Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 40-12-101 (2026)

Short title.

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This act may be cited as the "Wyoming Consumer Protection Act."

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1978–2025 · leading case: In re Pharm. Indus. Average Wholesale Price Litig., 252 F.R.D. 83 (D. Mass. 2008).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In re Pharm. Indus. Average Wholesale Price Litig., 252 F.R.D. 83 (D. Mass. 2008). · cites it 3× “), and Wyoming ( Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 40-12-101 , et seq.). I will not certify the Non-Medicare Class under these statutes.”

Herrig v. Herrig, 844 P.2d 487 (Wyo. 1992). · cites it 2× “Whether Appellants may assert a private cause of action against Farmers Insurance for an alleged violation of the Wyoming Consumer Protection Act, Wyo.Stat. §§ 40-12-101 to -112 (1977 & Supp.”

In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust Litig., 516 F. Supp. 2d 1072 (N.D. Cal. 2007). “See Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 40-12-101 et seq. Defendants argue that the CPA does not extend to price-fixing.”

Kure v. Chevrolet Motor Div., 581 P.2d 603 (Wyo. 1978). “1977, of the Wyoming Consumer Protection Act, in those parts relied on by plaintiff is as follows: “(a) A person engages in a deceptive trade practice unlawful under this act [§§ 40-12-101 to 40-12-112] when, in the course of his business and in connection with a consumer…”

Dellos Farms, Inc., a Wyoming Corp. Brian K. Dellos, Individually & as Pers. Rep. for the Est. of Edith L. Dellos, Dellos Homestead, Llc, a Wyoming Ltd. Liab. Co. v. Sec. State Bank, 2022 WY 107 (Wyo. 2022). · cites it 2× “The Dellos defendants responded by filing counterclaims alleging SSB had engaged in improper lending practices under the Wyoming Consumer Protection Act (WCPA), Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 40-12-101 through 114 (LexisNexis 2021).”

Osborn v. Emporium Videos, 870 P.2d 382 (Wyo. 1994). · cites it 2× “Wyo.Stat. §§ 40-12-101 to -209 (1993). However, Osborn failed to suggest in his pleadings that those statutes were applicable to this case.”

Humana Inc. v. Merck & Co., Inc. (D.N.J. 2025). “The Wyoming Consumer Protection Act, see Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 40-12-101 et seq., “is targeted at ‘unscrupulous and fraudulent marketing practices’ that are distinguishable from allegations of antitrust violations, and moreover, the Wyoming legislature has seen fit to provide a…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.