Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 31-7-133 (2026)

Unlawful use of license.

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) It is an unlawful use of a license and is a
misdemeanor for any person to:

          (i) Display or permit to be displayed, or have in his
possession any cancelled, revoked, suspended, fictitious or
fraudulently altered driver's license;

          (ii) Lend his driver's license to any other person or
knowingly permit its use by another;

          (iii) Display or represent as one's own any driver's
license not issued to him;

         (iv)   Repealed by Laws 2025, ch. 9, § 2.

          (v) Use a false or fictitious name in any application
for a driver's license, knowingly make a false statement,
knowingly conceal a material fact or otherwise commit a fraud in
any application;

          (vi) Permit any unlawful use     of a driver's license
issued to him; or
          (vii) Drive a vehicle in violation of the
endorsements on his driver's license, commercial driver's
license or commercial learners, instruction or temporary permit.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1979–1984 · leading case: Yeik v. Dep't of Revenue & Taxation, 595 P.2d 965 (Wyo. 1979).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Yeik v. Dep't of Revenue & Taxation, 595 P.2d 965 (Wyo. 1979). · cites it 5× “He appealed that decision to the district court pursuant to § 31-7-133, W.S.1977. 1 In the district court a motion was made by appellee, the Department of Revenue and Taxation (department), to dismiss the appellant’s petition for review, because he had failed to exhaust his…”

Dep't of Revenue & Taxation v. Irvine, 589 P.2d 1295 (Wyo. 1979). · cites it 4× “(now § 31-7-133, W.S. 1977) and Rule 72.1, W.R.”

State, Dep't of Revenue & Taxation v. Guadagnoli, 677 P.2d 823 (Wyo. 1984). · cites it 8× “By authority of the provisions of § 31-7-133, W.S.1977, 2 the appellee Guadagnoli filed with the district court a petition for review of the independent hearing examiner’s order of suspension.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.