Wis. Stat. § 401.201(20) — 3 cases
— Wis. Stat. § 401.201(23m) — 1 case
— Wis. Stat. § 401.201(25a) — 1 case
— Wis. Stat. § 401.201(3) — 1 case
— Wis. Stat. § 401.201(30) — 1 case
Rascar, Inc. v. Bank of Oregon, 275 N.W.2d 108 (Wis. Ct. App. 1978).
“, refers to the signature of the “customer.” A customer is any person having an account with a bank.”
— Wis. Stat. § 401.201(31) — 1 case
— Wis. Stat. § 401.201(32) — 1 case
— Wis. Stat. § 401.201(37) — 6 cases
— Wis. Stat. § 401.201(37)(b) — 2 cases
— Wis. Stat. § 401.201(40) — 1 case
— Wis. Stat. § 401.201(43) — 1 case
— Wis. Stat. § 401.201(44) — 1 case
— Wis. Stat. § 401.201(44)(a) — 1 case
— Wis. Stat. § 401.201(44)(d) — 2 cases
— Wis. Stat. § 401.201(9) — 3 cases
— Wis. Stat. § 401.201(f) — 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.