Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 27-14-204 (2026)

Coverage of out-of-state injuries; filing.

✓ text as retrieved May 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(a)   Repealed By Laws 1997, ch. 177, § 2.

     (b) The payment or award of benefits under the worker's
compensation law of another state to an employee or his
dependents otherwise entitled on account of the injury or death
to the benefits of this act is not a bar to a claim for benefits
under this act if a claim under this act is filed within the
time limits set forth in W.S. 27-14-503. If compensation is paid
or awarded under this act, the total amounts of medical and
related income and death benefits paid or awarded under another
worker's compensation law shall be credited against the total
corresponding medical and related income and death benefits due
under this act.

    (c)   Repealed by Laws 1989, ch. 29, §§ 1, 2.

     (d) Any employee injured outside of the state of Wyoming
and coming under the provisions of this section shall file his
application for compensation with the division.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1988–1997 · leading case: Worker's Comp. Claim of Gneiting v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Comp. Div., 897 P.2d 1306 (Wyo. 1995).
Worker's Comp. Claim of Gneiting v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Comp. Div., 897 P.2d 1306 (Wyo. 1995). · cites it 11× “Whether the Division met its burden of proving that it determined Gneiting was “permanently assigned” outside the state within the meaning of Wyo.Stat. § 27-14-204(a) (1977 & 1993 Cum.”
Wessel v. Mapco, Inc., 752 P.2d 1363 (Wyo. 1988). · cites it 4× “" Section 27-14-204(c), W.S. 1977, 1987 Replacement, is identical to the repealed section.”
Wheeler v. Parker Drilling Co., 803 P.2d 1379 (Wyo. 1991). · cites it 2× “The Wheelers claim that support for their reasoning is found in Wyo.Stat. § 27-14-204 (1977), amended by 1989 Wyo.”
B-F Drilling, Inc. v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Saf. & Comp. Div., 942 P.2d 392 (Wyo. 1997). · cites it 6× “1995); and (2) whether the Division was estopped from denying benefits by accepting B-F Drilling’s premiums in November 1994 and January 1995 which included House as an employee. 2 A. Permanent Assignment Outside of Wyoming The parties agree that the Division carries the burden…”
Chapman v. Meyers, 899 P.2d 48 (Wyo. 1995). · cites it 2× “We also note Chapman suffered his injuries in Colorado, but the Division determined that under Wyo.Stat. § 27-14-204(a) (Supp. 1994), that fact was not an impediment to the claim.”
BF Drilling v. State, 942 P.2d 392 (Wyo. 1997). · cites it 6× “1995); and (2) whether the Division was estopped from denying benefits by accepting B-F Drilling's premiums in November 1994 and January 1995 which included House as an employee. [2] A. PERMANENT ASSIGNMENT OUTSIDE OF WYOMING The parties agree that the Division carries the…”
Wyo. Stat. § 27-14-204(a): 4 cases
Worker's Comp. Claim of Gneiting v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Comp. Div., 897 P.2d 1306 (Wyo. 1995). “Whether the Division met its burden of proving that it determined Gneiting was “permanently assigned” outside the state within the meaning of Wyo.Stat. § 27-14-204(a) (1977 & 1993 Cum.”
Chapman v. Meyers, 899 P.2d 48 (Wyo. 1995). “We also note Chapman suffered his injuries in Colorado, but the Division determined that under Wyo.Stat. § 27-14-204(a) (Supp. 1994), that fact was not an impediment to the claim.”
B-F Drilling, Inc. v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Saf. & Comp. Div., 942 P.2d 392 (Wyo. 1997). “1995); and (2) whether the Division was estopped from denying benefits by accepting B-F Drilling’s premiums in November 1994 and January 1995 which included House as an employee. 2 A. Permanent Assignment Outside of Wyoming The parties agree that the Division carries the burden…”
BF Drilling v. State, 942 P.2d 392 (Wyo. 1997). “1995); and (2) whether the Division was estopped from denying benefits by accepting B-F Drilling's premiums in November 1994 and January 1995 which included House as an employee. [2] A. PERMANENT ASSIGNMENT OUTSIDE OF WYOMING The parties agree that the Division carries the…”
Wyo. Stat. § 27-14-204(b): 2 cases
B-F Drilling, Inc. v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Saf. & Comp. Div., 942 P.2d 392 (Wyo. 1997). “1995); and (2) whether the Division was estopped from denying benefits by accepting B-F Drilling’s premiums in November 1994 and January 1995 which included House as an employee. 2 A. Permanent Assignment Outside of Wyoming The parties agree that the Division carries the burden…”
BF Drilling v. State, 942 P.2d 392 (Wyo. 1997). “1995); and (2) whether the Division was estopped from denying benefits by accepting B-F Drilling's premiums in November 1994 and January 1995 which included House as an employee. [2] A. PERMANENT ASSIGNMENT OUTSIDE OF WYOMING The parties agree that the Division carries the…”
Wyo. Stat. § 27-14-204(c): 1 case
Wessel v. Mapco, Inc., 752 P.2d 1363 (Wyo. 1988). “" Section 27-14-204(c), W.S. 1977, 1987 Replacement, is identical to the repealed section.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.