Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 11.76.110 (2026)
Interference with constitutional rights
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 11.76.110. Interference with constitutional rights.
(a) A person commits the crime of interference with constitutional rights if
(1) the person injures, oppresses, threatens, or intimidates another person with intent to deprive that person of a right, privilege, or immunity in fact granted by the constitution or laws of this state;
(2) the person intentionally injures, oppresses, threatens, or intimidates another person because that person has exercised or enjoyed a right, privilege, or immunity in fact granted by the constitution or laws of this state; or
(3) under color of law, ordinance, or regulation of this state or a municipality or other political subdivision of this state, the person intentionally deprives another of a right, privilege, or immunity in fact granted by the constitution or laws of this state.
(b) In a prosecution under this section, whether the injury, oppression, threat, intimidation, or deprivation concerns a right, privilege, or immunity granted by the constitution or laws of this state is a question of law.
(c) Interference with constitutional rights is a class A misdemeanor.
(a) A person commits the crime of interference with constitutional rights if
(1) the person injures, oppresses, threatens, or intimidates another person with intent to deprive that person of a right, privilege, or immunity in fact granted by the constitution or laws of this state;
(2) the person intentionally injures, oppresses, threatens, or intimidates another person because that person has exercised or enjoyed a right, privilege, or immunity in fact granted by the constitution or laws of this state; or
(3) under color of law, ordinance, or regulation of this state or a municipality or other political subdivision of this state, the person intentionally deprives another of a right, privilege, or immunity in fact granted by the constitution or laws of this state.
(b) In a prosecution under this section, whether the injury, oppression, threat, intimidation, or deprivation concerns a right, privilege, or immunity granted by the constitution or laws of this state is a question of law.
(c) Interference with constitutional rights is a class A misdemeanor.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1980–2024 · leading case: Richard Barton DeRemer III v. Craig Turnbull & Brian Morris, 453 P.3d 193 (Alaska 2019).
Richard Barton DeRemer III v. Craig Turnbull & Brian Morris, 453 P.3d 193 (Alaska 2019). “2 See AS 11.76.110. -3- 7419 B. Proceedings In May 2015 DeRemer, self-represented, filed a civil complaint in superior court.”
Belluomini v. Fred Meyer of Alaska, Inc., 993 P.2d 1009 (Alaska 1999). “He relies on AS 11.76.110, which declares interference with constitutional rights to be a “class A misdemeanor,” and on AS 11.”
Wickwire v. State, 725 P.2d 695 (Alaska 1986). “He also alleged the State unfairly conducted the investigation that led to his termination, in violation of his contract rights, article I, section 7 of the Alaska Constitution and AS 11.76.110. These claims are not at issue in this appeal.”
State v. Sundberg, 611 P.2d 44 (Alaska 1980). “This offense is now incorporated under AS 11.76.110 of the new criminal code which provides in pertinent part: Interference with Constitutional Rights.”
Patrick H. Torrence v. Tyler Blue, 552 P.3d 489 (Alaska 2024). “15 In DeRemer we affirmed the dismissal of a self-represented prisoner’s tort claim that was based on AS 11.76.110, which makes it a class A misdemeanor to interfere with another’s constitutional rights.”
Cim Joel Blair v. State of Alaska, Dep't of Corr. (Alaska 2020). “The sixth and last category alleged violations of his right to access the courts, based on both the constitution and criminal statute AS 11.76.110,2 and of his due process right to present a defense in his criminal case without interference.”
Patrick H. Torrence v. State of Alaska Dep't of Corr. (Alaska 2024). “Torrence also claimed that various staff interfered with his constitutional rights in violation of AS 11.76.110,6 or committed official 5 The named DOC defendants were: The Commissioner of the Department of Corrections, Nancy Dahlstrom, the Superintendent of Spring Creek…”
Lady Donna Dutchess v. Jason Dutch (Alaska 2022). “26 The mother argues that the superior court “erred in continuing to allow the intentional interference” with constitutional rights, in violation of AS 11.76.110 and 18 U.S.C. § 242 , but this argument fails.”
Keith-Joseph v. Saxby (D. Alaska 2022). “14 In Claim 1, Plaintiff alleges all Defendants violated his First Amendment right to access the courts by using an unconstitutional “special order” to “deny[ him] access to the courts.”
Walter Kurka v. State of Alaska (Alaska 2012). “18 AS 11.76.110(a)(3) provides “[a] person commits the crime of interference with constitutional rights if .”
— Alaska Stat. § 11.76.110(a)(3) — 1 case
Walter Kurka v. State of Alaska (Alaska 2012). “18 AS 11.76.110(a)(3) provides “[a] person commits the crime of interference with constitutional rights if .”
— Alaska Stat. § 11.76.110(c) — 1 case
Richard Barton DeRemer III v. Craig Turnbull & Brian Morris, 453 P.3d 193 (Alaska 2019). “2 See AS 11.76.110. -3- 7419 B. Proceedings In May 2015 DeRemer, self-represented, filed a civil complaint in superior court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.