Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 950.10 (2026)

Limitation on liability; grounds for appeal

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
950.10950.10Limitation on liability; grounds for appeal.
950.10(1)(1)No cause of action for money damages may arise against the state, any political subdivision of the state or any employee or agent of the state or a political subdivision of the state for any act or omission in the performance of any power or duty under this chapter or under article I, section 9m, of the Wisconsin constitution or for any act or omission in the performance of any power or duty under ch. 938 relating to the rights of, services for or notices to victims.
950.10(2)(2)A failure to provide a right, service or notice to a victim under this chapter or ch. 938 or under article I, section 9m, of the Wisconsin constitution is not a ground for an appeal of a judgment of conviction or sentence and is not grounds for any court to reverse or modify a judgment of conviction or sentence.
950.10 HistoryHistory: 1997 a. 181.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2002–2024 · leading case: The Honorable William M. Gabler, Sr. v. Crime Victims Rights Bd., 2017 WI 67 (Wis. 2017).
The Honorable William M. Gabler, Sr. v. Crime Victims Rights Bd., 2017 WI 67 (Wis. 2017). · cites it 9× “2d 507 (State conceded that failure to conform to statutory provisions governing crime victim rights is not grounds for an appeal of a sentence, citing Wis. Stat. § 950.10 (2)). 44 No. 2016AP275.”
State v. Grindemann, 2002 WI App 106 (Wis. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 3× “See Wis. Stat. § 950.10 (2). We also note that the appealed order may be subject to réversal because it arguably imposes an illegal sentence.”
The Honorable William M. Gabler, Sr. v. Crime Victims Rights Bd. (Wis. 2017). · cites it 4× “2d 507 (State conceded that failure to conform to statutory provisions governing crime victim rights is not grounds for an appeal of a sentence, citing Wis. Stat. § 950.10 (2)). 44 No. 2016AP275.”
Mayotte v. Her (E.D. Wis. 2019). · cites it 2× “See Wis. Stat. § 950.10 (2017-18). Simply put, Plaintiff does not state a claim under federal or state law.”
Nash v. Bacich (E.D. Wis. 2024). · cites it 2× “And both Wisconsin’s “Rights of Victims and Witnesses of Crime,” Wis.”
Nash v. Bacich (E.D. Wis. 2024). · cites it 2× “I § 9m; see also Wis. Stat. § 950.10 (1) (same). Because she cannot actually recover any of the relief she seeks for Bacich’s alleged violations of Marsy’s Law, the Court will order that that claim be dismissed without prejudice.”
Nash v. Bacich (E.D. Wis. 2024). · cites it 2× “I § 9m, and Wis. Stat. § 950.10 (1)). The Court accordingly dismissed that claim without prejudice.”
— Wis. Stat. § 950.10(2) — 3 cases
The Honorable William M. Gabler, Sr. v. Crime Victims Rights Bd., 2017 WI 67 (Wis. 2017). “2d 507 (State conceded that failure to conform to statutory provisions governing crime victim rights is not grounds for an appeal of a sentence, citing Wis. Stat. § 950.10 (2)). 44 No. 2016AP275.”
State v. Grindemann, 2002 WI App 106 (Wis. Ct. App. 2002). “See Wis. Stat. § 950.10 (2). We also note that the appealed order may be subject to réversal because it arguably imposes an illegal sentence.”
The Honorable William M. Gabler, Sr. v. Crime Victims Rights Bd. (Wis. 2017). “2d 507 (State conceded that failure to conform to statutory provisions governing crime victim rights is not grounds for an appeal of a sentence, citing Wis. Stat. § 950.10 (2)). 44 No. 2016AP275.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.