Wyo. Stat. » Wyo. Stat. / Title 18 - Counties / Chapter 3 - COUNTY OFFICERS / Article 5 - COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 18-3-510 (2026)

Claims against county to be itemized and

✓ text as retrieved May 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar 
verified; penalty.

     (a) No claim against the county shall be allowed by the
board of county commissioners unless it is properly dated and
itemized and the value of each item specifically described, and
when no specified fees are allowed by law, the date that such
services were rendered and the time actually and necessarily
devoted to the performance of any service. Each claim shall be
accompanied by an affidavit, stating that the claim is just and
correct and that no part of the claim has been paid by the
county or other person. The board of county commissioners may
disallow any account, in whole or in part, when so rendered and
verified, and may require further evidence of the truth and
propriety of the claim. This section does not apply to claims
under the Wyoming Governmental Claims Act.

     (b) The board of county commissioners shall be held
responsible on their official bonds to the full amount of any
claim allowed, to be recovered in an action of debt for the use
of the county, should the evidence show that any part of any
claim has been allowed by any board of county commissioners
contrary to the provisions of this section.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1979–1979 · leading case: Nimmo v. State, 603 P.2d 386 (Wyo. 1979).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nimmo v. State, 603 P.2d 386 (Wyo. 1979). · cites it 2× “For examples, see § 18-3-510(a), W.S. 1977, requiring an affidavit for a claim against a county; § 27-12-201, W.”
Wyo. Stat. § 18-3-510(a): 1 case
Nimmo v. State, 603 P.2d 386 (Wyo. 1979). “For examples, see § 18-3-510(a), W.S. 1977, requiring an affidavit for a claim against a county; § 27-12-201, W.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.