Wyoming Statutes
Wyo. Stat. § 1-1-114 (2026)
Pleading of damages.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
In all cases the court shall inform the jury of the consequences of its verdict.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1980–2014 · leading case: Coryell v. Town of Pinedale, 745 P.2d 883 (Wyo. 1987).
Coryell v. Town of Pinedale, 745 P.2d 883 (Wyo. 1987). “The trial court correctly instructed the jury as to the effect of its verdict as required by W.S. § 1-1-114 (1977). "II. The trial court correctly instructed the jury that a municipal police officer could lawfully pursue a suspect outside his corporate limits pursuant to W.”
White v. Fisher, 689 P.2d 102 (Wyo. 1984). “Does W.S. 1-1-114 prohibit the mention of a dollar amount of damage in the body of the Complaint; and “B.”
Buttrey Food Stores Div. v. Coulson, 620 P.2d 549 (Wyo. 1980). “It appears that the plaintiff made every effort to make her complaint comply with § 1-1-114, W.S. 1977. That statute provides: "The ad damnum clause or prayer for damages incorporated in a pleading which sets forth a claim for relief based upon personal injury or wrongful death…”
Billis v. State, 800 P.2d 401 (Wyo. 1990). “1984), in which the parties had not raised the constitutionality of W.S. 1-1-114 (1977), relating to the legislatively imposed requirement that the prayer for damages in a personal injury or wrongful death action shall not state any dollar amount or demand a sum as judgment,…”
Harmon v. Town of Afton, 745 P.2d 889 (Wyo. 1987). “Appellants' argument overlooks § 1-1-114, W.S. 1977, which provides in pertinent part: "In all cases the court shall inform the jury of the consequences of its verdict.”
Burton v. Fisher Controls Co., 713 P.2d 1137 (Wyo. 1986). “Section 1-1-114, W.S.1977, provides in part: “ * * * In all cases the court shall inform the jury of the consequences of its verdict.”
Powers v. State, 318 P.3d 300 (Wyo. 2014). “[[Image here]] It is our conclusion that § 1-1-114, W.S. 1977, is unconstitutional in the present form.”
Kerry & Clara Powers, on behalf of themselves & the citizens of Wyoming & Cindy Hill, on behalf of herself & as the Superintendent of Pub. Instruction v. State of Wyoming & Matthew H. Mead, Governor, in his Off. capacity, 2014 WY 15 (Wyo. 2014). “It is our conclusion that § 1-1-114, W.S.1977, is unconstitutional in the present form.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.