Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 09.43.300 (2026)
Application
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 09.43.300. Application.
(a) AS 09.43.300 — 09.43.595 govern an agreement to arbitrate made on or after January 1, 2005.
(b) AS 09.43.300 — 09.43.595 govern an agreement to arbitrate made before January 1, 2005, if all the parties to the agreement or to the arbitration proceeding agree in a record that AS 09.43.300 — 09.43.595 govern the agreement.
(c) Except as provided by (d) of this section, AS 09.43.300 — 09.43.595 do not apply to a labor-management contract unless they are incorporated into the contract or their application is provided for by contract.
(d) AS 09.43.300 — 09.43.595 do not apply to a collective bargaining agreement subject to AS 23.40.070 — 23.40.260, except as provided by AS 23.40.070 — 23.40.260.
(e) A person may not waive the effective date of a provision of AS 09.43.300 — 09.43.595, and a waiver of the effective date of a provision of AS 09.43.300 — 09.43.595 is void.
(a) AS 09.43.300 — 09.43.595 govern an agreement to arbitrate made on or after January 1, 2005.
(b) AS 09.43.300 — 09.43.595 govern an agreement to arbitrate made before January 1, 2005, if all the parties to the agreement or to the arbitration proceeding agree in a record that AS 09.43.300 — 09.43.595 govern the agreement.
(c) Except as provided by (d) of this section, AS 09.43.300 — 09.43.595 do not apply to a labor-management contract unless they are incorporated into the contract or their application is provided for by contract.
(d) AS 09.43.300 — 09.43.595 do not apply to a collective bargaining agreement subject to AS 23.40.070 — 23.40.260, except as provided by AS 23.40.070 — 23.40.260.
(e) A person may not waive the effective date of a provision of AS 09.43.300 — 09.43.595, and a waiver of the effective date of a provision of AS 09.43.300 — 09.43.595 is void.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2009–2009 · leading case: Optimer Intern, Inc. v. Rp Bellevue, LLC, 214 P.3d 954 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009).
Optimer Intern, Inc. v. Rp Bellevue, LLC, 214 P.3d 954 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “In addition to Washington, the following jurisdictions have adopted the Uniform Arbitration Act (2000): Alaska, Alaska Stat. §§ 09.43.300 -.595; Colorado, Colo.”
Optimer Int'l, Inc. v. RP Bellevue, LLC, 151 Wash. App. 954 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “In addition to Washington, the following jurisdictions have adopted the Uniform Arbitration Act (2000): Alaska, Alaska Stat. §§ 09.43.300 -.595; Colorado, Colo.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.