(a) In an action for relief against a transfer under this chapter, the remedies available to creditors, subject to the limitations in Section 8-9A-8, include:
(1) Avoidance of the transfer to the extent necessary to satisfy the creditor’s claim;
(2) An attachment or other provisional remedy against the asset transferred or other property of the transferee in accordance with the procedure prescribed by any applicable provision of any other statute or the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure;
(3) Subject to applicable principles of equity and in accordance with applicable rules of civil procedure,
a. An injunction against further disposition by the debtor or a transferee, or both, of the asset transferred or of other property;
b. Appointment of a receiver to take charge of the asset transferred or of other property of the transferee; or
c. Any other relief the circumstances may require.
(b) If a creditor has obtained a judgment on a claim against the debtor, the creditor, if the court so orders, may levy execution on the asset transferred or its proceeds.
(Acts 1989, No. 89-793, p. 1585, §7.)
Notes of Decisions
Johns v. AT Stephens Enter., Inc., 815 So. 2d 511 (Ala. 2001).
· cites it 4× “Citing Ala.Code 1975, § 8-9A-7(a)(1), the defendants first argue that the normal remedy for a fraudulent conveyance is not damages, but rather a rescission or avoidance of the conveyance.”
Gen. Med., P.C. v. Horizon/CMS Health Care Corp., 475 F. App'x 65 (6th Cir. 2012).
· cites it 2× “Ala.Code § 8-9A-7(a)(l) (authorizing creditor remedy of “[a] void anee of the transfer to the extent necessary to satisfy the creditor’s claim” (emphasis added)).”
In Re: PWS Holding Corp, 303 F.3d 308 (3rd Cir. 2002).
· cites it 2× “” Ala.Code 1975, § 8-9A-7. Both the Reorganization Plan and the Confirmation Order specifically identify “all avoidance claims” asserted in the “Haskell Alabama Action,” such as those available under the AUFTA, as “extinguished.”
Roberson v. Johnson, 950 So. 2d 317 (Ala. Civ. App. 2006).
“" § 8-9A-7, Ala.Code 1975. The AUFTA also provides several defenses to a transferee.”
State Dep't of Revenue v. Wyatt Oil Co., 886 So. 2d 817 (Ala. Civ. App. 2003).
“Section 8-9A-7(a)(3)a. of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act provides that in an action for relief against a fraudulent transfer, subject to the applicable principles of equity and in accordance with the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure, one of the remedies available is “[a]n…”
SE Prop. Holdings, LLC v. Judkins (S.D. Ala. 2019).
· cites it 6× “CODE § 8-9A-7. Additionally, section 8-9A-8(b) of the AUFTA provides “to the extent a transfer is voidable in an action by a creditor under Section 8-9A-7(a)(1), the creditor may recover .”
Int'l Mgmt. Grp., Inc. v. Bryant Bank, 274 So. 3d 1003 (Ala. Civ. App. 2018).
· cites it 2× “See Ala. Code 1975, 8-9A-7(b) (providing that, "[i]f a creditor has obtained a judgment on a claim against the debtor, the creditor, if the court so orders, may levy execution on the asset transferred or its proceeds").”
SE Prop. Holdings, LLC v. Ctr. (S.D. Ala. 2020).
· cites it 4× “An Amended Final Judgment will be entered that (i) avoids the subject fraudulent transfers pursuant to Alabama Code § 8-9A-7(a)(1); (ii) enters money judgments against each of the transferee defendants in the specified amounts pursuant to Alabama Code § 8-9A-8(b); and (iii)…”
Int'l Mgmt. Grp., Inc. v. Bryant Bank, 274 So. 3d 1003 (Ala. Civ. App. 2018).
· cites it 2× “See Ala. Code 1975, 8-9A-7(b) (providing that, "[i]f a creditor has obtained a judgment on a claim against the debtor, the creditor, if the court so orders, may levy execution on the asset transferred or its proceeds").”
Robert Laslie Jones, III (Bankr. M.D. Ala. 2020).
· cites it 2× “Specifically, § 8-9A-7 of the AUFTA provides avoidance of the transfer as a remedy available to a creditor upon a finding of actual fraud.”
We Got Games, LLC v. E & D Ventures, LLC, 261 So. 3d 1224 (Ala. Civ. App. 2018).
“See § 8-9A-7, Ala. Code 1975 (providing the remedies available to creditors for a claim asserted under the Alabama Fraudulent Transfer Act); Hanner v.”
We Got Games, LLC v. E & D Ventures, LLC, 261 So. 3d 1224 (Ala. Civ. App. 2018).
“See § 8-9A-7, Ala. Code 1975 (providing the remedies available to creditors for a claim asserted under the Alabama Fraudulent Transfer Act); Hanner v.”
— Ala. Code § 8-9A-7(a) — 1 case
— Ala. Code § 8-9A-7(a)(1) — 3 cases
Johns v. AT Stephens Enter., Inc., 815 So. 2d 511 (Ala. 2001).
“Citing Ala.Code 1975, § 8-9A-7(a)(1), the defendants first argue that the normal remedy for a fraudulent conveyance is not damages, but rather a rescission or avoidance of the conveyance.”
SE Prop. Holdings, LLC v. Ctr. (S.D. Ala. 2020).
“An Amended Final Judgment will be entered that (i) avoids the subject fraudulent transfers pursuant to Alabama Code § 8-9A-7(a)(1); (ii) enters money judgments against each of the transferee defendants in the specified amounts pursuant to Alabama Code § 8-9A-8(b); and (iii)…”
SE Prop. Holdings, LLC v. Judkins (S.D. Ala. 2019).
“CODE § 8-9A-7. Additionally, section 8-9A-8(b) of the AUFTA provides “to the extent a transfer is voidable in an action by a creditor under Section 8-9A-7(a)(1), the creditor may recover .”
— Ala. Code § 8-9A-7(a)(3) — 3 cases
Johns v. AT Stephens Enter., Inc., 815 So. 2d 511 (Ala. 2001).
“Citing Ala.Code 1975, § 8-9A-7(a)(1), the defendants first argue that the normal remedy for a fraudulent conveyance is not damages, but rather a rescission or avoidance of the conveyance.”
State Dep't of Revenue v. Wyatt Oil Co., 886 So. 2d 817 (Ala. Civ. App. 2003).
“Section 8-9A-7(a)(3)a. of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act provides that in an action for relief against a fraudulent transfer, subject to the applicable principles of equity and in accordance with the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure, one of the remedies available is “[a]n…”
— Ala. Code § 8-9A-7(a)(3)(c) — 1 case
SE Prop. Holdings, LLC v. Judkins (S.D. Ala. 2019).
“CODE § 8-9A-7. Additionally, section 8-9A-8(b) of the AUFTA provides “to the extent a transfer is voidable in an action by a creditor under Section 8-9A-7(a)(1), the creditor may recover .”
— Ala. Code § 8-9A-7(a)(l) — 1 case
Gen. Med., P.C. v. Horizon/CMS Health Care Corp., 475 F. App'x 65 (6th Cir. 2012).
“Ala.Code § 8-9A-7(a)(l) (authorizing creditor remedy of “[a] void anee of the transfer to the extent necessary to satisfy the creditor’s claim” (emphasis added)).”
— Ala. Code § 8-9A-7(b) — 3 cases
Gen. Med., P.C. v. Horizon/CMS Health Care Corp., 475 F. App'x 65 (6th Cir. 2012).
“Ala.Code § 8-9A-7(a)(l) (authorizing creditor remedy of “[a] void anee of the transfer to the extent necessary to satisfy the creditor’s claim” (emphasis added)).”
Int'l Mgmt. Grp., Inc. v. Bryant Bank, 274 So. 3d 1003 (Ala. Civ. App. 2018).
“See Ala. Code 1975, 8-9A-7(b) (providing that, "[i]f a creditor has obtained a judgment on a claim against the debtor, the creditor, if the court so orders, may levy execution on the asset transferred or its proceeds").”
Int'l Mgmt. Grp., Inc. v. Bryant Bank, 274 So. 3d 1003 (Ala. Civ. App. 2018).
“See Ala. Code 1975, 8-9A-7(b) (providing that, "[i]f a creditor has obtained a judgment on a claim against the debtor, the creditor, if the court so orders, may levy execution on the asset transferred or its proceeds").”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.