Wis. Stat. » CHAPTER 951 — CRIMES AGAINST ANIMALS
Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 951.08 (2026)

Instigating fights between animals

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
951.08951.08 Instigating fights between animals.
951.08(1)(1) No person may intentionally instigate, promote, aid or abet as a principal, agent or employee, or participate in the earnings from, or intentionally maintain or allow any place to be used for a cockfight, dog fight, bullfight or other fight between the same or different kinds of animals or between an animal and a person. This section does not prohibit events or exhibitions commonly featured at rodeos or bloodless bullfights.
951.08(2)(2) No person may own, possess, keep or train any animal with the intent that the animal be engaged in an exhibition of fighting.
951.08(2m)(2m) If a person has been convicted under sub. (1) or (2), the person may not own, possess, keep or train any animal for a period of 5 years after the conviction. In computing the 5-year period, time which the person spent in actual confinement serving a criminal sentence shall be excluded. The person may move the sentencing court to have this requirement waived. The court may waive the requirement except that the waiver may not authorize the person to own, possess, keep or train animals of the species involved in the offense under sub. (1) or (2).
951.08(3)(3) No person may intentionally be a spectator at a cockfight, dog fight, bullfight or other fight between the same or different kinds of animals or between an animal and a person.
951.08 HistoryHistory: 1973 c. 314; 1981 c. 160; 1983 a. 95; 1987 a. 332 s. 54; Stats. 1987 s. 951.08.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2011–2011 · leading case: State v. Kuenzi, 2011 WI App 30 (Wis. Ct. App. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Kuenzi, 2011 WI App 30 (Wis. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “See Wis. Stat. §§ 951.08 and 951.097. The prohibition at issue here is cruel mistreatment under Wis.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.