Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 950.105 (2026)

Standing

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
950.105950.105Standing. A crime victim has a right to assert, in a court in the county in which the alleged violation occurred, his or her rights as a crime victim under the statutes or under article I, section 9m, of the Wisconsin Constitution. This section does not preclude a district attorney from asserting a victim’s statutory or constitutional crime victim’s rights in a criminal case or in a proceeding or motion brought under this section.
950.105 HistoryHistory: 2011 a. 283.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2017–2023 · leading case: The Honorable William M. Gabler, Sr. v. Crime Victims Rights Bd., 2017 WI 67 (Wis. 2017).
The Honorable William M. Gabler, Sr. v. Crime Victims Rights Bd., 2017 WI 67 (Wis. 2017). · cites it 14× “23 23 Availability of standing for victims under Wis. Stat. § 950.105 also undermines the Board's argument that referral to the judicial commission under Wis.”
State v. Alan S. Johnson, 2023 WI 39 (Wis. 2023). · cites it 2× “What the 2 The parties also briefed the question of whether Wis. Stat. § 950.105 , which provides in relevant part that, "[a] crime victim has a right to assert, in a court in the county in which the alleged violation occurred, his or her rights as a crime victim under the…”
The Honorable William M. Gabler, Sr. v. Crime Victims Rights Bd. (Wis. 2017). · cites it 7× “23 23 Availability of standing for victims under Wis. Stat. § 950.105 also undermines the Board's argument that referral to the judicial commission under Wis.”
Zaruba Galindo Colby v. Sokup (E.D. Wis. 2020). · cites it 2× “See Wis. Stat. §950.105 (“[a] crime victim has a right to assert, in a court in the county in which the alleged violation occurred, his or her rights as a crime victim under the statutes or under article I, section 9m, of the Wisconsin Constitution”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.