Wyoming Statutes
Wyo. Stat. § 33-38-113 (2026)
Privileged communication.
✓ text as retrieved May 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) In judicial proceedings, whether civil, criminal, or juvenile, in administrative proceedings, and in proceedings preliminary and ancillary thereto, a patient or client, or his guardian or personal representative, may refuse to disclose and may prevent the disclosure of confidential information, including information contained in administrative records, communicated to a person licensed or otherwise authorized to practice under this act or in accordance with the Interstate Compact for Licensed Professional Counselors under W.S. 33-38- 202, and their agents, for the purpose of diagnosis, evaluation or treatment of any mental or emotional condition or disorder. A person licensed or otherwise authorized to practice under this act or in accordance with the Interstate Compact for Licensed Professional Counselors under W.S. 33-38-202 shall not disclose any information communicated as described above in the absence of an express waiver of the privilege except in the following circumstances: (i) Where abuse or harmful neglect of children, the elderly or disabled or incompetent individuals is known or reasonably suspected; (ii) Where the validity of a will of a former patient or client is contested; (iii) Where such information is necessary to defend against a malpractice action brought by the patient or client; (iv) Where an immediate threat of physical violence against a readily identifiable victim is disclosed to the person licensed or otherwise authorized to practice under this act or in accordance with the Interstate Compact for Licensed Professional Counselors under W.S. 33-38-202; (v) In the context of civil commitment proceedings, where an immediate threat of self-inflicted damage is disclosed to the person licensed or otherwise authorized to practice under this act or in accordance with the Interstate Compact for Licensed Professional Counselors under W.S. 33-38-202; (vi) Where the patient or client alleges mental or emotional damages in civil litigation or otherwise places his mental or emotional state in issue in any judicial or administrative proceeding concerning child custody or visitation; (vii) Where the patient or client is examined pursuant to court order; or (viii) In the context of investigations and hearings brought by the patient or client and conducted by the board where violations of this act or the Interstate Compact for Licensed Professional Counselors under W.S. 33-38-202 are at issue. Information that is deemed to be of sensitive nature shall be inspected by the board in camera and the board shall determine whether or not the information shall become a part of the record and subject to public disclosure.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2002–2024 · leading case: In the Matter of the Termination of Parental Rights To: GAC, a Minor Child. Krystal Kaylynn Cave v. State of Wyoming, Dep't of Fam. Servs., 2017 WY 65, 396 P.3d 411.
In the Matter of the Termination of Parental Rights To: GAC, a Minor Child. Krystal Kaylynn Cave v. State of Wyoming, Dep't of Fam. Servs., 2017 WY 65, 396 P.3d 411. “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 33-38-113 (LexisNexis 2015) establishes a privilege for information communicated by a patient or client to professional counselors, marriage and family therapists, social workers, and chemical dependency specialists “for the purpose of diagnosis, evaluation or…”
Wade Loyning v. Neisha Potter, 2024 WY 82, 553 P.3d 128. “” [¶4] Therapist filed a motion to quash the subpoena in the district court in Park County on the ground Father was requesting counseling records that were privileged and confidential pursuant to both Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 33-38-113 and the Health Insurance Portability and…”
Cooper v. State, 2002 WY 78, 46 P.3d 884. “Cooper did not expressly waive his privilege as required by Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 33-38-113 (LexisNexis 2001), he impliedly did so and did not suffer any prejudice.”
Killian v. Caza Drilling, Inc., 2006 WY 42, 131 P.3d 975. “Did the trial court abuse its discretion in ordering that information regarding Orvil Long's alcohol counseling, which was court-ordered in an unrelated case, was confidential pursuant to Wyoming Statute Annotated § 33-38-113? FACTS [¶3] On April 15, 2001, Clint Hammers…”
Eaton v. State, 2008 WY 97, 192 P.3d 36. “First, Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 33-38-113 (LexisNexis 2007) is not applicable.”
Aubri Vahai v. Ryan Gertsch, 2020 WY 7, 455 P.3d 1218. “Vahai does not rely on it, § 33-38-113 establishes a similar “privilege for information communicated by a patient or client to professional counselors, marriage and family therapists, social workers, and chemical dependency specialists for the purpose of diagnosis, evaluation or…”
In re Greene, 2009 WY 42, 204 P.3d 285. “§ 33-27-123 and § 33-38-113 (LexisNexis 2005) and did not fall within any exception.”
Bb v. RSR, 2007 WY 4, 149 P.3d 727. “Both parties submitted briefs regarding the scope of the privilege, pursuant to Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 33-38-113 (LexisNexis 2005), in custody modification proceedings.”
United States v. Mellette, No. 21-0312/NA (C.A.A.F. July 27, 2022). “, Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 33-38-113 (a) (1999) (preventing the disclosure of “confidential information, including information contained in administrative records”); 740 Ill.”
United States v. Mellette, No. 21-0312/NA (C.A.A.F. July 27, 2022). “, Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 33-38-113 (a) (1999) (preventing the disclosure of “confidential information, including information contained in administrative records”); 740 Ill.”
Wyo. Stat. § 33-38-113(a): 2 cases
In the Matter of the Termination of Parental Rights To: GAC, a Minor Child. Krystal Kaylynn Cave v. State of Wyoming, Dep't of Fam. Servs., 2017 WY 65, 396 P.3d 411. “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 33-38-113 (LexisNexis 2015) establishes a privilege for information communicated by a patient or client to professional counselors, marriage and family therapists, social workers, and chemical dependency specialists “for the purpose of diagnosis, evaluation or…”
Wade Loyning v. Neisha Potter, 2024 WY 82, 553 P.3d 128. “” [¶4] Therapist filed a motion to quash the subpoena in the district court in Park County on the ground Father was requesting counseling records that were privileged and confidential pursuant to both Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 33-38-113 and the Health Insurance Portability and…”
Wyo. Stat. § 33-38-113(a)(i): 1 case
In the Matter of the Termination of Parental Rights To: GAC, a Minor Child. Krystal Kaylynn Cave v. State of Wyoming, Dep't of Fam. Servs., 2017 WY 65, 396 P.3d 411. “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 33-38-113 (LexisNexis 2015) establishes a privilege for information communicated by a patient or client to professional counselors, marriage and family therapists, social workers, and chemical dependency specialists “for the purpose of diagnosis, evaluation or…”
Wyo. Stat. § 33-38-113(a)(iii): 1 case
In re Greene, 2009 WY 42, 204 P.3d 285. “§ 33-27-123 and § 33-38-113 (LexisNexis 2005) and did not fall within any exception.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.