Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 7-18-107 (2026)

Required guidelines in contracts; review by

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

local government.

     (a) Every contract for services entered into pursuant to
this act between a corrections board and a local unit of
government or a nongovernmental agency shall provide guidelines
for the operation of the adult community correctional facility
or program and minimum standards for the services provided,
including:

          (i) Requirements for strict accountability procedures
and practices for the conduct and supervision of offenders,
parolees and inmates including requirements for twenty-four (24)
hour supervision of offenders, parolees and inmates in
residential programs;

          (ii) Guidelines for service providers to perform
periodic and unscheduled tests to determine the use of drugs by
offenders, parolees and inmates; and

          (iii) Guidelines for service providers to develop
individual treatment plans for each offender, parolee or inmate.

     (b) Prior to entering into agreement or contract with any
nongovernmental adult community corrections agency, the
corrections board shall submit the agreement or contract and any
proposed guidelines for the use of any program or facility to
the department and the governing body of any affected unit of
local government for its review and recommendations.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2000–2024 · leading case: Jones v. State, 2006 WY 40 (Wyo. 2006).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Jones v. State, 2006 WY 40 (Wyo. 2006). · cites it 4× “" Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-18-107 (LexisNexis 2001)(amended 2003).”

ENDRIS v. State, 2010 WY 73 (Wyo. 2010). · cites it 2× “Endris escaped from official detention when the underlying sentence under W.S. § 7-18-107 was an illegal sentence, and therefore null and void? 2.”

Hagerman v. State, 2011 WY 151 (Wyo. 2011). · cites it 2× “§ 7-18-107 (LexisNexis 2011), and the appellant was ordered to spend one year in the Fremont County Detention Center, to be followed by four years of supervised probation. [15] Two specific terms of this sentence are relevant to the discussion herein.”

Paugh v. State, 9 P.3d 973 (Wyo. 2000). · cites it 2× “The district court imposed a split sentence under Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-18-107 (Lexis 1999), pursuant to which Paugh was to serve ninety days in the Campbell County Detention Center and then be subject to supervised probation for sixty months.”

Castillo v. State, 268 P.3d 245 (Wyo. 2012). · cites it 2× “The prison sentence was suspended pursuant to the split sentencing provision of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-18-107 (LexisNexis 2011), and the appellant was ordered to serve 180 days in the county jail, to be followed by four years of supervised probation.”

Daugherty v. State, 44 P.3d 58 (Wyo. 2002). · cites it 8× “[120] In reversing Wlodarezyk's sentence, this Court identified two types of split sentences that could be imposed under Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-18-107 :(1) split sentencing involving incarceration in the county jail for a period not to exceed one year with a probationary sentence…”

William R. Durkin, Iii v. The State of Wyoming, 2024 WY 101 (Wyo. 2024). · cites it 2× “See Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-18-107 (establishing requirements for contracts between ACCs and community corrections boards); Wyo.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.