Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 943.70 (2026)
Computer crimes
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
943.70(1)(ag)(ag) “Access” means to instruct, communicate with, interact with, intercept, store data in, retrieve data from, or otherwise use the resources of.
943.70(1)(am)(am) “Computer” means an electronic device that performs logical, arithmetic and memory functions by manipulating electronic or magnetic impulses, and includes all input, output, processing, storage, computer software and communication facilities that are connected or related to a computer in a computer system or computer network.
943.70(1)(b)(b) “Computer network” means the interconnection of communication lines with a computer through remote terminals or a complex consisting of 2 or more interconnected computers.
943.70(1)(c)(c) “Computer program” means an ordered set of instructions or statements that, when executed by a computer, causes the computer to process data.
943.70(1)(d)(d) “Computer software” means a set of computer programs, procedures or associated documentation used in the operation of a computer system.
943.70(1)(dm)(dm) “Computer supplies” means punchcards, paper tape, magnetic tape, disk packs, diskettes and computer output, including paper and microform.
943.70(1)(f)(f) “Data” means a representation of information, knowledge, facts, concepts or instructions that has been prepared or is being prepared in a formalized manner and has been processed, is being processed or is intended to be processed in a computer system or computer network. Data may be in any form including computer printouts, magnetic storage media, punched cards and as stored in the memory of the computer. Data are property.
943.70(1)(g)(g) “Financial instrument” includes any check, draft, warrant, money order, note, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, bill of exchange, credit or credit card, transaction authorization mechanism, marketable security and any computer representation of them.
943.70(1)(gm)(gm) “Interruption in service” means inability to access a computer, computer program, computer system, or computer network, or an inability to complete a transaction involving a computer.
943.70(1)(h)(h) “Property” means anything of value, including but not limited to financial instruments, information, electronically produced data, digital property, as defined in s. 711.03 (10), computer software, and computer programs.
943.70(1)(i)(i) “Supporting documentation” means all documentation used in the computer system in the construction, clarification, implementation, use or modification of the software or data.
943.70(2)(a)(a) Whoever willfully, knowingly and without authorization does any of the following may be penalized as provided in pars. (b) and (c):
943.70(2)(a)6.6. Discloses restricted access codes or other restricted access information to unauthorized persons.
943.70(2)(am)(am) Whoever intentionally causes an interruption in service by submitting a message, or multiple messages, to a computer, computer program, computer system, or computer network that exceeds the processing capacity of the computer, computer program, computer system, or computer network may be penalized as provided in pars. (b) and (c).
943.70(2)(b)3r.3r. A Class F felony if the offense causes an interruption or impairment of governmental operations or public communication, of transportation, or of a supply of water, gas, or other public service.
943.70(2)(b)4.4. A Class F felony if the offense creates a substantial and unreasonable risk of death or great bodily harm to another.
943.70(2)(c)(c) If a person disguises the identity or location of the computer at which he or she is working while committing an offense under par. (a) or (am) with the intent to make it less likely that he or she will be identified with the crime, the penalties under par. (b) may be increased as follows:
943.70(2)(c)1.1. In the case of a misdemeanor, the maximum fine prescribed by law for the crime may be increased by not more than $1,000 and the maximum term of imprisonment prescribed by law for the crime may be increased so that the revised maximum term of imprisonment is one year in the county jail.
943.70(2)(c)2.2. In the case of a felony, the maximum fine prescribed by law for the crime may be increased by not more than $2,500 and the maximum term of imprisonment prescribed by law for the crime may be increased by not more than 2 years.
943.70(3)(a)(a) Whoever willfully, knowingly and without authorization does any of the following may be penalized as provided in par. (b):
943.70(3)(a)1.1. Modifies computer equipment or supplies that are used or intended to be used in a computer, computer system or computer network.
943.70(3)(a)2.2. Destroys, uses, takes or damages a computer, computer system, computer network or equipment or supplies used or intended to be used in a computer, computer system or computer network.
943.70(3)(b)3.3. A Class H felony if the damage to the computer, computer system, computer network, equipment or supplies is greater than $2,500.
943.70(3)(b)4.4. A Class F felony if the offense creates a substantial and unreasonable risk of death or great bodily harm to another.
943.70(4)(4) Computer use restriction. In addition to the other penalties provided for violation of this section, a judge may place restrictions on the offender’s use of computers. The duration of any such restrictions may not exceed the maximum period for which the offender could have been imprisoned; except if the offense is punishable by forfeiture, the duration of the restrictions may not exceed 90 days.
943.70(5)(5) Injunctive relief. Any aggrieved party may sue for injunctive relief under ch. 813 to compel compliance with this section. In addition, owners, lessors, users or manufacturers of computers, or associations or organizations representing any of those persons, may sue for injunctive relief to prevent or stop the disclosure of information which may enable another person to gain unauthorized access to data, computer programs or supporting documentation.
943.70 NoteJudicial Council Note, 1988: [In (2) (b) 4. and (3) (b) 4.] The words “substantial risk” are substituted for “high probability” to avoid any inference that a statistical likelihood greater than 50 percent was ever intended. [Bill 191-S]
943.70 AnnotationThis section is constitutional. Copyright law does not give a programmer a copyright in data entered into the programmer’s program, and copyright law does not preempt prosecution of the programmer for destruction of data entered into the program. State v. Corcoran, 186 Wis. 2d 616, 522 N.W.2d 226 (Ct. App. 1994).
943.70 Annotation“Access codes or other restricted access information” in sub. (2) (a) 6. refers to codes, passwords, or other information that permits access to a computer system or to programs or data within a system; the phrase does not refer to the system, program, or data accessed. The statute was not meant to criminalize the disclosure of all types of information that could be stored on a computer, when that information was obtained with authorization in the first instance. Burbank Grease Services, LLC v. Sokolowski, 2006 WI 103, 294 Wis. 2d 274, 717 N.W.2d 781, 04-0468.
943.70 AnnotationCriminal liability for computer offenses and the new Wisconsin Computer Crimes Act. Levy. WBB Mar. 1983.
943.70 Annotation21st Century White Collar Crime: Intellectual Property Crimes in the Cyber World. Simon & Jones. Wis. Law. Oct. 2004.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 28
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1989–2022 · leading case: Burbank Grease Servs., LLC v. Sokolowski, 2006 WI 103 (Wis. 2006).
Burbank Grease Servs., LLC v. Sokolowski, 2006 WI 103 (Wis. 2006). “We also determine whether Wis. Stat. § 943.70 (2) criminalizes the subsequent misappropriation of confidential information when the information was lawfully obtained.”
State v. Rory A. McKellips, 2016 WI 51 (Wis. 2016). “See Wis. Stat. § 943.70 (1)(am), (e). ¶104 Note 3 to the pattern instruction states: "'Computerized communication system' is not defined in § 948.”
Burbank Grease Servs., LLC v. Sokolowski, 2005 WI App 28 (Wis. Ct. App. 2005). “90(6); and (3) Sokolowski did not take computer data from Burbank without authorization in violation of Wis. Stat. § 943.70 (2)(a)6. Accordingly, the circuit court correctly granted summary judgment against Burbank on the four claims and we affirm.”
State v. Corcoran, 522 N.W.2d 226 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). “After a preliminary examination, Corcoran filed a motion to dismiss the information, setting forth seven challenges to Wisconsin's computer crimes statute, § 943.70, Stats. He alleged that (1) the federal Copyrights Act, 17 U.”
Mgmt. Comput. Servs., Inc. v. Hawkins, Ash, Baptie & Co., 539 N.W.2d 111 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995). “§ 1961 (1) in effect as of April 27, 1982, or the attempt, conspiracy to commit, or commission of any of the felonies specified in particular chapters and sections of the Wisconsin statutes, including § 943.70, the computer-crimes statute. The wilful, knowing and unauthorized…”
Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 434 N.W.2d 773 (Wis. 1989). “(C) Did the circuit court abuse its discretion by refusing to grant a temporary injunction against the use of allegedly misappropriated computer data in violation of sec. 943.70(2), Stats., of the criminal code? We conclude that because the circuit court articulated acceptable…”
State v. House, 2007 WI 79 (Wis. 2007). “[7] See Wis. Stat. §§ 943.70 (2)(b)2.-4. [8] See Wis.”
Maxpower Corp. v. Abraham, 557 F. Supp. 2d 955 (W.D. Wis. 2008). “446 by taking property from plaintiffs without consent and with the intent of depriving plaintiffs of it permanently, took possession of electronic data belonging to plaintiffs or destroyed it, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 943.70 , violated 18 U.S.C. § 1030 and committed unfair…”
State v. Baron, 2009 WI 58 (Wis. 2009). “41 (1); two counts of computer crimes in violation of Wis. Stat. § 943.70 (2); and identity theft in violation of Wis.”
Mgmt. Comput. Servs., Inc. v. Hawkins, Ash, Baptie & Co., 557 N.W.2d 67 (Wis. 1996). “See Wis. Stat. § 943.70 (2). Fourth, although MCS did not present evidence of HABCO's net worth, the record does indicate that HABCO is a regional accounting firm with a relatively small number of offices.”
Justin J. Boucher v. Sch. Bd. of the Sch. Dist. of Greenfield, 134 F.3d 821 (7th Cir. 1998). “tant speaking at the plaintiffs request and reviewing the exhibits (including Boucher’s article), the Board concluded that the article “provided instruction to the public and unauthorized persons on how to access the school district computer programs and disclosed restricted…”
Authenticom, Inc. v. CDK Global, LLC (In re Dealer Mgmt. Sys. Antitrust Litig.), 313 F. Supp. 3d 931 (E.D. Ill. 2018). “, the Wisconsin Cyber Crimes Act ("WCCA"), Wis. Stat. § 943.70 , and other cyber-security laws.”
— Wis. Stat. § 943.70(1) — 1 case
State v. Corcoran, 522 N.W.2d 226 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). “After a preliminary examination, Corcoran filed a motion to dismiss the information, setting forth seven challenges to Wisconsin's computer crimes statute, § 943.70, Stats. He alleged that (1) the federal Copyrights Act, 17 U.”
— Wis. Stat. § 943.70(1)(am) — 1 case
State v. Rory A. McKellips, 2016 WI 51 (Wis. 2016). “See Wis. Stat. § 943.70 (1)(am), (e). ¶104 Note 3 to the pattern instruction states: "'Computerized communication system' is not defined in § 948.”
— Wis. Stat. § 943.70(1)(h) — 1 case
State v. McKinley E. Pye (Wis. Ct. App. 2022).
— Wis. Stat. § 943.70(2) — 5 cases
Burbank Grease Servs., LLC v. Sokolowski, 2006 WI 103 (Wis. 2006). “We also determine whether Wis. Stat. § 943.70 (2) criminalizes the subsequent misappropriation of confidential information when the information was lawfully obtained.”
Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 434 N.W.2d 773 (Wis. 1989). “(C) Did the circuit court abuse its discretion by refusing to grant a temporary injunction against the use of allegedly misappropriated computer data in violation of sec. 943.70(2), Stats., of the criminal code? We conclude that because the circuit court articulated acceptable…”
State v. Corcoran, 522 N.W.2d 226 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). “After a preliminary examination, Corcoran filed a motion to dismiss the information, setting forth seven challenges to Wisconsin's computer crimes statute, § 943.70, Stats. He alleged that (1) the federal Copyrights Act, 17 U.”
Justin J. Boucher v. Sch. Bd. of the Sch. Dist. of Greenfield, 134 F.3d 821 (7th Cir. 1998). “tant speaking at the plaintiffs request and reviewing the exhibits (including Boucher’s article), the Board concluded that the article “provided instruction to the public and unauthorized persons on how to access the school district computer programs and disclosed restricted…”
Burbank Grease Servs., LLC v. Sokolowski, 2005 WI App 28 (Wis. Ct. App. 2005). “90(6); and (3) Sokolowski did not take computer data from Burbank without authorization in violation of Wis. Stat. § 943.70 (2)(a)6. Accordingly, the circuit court correctly granted summary judgment against Burbank on the four claims and we affirm.”
— Wis. Stat. § 943.70(2)(a) — 4 cases
Burbank Grease Servs., LLC v. Sokolowski, 2005 WI App 28 (Wis. Ct. App. 2005). “90(6); and (3) Sokolowski did not take computer data from Burbank without authorization in violation of Wis. Stat. § 943.70 (2)(a)6. Accordingly, the circuit court correctly granted summary judgment against Burbank on the four claims and we affirm.”
State v. Corcoran, 522 N.W.2d 226 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). “After a preliminary examination, Corcoran filed a motion to dismiss the information, setting forth seven challenges to Wisconsin's computer crimes statute, § 943.70, Stats. He alleged that (1) the federal Copyrights Act, 17 U.”
Mgmt. Comput. Servs., Inc. v. Hawkins, Ash, Baptie & Co., 539 N.W.2d 111 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995). “§ 1961 (1) in effect as of April 27, 1982, or the attempt, conspiracy to commit, or commission of any of the felonies specified in particular chapters and sections of the Wisconsin statutes, including § 943.70, the computer-crimes statute. The wilful, knowing and unauthorized…”
State v. Whistleman, 2001 WI App 189 (Wis. Ct. App. 2001).
— Wis. Stat. § 943.70(2)(b) — 1 case
State v. Corcoran, 522 N.W.2d 226 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). “After a preliminary examination, Corcoran filed a motion to dismiss the information, setting forth seven challenges to Wisconsin's computer crimes statute, § 943.70, Stats. He alleged that (1) the federal Copyrights Act, 17 U.”
— Wis. Stat. § 943.70(l)(am) — 1 case
State v. Rory A. McKellips, 2016 WI 51 (Wis. 2016). “See Wis. Stat. § 943.70 (1)(am), (e). ¶104 Note 3 to the pattern instruction states: "'Computerized communication system' is not defined in § 948.”
— Wis. Stat. § 943.70(l)(c) — 1 case
State v. Corcoran, 522 N.W.2d 226 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). “After a preliminary examination, Corcoran filed a motion to dismiss the information, setting forth seven challenges to Wisconsin's computer crimes statute, § 943.70, Stats. He alleged that (1) the federal Copyrights Act, 17 U.”
— Wis. Stat. § 943.70(l)(f) — 1 case
State v. Whistleman, 2001 WI App 189 (Wis. Ct. App. 2001).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.