Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 632.748 (2026)
Prohibiting discrimination
✓ laws through the 2025-26 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
632.748(1)(a)(a) Subject to subs. (3) and (4), an insurer may not establish rules for the eligibility of any individual to enroll, or for the continued eligibility of any individual to remain enrolled, under a group health benefit plan based on any of the following factors with respect to the individual or a dependent of the individual:
632.748(1)(a)7.7. Evidence of insurability, including conditions arising out of acts of domestic violence.
632.748(1)(b)(b) For purposes of par. (a), rules for eligibility to enroll under a group health benefit plan include rules defining any applicable waiting periods for enrollment.
632.748(2)(2) An insurer offering a group health benefit plan may not require any individual, as a condition of enrollment or continued enrollment under the plan, to pay, on the basis of any health status-related factor with respect to the individual or a dependent of the individual, a premium or contribution that is greater than the premium or contribution for a similarly situated individual enrolled under the plan.
632.748(3)(3) To the extent consistent with s. 632.746, sub. (1) shall not be construed to do any of the following:
632.748(3)(a)(a) Require a group health benefit plan to provide particular benefits other than those provided under the terms of the plan.
632.748(3)(b)(b) Prevent a group health benefit plan from establishing limitations or restrictions on the amount, level, extent or nature of benefits or coverage for similarly situated individuals enrolled under the plan.
632.748(4)(a)(a) Restrict the amount that an insurer may charge an employer for coverage under a group health benefit plan.
632.748(4)(b)(b) Prevent an insurer offering a group health benefit plan from establishing premium discounts or rebates, or from modifying otherwise applicable copayments or deductibles, in return for adherence to programs of health promotion and disease prevention.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2010–2010 · leading case: Kenseth v. Dean Health Plan, Inc., 610 F.3d 452 (7th Cir. 2010).
Kenseth v. Dean Health Plan, Inc., 610 F.3d 452 (7th Cir. 2010). “” Wis. Stat. § 632.748 (3). The exclusion that Dean relied on here is properly understood as a restriction on the nature of benefits provided rather than one based on a preexisting condition.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.