Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 939.6195 (2026)
Mandatory minimum sentence for repeat firearm crimes
✓ laws through the 2025-26 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
939.6195(1)(a)2.2. A commission of any crime specified under chs. 939 to 951 and 961 if the person uses a firearm in the commission of the crime.
939.6195(2)(2) If a person who is a repeater is convicted of a firearm violation, the court shall impose a bifurcated sentence under s. 973.01. Notwithstanding s. 973.01 (2) (b), the term of confinement in prison portion of the bifurcated sentence shall be at least 4 years, but otherwise the penalties for the crime apply, subject to any applicable penalty enhancement. The court may not place the person on probation.
939.6195(4)(4) The department of justice shall, after consulting with persons the department determines to be appropriate, including the city of Milwaukee and the Milwaukee police department, prepare a report on the efficacy of the mandatory minimum sentence under this section. No later than August 1, 2022, the department of justice shall submit the report to the chief clerk of each house of the legislature, for distribution to the legislature under s. 13.172 (2).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2022–2023 · leading case: State v. James Young, 991 N.W.2d 705 (Wis. Ct. App. 2023).
State v. James Young, 991 N.W.2d 705 (Wis. Ct. App. 2023). “§ 939.6195(2). The complaint, however, failed to note that the two mandatory minimum sentences were required to be served consecutive to each other— effectively resulting in a nine-year mandatory minimum.”
People v. Ashford, 2022 IL App (1st) 191923-U. “Wis. Stat. Ann. §§ 939.6195 & 939.62(1). And in New York, possession of a weapon by a person with any prior convictions 10 No.”
Wis. Stat. § 939.6195(2): 1 case
State v. James Young, 991 N.W.2d 705 (Wis. Ct. App. 2023). “§ 939.6195(2). The complaint, however, failed to note that the two mandatory minimum sentences were required to be served consecutive to each other— effectively resulting in a nine-year mandatory minimum.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.