Wyoming Statutes
Wyo. Stat. § 7-13-904 (2026)
Method of execution.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) When sentence of death is imposed by the court in any
criminal case, the punishment of death shall be executed by the
administration of a continuous intravenous injection of a lethal
quantity of an ultra-short-acting barbiturate, alone or in
combination with a chemical paralytic agent and potassium
chloride, or other equally effective substance or substances
sufficient to cause death, until death is pronounced by a
licensed physician according to accepted standards of medical
practice. The sentence of death shall be executed within the
time prescribed by law, unless, for cause shown, the court or
governor extends the time. Administration of the injection does
not constitute the practice of medicine.
(b) If the execution of the sentence of death as provided
in subsection (a) of this section is held unconstitutional, the
sentence of death shall be executed by the administration of
lethal gas within the time prescribed by law unless for cause
shown, the court or the governor extends the time.Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases, 1983–2008 · leading case: Baze v. Rees, 553 U.S. 35 (2008).
Baze v. Rees, 553 U.S. 35 (2008). “2007); Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-13-904 (2007). Nine States allow for lethal injection in addition to an alternative method, such as electrocution, see Ala.”
Olsen v. State, 67 P.3d 536 (Wyo. 2003). “§ 7-13-904 (Michie 1997) mandates that the punishment of death be administered by a continuous intravenous injection of a lethal quantity of chemicals.”
Hopkinson v. State, 798 P.2d 1186 (Wyo. 1990). “The assertion of Petitioner that execution by lethal injection, as provided for in Section 7-13-904(a), W.S. 1977, constitutes cruel and unusual punishment is rejected as contrary to pertinent authority.”
Evans v. State, 914 A.2d 25 (Md. 2006). “Codified Laws § 23A-27A-32; Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-13-904 (a). We are informed, without contradiction by Evans, that in at least 24 of the States using lethal injection, the same three drugs called for in the EOM were prescribed, although not all of those States have statutes that…”
State v. Webb, 750 A.2d 448 (Conn. 2000). “§ 77-18-5.5 (Lexis Law Publishing 1999); Virginia, Va.”
State v. Deputy, 644 A.2d 411 (Del. Super. Ct. 1994). “180 (1993)); and Wyoming (Wyo.Stat. § 7-13-904 (1993)). Virginia has enacted legislation, 1994 Va.”
Gray v. Lucas, Warden, Et Al., 463 U.S. 1237 (1983). “720 (1978)); and Wyoming (Wyo. Stat. § 7-13-904 (1977)). A similar situation was presented in Enmund v.”
Beardslee v. Woodford, 395 F.3d 1064 (9th Cir. 2005). “Codified Laws § 23A-27A-32; Tennessee, Tenn.”
Cooper v. Rimmer, 379 F.3d 1029 (9th Cir. 2004). “180; and Wyoming, Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-13-904 .”
Cooper v. Rimmer, 358 F.3d 655 (9th Cir. 2004). “180; and Wyoming, Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-13-904 .”
Beardslee v. Woodford (9th Cir. 2005). “180 ; and Wyoming, Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-13-904 . Since Cooper was decided, the death penalty statutes in New York and Kansas have been held unconstitutional for reasons other than the method of exe- cution.”
— Wyo. Stat. § 7-13-904(a) — 2 cases
Hopkinson v. State, 798 P.2d 1186 (Wyo. 1990). “The assertion of Petitioner that execution by lethal injection, as provided for in Section 7-13-904(a), W.S. 1977, constitutes cruel and unusual punishment is rejected as contrary to pertinent authority.”
Olsen v. State, 67 P.3d 536 (Wyo. 2003). “§ 7-13-904 (Michie 1997) mandates that the punishment of death be administered by a continuous intravenous injection of a lethal quantity of chemicals.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.