Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 8.04 (2026)
Nomination paper signatures
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
8.048.04 Nomination paper signatures. If any person signs nomination papers for 2 candidates for the same office in the same election at different times, the earlier signature is valid and the later signature is invalid. If any person circulates a nomination paper for 2 candidates for the same office in the same election at different times, the earlier paper is valid and the later paper is invalid.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1969–2026 · leading case: Emjay Inv. Co. v. Vill. of Germantown, 2011 WI 31 (Wis. 2011).
Emjay Inv. Co. v. Vill. of Germantown, 2011 WI 31 (Wis. 2011). “0703 and under § 8.04 of Germantown's Municipal Code to levy special assessments against the Special Assessment District for the *258 relocation of Sanitary Sewer Lift Station No.”
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Lake of the Torches Econ. Dev. Corp., 677 F. Supp. 2d 1056 (E.D. Wis. 2010). “” Furthermore, the Trustee is entitled to the appointment of a receiver pursuant to Section 8.04. On December 18, 2009, Saybrook requested the Trustee to declare the principal and interest of all bonds due immediately based on multiple Events of Default.”
Broenen v. Beaunit Corp., 305 F. Supp. 688 (E.D. Wis. 1969). “The trust indenture in Article 8, Section 8.04, provides: “ * * * no one or more holders of Debentures shall have any right in any manner whatever by virtue of or by availing of any provision of this Indenture to affect, disturb or prejudice the rights of any other holder of…”
Smiljanic v. Niedermeyer, 2007 WI App 182 (Wis. Ct. App. 2007). “09(l)(i) may "validate" a conveyance of record even if it contains a forgery is that there is an instrument of record that on its face meets the requirements of a conveyance.”
Kmetz v. State Historical Soc'y, 304 F. Supp. 2d 1108 (W.D. Wis. 2004). “2 Moore’s Federal Practice § 8.04[5] (“Pleading evidence may violate the short and plain statement requirement of Rule 8(e)(1).”
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sokaogon Chippewa Cmty., 787 F. Supp. 2d 867 (E.D. Wis. 2011). “A, Indenture § 8.04), this is not an assignment or subcontracting of responsibilities.”
Legend Lake Prop. Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. Guy Keshena, 2026 WI 21 (Wis. 2026). “¶18 In this case, the Association argues that Congress abrogated the Tribe’s sovereign immunity by passing the Restoration Act and that the Tribe waived its immunity in a number of different ways.”
— Wis. Stat. § 8.04(4) — 1 case
Emjay Inv. Co. v. Vill. of Germantown, 2011 WI 31 (Wis. 2011). “0703 and under § 8.04 of Germantown's Municipal Code to levy special assessments against the Special Assessment District for the *258 relocation of Sanitary Sewer Lift Station No.”
— Wis. Stat. § 8.04(6) — 1 case
Emjay Inv. Co. v. Vill. of Germantown, 2011 WI 31 (Wis. 2011). “0703 and under § 8.04 of Germantown's Municipal Code to levy special assessments against the Special Assessment District for the *258 relocation of Sanitary Sewer Lift Station No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.