Alaska Stat. » Chapter 15.20
Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 15.20.210 (2026)

Procedure for district canvass. [Repealed, § 231 ch 100 SLA 1980. For current law, see

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 15.20.210. Procedure for district canvass. [Repealed, § 231 ch 100 SLA 1980. For current law, see AS 15.20.203.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1978–1979 · leading case: Hammond v. Hickel, 588 P.2d 256 (Alaska 1978).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hammond v. Hickel, 588 P.2d 256 (Alaska 1978). · cites it 2× “AS 15.20.210. Challenged votes are segregated and the inner envelope is not removed, mingled with other votes, nor counted.”
Willis v. Thomas, 600 P.2d 1079 (Alaska 1979). · cites it 2× “The statute provides in pertinent part: No ballot shall be counted if the voter has failed to properly execute the certificate, if the witnesses or the officer or other person authorized by law to administer the oath fails to affix his signature, or if the voter fails to enclose…”
Alaska Stat. § 15.20.210(a): 1 case
Willis v. Thomas, 600 P.2d 1079 (Alaska 1979). “The statute provides in pertinent part: No ballot shall be counted if the voter has failed to properly execute the certificate, if the witnesses or the officer or other person authorized by law to administer the oath fails to affix his signature, or if the voter fails to enclose…”
Alaska Stat. § 15.20.210(b): 1 case
Hammond v. Hickel, 588 P.2d 256 (Alaska 1978). “AS 15.20.210. Challenged votes are segregated and the inner envelope is not removed, mingled with other votes, nor counted.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.