Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 1-17-701 (2026)

Short title.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
This act means W.S. 1-17-701 through 1-17-707 and may be cited
as the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1981–2015 · leading case: Sandstrom v. Sandstrom, 880 P.2d 103 (Wyo. 1994).
Sandstrom v. Sandstrom, 880 P.2d 103 (Wyo. 1994). · cites it 2× “Wyo.Stat. §§ 1-17-701 to -707 (1988). See generally Salmeri v.”
Coones v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., 848 P.2d 783 (Wyo. 1993). · cites it 2× “See Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act, Wyo.Stat. § 1-17-701 to § 1-17-707 (1988).”
Hill v. Value Recovery Grp., L.P., 964 P.2d 1256 (Wyo. 1998). · cites it 3× “Wyo. Stat. §§ 1-17-701 to -707 (1997); Hull v.”
Cook v. Swires, 2009 WY 21 (Wyo. 2009). · cites it 2× “Claus filed both Colorado judgments in Albany County pursuant to the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act, Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 1-17-701 through 1-17-707 (LexisNexis 2007) (UEF-JA).”
Mobil Cerro Negro Ltd. v. Bolivarian Repub. of Venezuela, 87 F. Supp. 3d 573 (S.D.N.Y. 2015). · cites it 2× “See Uniform Law Commission, The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, Legislative Fact Sheet — En forcement of Foreign Judgments Act (noting that all states but California, Vermont, and Connecticut have enacted a version of the UEFJA), available at…”
Rodgers v. Rodgers, 627 P.2d 1381 (Wyo. 1981). “The requirement of in personam jurisdiction is not in conflict with the situation in which a party invokes the jurisdiction of the court by instituting action against a party served in this state pursuant to the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act, § 1-17-701, W.S.1977…”
Routh v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Comp. Div., 952 P.2d 1108 (Wyo. 1998). · cites it 2× “Wyo. Stat. § 1-17-701 to -707 (1988). The Division appeared in the Wyoming district court, and, after failing to secure relief by a motion to dismiss, presented a motion for summary judgment.”
Hull v. Buffalo Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 661 P.2d 1049 (Wyo. 1983). “” On appeal, appellants contend that the district court erred in holding that the “Certificate of Judgment” did not comply with the requirement of the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act, § 1-17-701 et seq., W.S.1977, i.e. that it was not a properly authenticated copy…”
Routh v. State Ex Rel. Workers'comp. Div., 952 P.2d 1108 (Wyo. 1998). “§ 1-17-701 to -707 (1988). The Division appeared in the Wyoming district court, and, after failing to secure relief by a motion to dismiss, presented a motion for summary judgment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.