Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 7-11-304 (2026)

Responsibility for criminal conduct; plea;

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
examination; commitment; use of statements by defendant.

     (a) A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at
the time of the criminal conduct, as a result of mental illness
or deficiency, he lacked substantial capacity either to
appreciate the wrongfulness of his conduct or to conform his
conduct to the requirements of law. As used in this section, the
terms mental illness or deficiency mean only those severely
abnormal mental conditions that grossly and demonstrably impair
a person's perception or understanding of reality and that are
not attributable primarily to self-induced intoxication as
defined by W.S. 6-1-202(b).

     (b) As used in this section, the terms "mental illness or
deficiency" do not include an abnormality manifested only by
repeated criminal or otherwise antisocial conduct.

     (c) Evidence that a person is not responsible for criminal
conduct by reason of mental illness or deficiency is not
admissible at the trial of the defendant unless a plea of "not
guilty by reason of mental illness or deficiency" is made. A
plea of "not guilty by reason of mental illness or deficiency"
may be pleaded orally or in writing by the defendant or his
counsel at the time of his arraignment. The court, for good
cause shown, may also allow that plea to be entered at a later
time. Such a plea does not deprive the defendant of other
defenses.

     (d) In all cases where a plea of "not guilty by reason of
mental illness or deficiency" is made, the court shall order an
examination of the defendant by a designated examiner. The
order may include, but is not limited to, an examination of the
defendant at the Wyoming state hospital on an inpatient or
outpatient basis, at a local mental health center on an
inpatient or outpatient basis, or at his place of detention. In
selecting the examination site, the court may consider proximity
to the court, availability of an examiner and the necessity for
security precautions. If the order provides for commitment of
the defendant to a designated facility, the commitment shall
continue no longer than a forty-five (45) day period for the
observation and evaluation of the mental condition of the
defendant, which time may be extended by the approval of the
court.

     (e) If an examination of a defendant's fitness to proceed
has been ordered pursuant to W.S. 7-11-303, an examination
following a plea of "not guilty by reason of mental illness or
deficiency" shall not occur, or be ordered, until the court has
found the defendant is competent to proceed under W.S. 7-11-303.

     (f) A written report of the examination shall be filed
with the clerk of court. The report shall include:

          (i) Detailed findings, including, but not limited to,
the data and reasoning that link the opinions specified in
paragraphs (ii) and (iii) of this subsection;

          (ii) An opinion as to whether the defendant has a
mental illness or deficiency;

          (iii) An opinion as to whether at the time of the
alleged criminal conduct the defendant, as a result of mental
illness or deficiency, lacked substantial capacity to appreciate
the wrongfulness of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the
requirements of law.

     (g) The clerk of court shall deliver copies of the report
to the district attorney and to the defendant or his counsel.
The report shall not be a public record or open to the public.
If an examination provided under subsection (d) of this section
was conducted, the report may be received in evidence and no new
examination shall be required unless requested under this
subsection. Within five (5) days after receiving a copy of the
report, the defendant or the state, upon written request, may
obtain an order granting an examination of the defendant by a
designated examiner chosen by the requester of the examination.

     (h) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, no
statement made by the defendant in the course of any examination
or treatment pursuant to this section and no information
received by any person in the course thereof is admissible in
evidence in any criminal proceeding on any issue other than that
of the mental condition of the defendant. If the defendant
testifies in his own behalf, any statement made by him in the
course of any examination or treatment pursuant to this section
may be admitted:

           (i)    For impeachment purposes; or

           (ii)    As evidence in a criminal prosecution for
perjury.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 47 cases (13 in the last 5 years), 1979–2026 · leading case: Fulcher v. State, 633 P.2d 142 (Wyo. 1981).
Fulcher v. State, 633 P.2d 142 (Wyo. 1981). · cites it 25× “" Upon being advised by the trial judge that he would have to be committed for examination pursuant to § 7-11-304, W.S. 1977, he withdrew that plea and entered a plea of not guilty.”
Miller v. State, 755 P.2d 855 (Wyo. 1988). · cites it 14× “Section 7-11-304(a), W.S. 1977 (Cum.Supp.”
Van Dean v. State, 668 P.2d 639 (Wyo. 1983). · cites it 12× “The first sentence of subsection (a) and all of subsection (b) of § 7-11-304, W.S. 1977, (see fn. 2) are § 4.”
Jett Garriott Adams v. The State of Wyoming, 2023 WY 85 (Wyo. 2023). · cites it 14× “Adams then entered a new plea of not guilty by reason of mental illness or deficiency (NGMI), requiring an evaluation pursuant to Wyo. Stat. § 7-11-304. Dr. Renee Wilkinson conducted the NGMI evaluation.”
Hayes v. State, 599 P.2d 558 (Wyo. 1979). · cites it 8× “y exists at the time of the trial to the extent that the accused is unfit to proceed with it (§ 7-11-303); (2) the situation in which the mental illness or deficiency of the accused exists at the time of the crime to the extent that it excludes responsibility of the accused for…”
Gabbert v. State, 420 P.3d 172 (Wyo. 2018). · cites it 13× “Yufik found that Appellant did not have a mental illness or deficiency as defined by § 7-11-304 and that he did not lack the substantial capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of his conduct or conform his conduct to the requirements of the law.”
Jamie Stuart Snyder v. The State of Wyoming, 2021 WY 108 (Wyo. 2021). · cites it 6× “Snyder undergo an NGMI evaluation pursuant to Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-11-304 . Dr. Mahaffey, on behalf of WSH, evaluated Mr.”
Jahnke v. State, 682 P.2d 991 (Wyo. 1984). · cites it 4× “The State's Response to The Defendant's Offer of Proof In response to the offer of proof (which included the transfer proceeding), the State *1029 argued that the psychiatric testimony should not be received for these following reasons: (a) There had been no plea of mental…”
McLaren v. State, 407 P.3d 1200 (Wyo. 2017). · cites it 6× “” Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-11-304 . Through counsel, Mr.”
Gilber Aldolfo Delgado, Jr. v. The State of Wyoming, 2022 WY 61 (Wyo. 2022). · cites it 5× “§ 7-11-304 (a) (LexisNexis 2021) sets the standard for a NGMI defense: (a) A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of the criminal conduct, as a result of mental illness or deficiency, he lacked substantial capacity either to appreciate the wrongfulness…”
Nicholas J. Jendresen v. The State of Wyoming, 2021 WY 82 (Wyo. 2021). · cites it 3× “Jendresen filed a Motion to Enter Plea of Not Guilty by Reason of Mental Illness (NGMI) and a Motion for a Psychological Evaluation, Criminal Responsibility pursuant to Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-11-304 . Mr. Jendresen’s counsel later explained that the NGMI defense was not part of his…”
— Wyo. Stat. § 7-11-304(a) — 12 cases
Miller v. State, 755 P.2d 855 (Wyo. 1988). “Section 7-11-304(a), W.S. 1977 (Cum.Supp.”
Fulcher v. State, 633 P.2d 142 (Wyo. 1981). “" Upon being advised by the trial judge that he would have to be committed for examination pursuant to § 7-11-304, W.S. 1977, he withdrew that plea and entered a plea of not guilty.”
Jahnke v. State, 682 P.2d 991 (Wyo. 1984). “The State's Response to The Defendant's Offer of Proof In response to the offer of proof (which included the transfer proceeding), the State *1029 argued that the psychiatric testimony should not be received for these following reasons: (a) There had been no plea of mental…”
Gilber Aldolfo Delgado, Jr. v. The State of Wyoming, 2022 WY 61 (Wyo. 2022). “§ 7-11-304 (a) (LexisNexis 2021) sets the standard for a NGMI defense: (a) A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of the criminal conduct, as a result of mental illness or deficiency, he lacked substantial capacity either to appreciate the wrongfulness…”
Lewis v. State, 709 P.2d 1278 (Wyo. 1985).
— Wyo. Stat. § 7-11-304(b) — 2 cases
Van Dean v. State, 668 P.2d 639 (Wyo. 1983). “The first sentence of subsection (a) and all of subsection (b) of § 7-11-304, W.S. 1977, (see fn. 2) are § 4.”
Fulcher v. State, 633 P.2d 142 (Wyo. 1981). “" Upon being advised by the trial judge that he would have to be committed for examination pursuant to § 7-11-304, W.S. 1977, he withdrew that plea and entered a plea of not guilty.”
— Wyo. Stat. § 7-11-304(c) — 3 cases
Fulcher v. State, 633 P.2d 142 (Wyo. 1981). “" Upon being advised by the trial judge that he would have to be committed for examination pursuant to § 7-11-304, W.S. 1977, he withdrew that plea and entered a plea of not guilty.”
Krucheck v. State, 671 P.2d 1222 (Wyo. 1983).
Potter v. State, 2007 WY 83 (Wyo. 2007).
— Wyo. Stat. § 7-11-304(d) — 4 cases
Pote v. State, 695 P.2d 617 (Wyo. 1985).
Engle v. State, 774 P.2d 1303 (Wyo. 1989).
Frank J. Mchenry v. The State of Wyoming, 2023 WY 68 (Wyo. 2023).
Large v. State, 2011 WY 159 (Wyo. 2011).
— Wyo. Stat. § 7-11-304(g) — 1 case
— Wyo. Stat. § 7-11-304(h) — 2 cases
Jett Garriott Adams v. The State of Wyoming, 2023 WY 85 (Wyo. 2023). “Adams then entered a new plea of not guilty by reason of mental illness or deficiency (NGMI), requiring an evaluation pursuant to Wyo. Stat. § 7-11-304. Dr. Renee Wilkinson conducted the NGMI evaluation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.