Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 969.13 (2026)
Forfeiture
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
969.13(1)(1) If the conditions of the bond are not complied with, the court having jurisdiction over the defendant in the criminal action shall enter an order declaring the bail to be forfeited.
969.13(2)(2) This order may be set aside upon such conditions as the court imposes if it appears that justice does not require the enforcement of the forfeiture.
969.13(3)(3) By entering into a bond, the defendant and sureties submit to the jurisdiction of the court for the purposes of liability on the bond and irrevocably appoint the clerk as their agent upon whom any papers affecting their bond liability may be served. Their liability may be enforced without the necessity of an independent action.
969.13(4)(4) Notice of the order of forfeiture under sub. (1) shall be mailed forthwith by the clerk to the defendant and the defendant’s sureties at their last addresses. If the defendant does not appear and surrender to the court within 30 days from the date of the forfeiture and within such period the defendant or the defendant’s sureties do not satisfy the court that appearance and surrender by the defendant at the time scheduled for the defendant’s appearance was impossible and without the defendant’s fault, the court shall upon motion of the district attorney enter judgment for the state against the defendant and any surety for the amount of the bail and costs of the court proceeding. Proceeds of the judgment shall be paid to the county treasurer. The motion and such notice of motion as the court prescribes may be served on the clerk who shall forthwith mail copies to the defendant and the defendant’s sureties at their last addresses.
969.13(5)(a)(a) A cash deposit made with the clerk pursuant to this chapter shall be applied first to the payment of any recompense determined under par. (b) and then, if the recompense is paid in full, to the payment of costs. If any amount of such deposit remains after the payment of costs, it shall be applied to payment of the judgment of forfeiture. The person making the cash deposit shall be given written notice of the requirements of this paragraph.
969.13(5)(b)(b) The court shall determine a recompense amount for any victim, or if the victim is deceased, for his or her estate, of the crime for which the bond was entered into unless the court finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record. The court shall determine the recompense amount in the same manner as the court would have determined the restitution amount under s. 973.20 (2), (3), (4), (4m), (5), and (7) had the person been convicted.
969.13 AnnotationForfeiture proceedings are a part of an underlying criminal case. State v. Givens, 88 Wis. 2d 457, 276 N.W.2d 790 (1979).
969.13 AnnotationThe trial court abused its discretion in refusing to modify an order under sub. (2) when partial remission of a bond was appropriate. State v. Ascencio, 92 Wis. 2d 822, 285 N.W.2d 910 (Ct. App. 1979).
969.13 AnnotationForfeiture proceedings are civil in nature; appeals are governed by s. 808.04. State v. Wickstrom, 134 Wis. 2d 158, 396 N.W.2d 188 (1986).
969.13 AnnotationSub. (1) mandates bail forfeiture for any bond condition violation. State v. Badzmierowski, 171 Wis. 2d 260, 490 N.W.2d 784 (Ct. App. 1992).
969.13 AnnotationA circuit court has discretion to enter a judgment on an order forfeiting bail absent a motion by the district attorney when the defendant appears within 30 days of the forfeiture. State v. Achterberg, 201 Wis. 2d 291, 548 N.W.2d 515 (1996), 94-3360.
969.13 AnnotationThe trial court’s decision under sub. (2) requires the exercise of discretion. Refusing all requests for the return of bail money is not an exercise of discretion. The standard “that justice requires” cannot be parlayed into an all-inclusive list, but it is essentially an appeal to the conscience of the court. Melone v. State, 2001 WI App 13, 240 Wis. 2d 451, 623 N.W.2d 179, 00-0969.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1979–2025 · leading case: State v. Braun, 301 N.W.2d 180 (Wis. 1981).
State v. Braun, 301 N.W.2d 180 (Wis. 1981). “09 (1) and sec. 969.13, Stats. Enforcement of the terms of the bail bond agreement is therefore equivalent to enforcement of sec.”
State v. Achterberg, 548 N.W.2d 515 (Wis. 1996). “Pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 969.13 (1), 3 the judge ordered his bail forfeited.”
State v. Ascencio, 285 N.W.2d 910 (Wis. Ct. App. 1979). “Section 969.13 (2), Stats., permits the court to set aside the forfeiture order upon such conditions as the court imposes “if it appears that justice does not require the enforcement of the forfeiture.”
State v. Anderson, 580 N.W.2d 329 (Wis. 1998). “See Wis. Stat. §§ 969.13 , 969.08(2), and 940.”
State v. Beiersdorf, 561 N.W.2d 749 (Wis. Ct. App. 1997). “" We note that defense attorneys, in countless cases, do ask trial courts to convert personal recognizance bonds to cash bail when their clients have been arrested and do remain in custody on cash bail on subsequent charges. They do so precisely because they want to assure…”
Melone v. State, 2001 WI App 13 (Wis. Ct. App. 2000). “§ 969.13(2) (1997-98), 1 requires the court to exercise discretion and consider factors for and against enforcing the forfeiture on a case-by-case basis.”
State v. Badzmierowski, 490 N.W.2d 784 (Wis. Ct. App. 1992). “Grace, appeals from the trial court's judgment of bail forfeiture based on sec. 969.13(1), Stats. 1 The issue is whether forfeiture can be ordered under the statute when Grace attended every *262 court appearance but violated other conditions of his bond.”
State v. Wickstrom, 396 N.W.2d 188 (Wis. 1986). “, which states: “A crime is conduct which is prohibited by state law and punishable by fine or imprisonment or both.”
State v. Kenneth J. Heinrich (Wis. Ct. App. 2020). “2016CM247 was signed on July 19, 2016, and among other things, it prohibited Heinrich from committing any new crimes. See WIS. STAT. § 969.02(4) (“As a condition of release in all cases, a person released under this section shall not commit any crime.”
State v. Givens, 276 N.W.2d 790 (Wis. 1979). “We conclude that the provisions of sec. 969.13, Stats., 1 are broad enough to vest authority to set aside a forfeiture order in both the court ordering forfeiture or the one having jurisdiction over the defendant at a given stage *462 of the proceedings.”
State v. Braun, 285 N.W.2d 886 (Wis. Ct. App. 1979). “When he failed to do so, the express conditions of his bail bond agreement were broken by him, and the payment of the bond was due forthwith to Milwaukee county and subject to forfeiture pursuant to sec. 969.13, Stats. Appellant does not contend that the express terms and…”
State v. Dylan R. Hildebrandt (Wis. Ct. App. 2025). “§ 969.13(1) (“If the conditions of [a defendant’s] bond are not complied with, [a circuit] court .”
— Wis. Stat. § 969.13(1) — 9 cases
State v. Braun, 301 N.W.2d 180 (Wis. 1981). “09 (1) and sec. 969.13, Stats. Enforcement of the terms of the bail bond agreement is therefore equivalent to enforcement of sec.”
State v. Badzmierowski, 490 N.W.2d 784 (Wis. Ct. App. 1992). “Grace, appeals from the trial court's judgment of bail forfeiture based on sec. 969.13(1), Stats. 1 The issue is whether forfeiture can be ordered under the statute when Grace attended every *262 court appearance but violated other conditions of his bond.”
State v. Beiersdorf, 561 N.W.2d 749 (Wis. Ct. App. 1997). “" We note that defense attorneys, in countless cases, do ask trial courts to convert personal recognizance bonds to cash bail when their clients have been arrested and do remain in custody on cash bail on subsequent charges. They do so precisely because they want to assure…”
State v. Ascencio, 285 N.W.2d 910 (Wis. Ct. App. 1979). “Section 969.13 (2), Stats., permits the court to set aside the forfeiture order upon such conditions as the court imposes “if it appears that justice does not require the enforcement of the forfeiture.”
State v. Achterberg, 548 N.W.2d 515 (Wis. 1996). “Pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 969.13 (1), 3 the judge ordered his bail forfeited.”
— Wis. Stat. § 969.13(2) — 6 cases
State v. Braun, 301 N.W.2d 180 (Wis. 1981). “09 (1) and sec. 969.13, Stats. Enforcement of the terms of the bail bond agreement is therefore equivalent to enforcement of sec.”
State v. Ascencio, 285 N.W.2d 910 (Wis. Ct. App. 1979). “Section 969.13 (2), Stats., permits the court to set aside the forfeiture order upon such conditions as the court imposes “if it appears that justice does not require the enforcement of the forfeiture.”
Melone v. State, 2001 WI App 13 (Wis. Ct. App. 2000). “§ 969.13(2) (1997-98), 1 requires the court to exercise discretion and consider factors for and against enforcing the forfeiture on a case-by-case basis.”
State v. Givens, 276 N.W.2d 790 (Wis. 1979). “We conclude that the provisions of sec. 969.13, Stats., 1 are broad enough to vest authority to set aside a forfeiture order in both the court ordering forfeiture or the one having jurisdiction over the defendant at a given stage *462 of the proceedings.”
State v. Kenneth J. Heinrich (Wis. Ct. App. 2020). “2016CM247 was signed on July 19, 2016, and among other things, it prohibited Heinrich from committing any new crimes. See WIS. STAT. § 969.02(4) (“As a condition of release in all cases, a person released under this section shall not commit any crime.”
— Wis. Stat. § 969.13(4) — 3 cases
State v. Achterberg, 548 N.W.2d 515 (Wis. 1996). “Pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 969.13 (1), 3 the judge ordered his bail forfeited.”
State v. Ascencio, 285 N.W.2d 910 (Wis. Ct. App. 1979). “Section 969.13 (2), Stats., permits the court to set aside the forfeiture order upon such conditions as the court imposes “if it appears that justice does not require the enforcement of the forfeiture.”
State v. Wickstrom, 396 N.W.2d 188 (Wis. 1986). “, which states: “A crime is conduct which is prohibited by state law and punishable by fine or imprisonment or both.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.