Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 1-1-114 (2026)

Pleading of damages.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
In all cases the court shall inform the jury of the consequences
of its verdict.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1980–2014 · leading case: Coryell v. Town of Pinedale, 745 P.2d 883 (Wyo. 1987).
Coryell v. Town of Pinedale, 745 P.2d 883 (Wyo. 1987). · cites it 18× “The trial court correctly instructed the jury as to the effect of its verdict as required by W.S. § 1-1-114 (1977). "II. The trial court correctly instructed the jury that a municipal police officer could lawfully pursue a suspect outside his corporate limits pursuant to W.”
White v. Fisher, 689 P.2d 102 (Wyo. 1984). · cites it 11× “Does W.S. 1-1-114 prohibit the mention of a dollar amount of damage in the body of the Complaint; and “B.”
Buttrey Food Stores Div. v. Coulson, 620 P.2d 549 (Wyo. 1980). · cites it 4× “It appears that the plaintiff made every effort to make her complaint comply with § 1-1-114, W.S. 1977. That statute provides: "The ad damnum clause or prayer for damages incorporated in a pleading which sets forth a claim for relief based upon personal injury or wrongful death…”
Billis v. State, 800 P.2d 401 (Wyo. 1990). · cites it 2× “1984), in which the parties had not raised the constitutionality of W.S. 1-1-114 (1977), relating to the legislatively imposed requirement that the prayer for damages in a personal injury or wrongful death action shall not state any dollar amount or demand a sum as judgment,…”
Harmon v. Town of Afton, 745 P.2d 889 (Wyo. 1987). · cites it 4× “Appellants' argument overlooks § 1-1-114, W.S. 1977, which provides in pertinent part: "In all cases the court shall inform the jury of the consequences of its verdict.”
Burton v. Fisher Controls Co., 713 P.2d 1137 (Wyo. 1986). · cites it 3× “Section 1-1-114, W.S.1977, provides in part: “ * * * In all cases the court shall inform the jury of the consequences of its verdict.”
Powers v. State, 318 P.3d 300 (Wyo. 2014). “[[Image here]] It is our conclusion that § 1-1-114, W.S. 1977, is unconstitutional in the present form.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.