Alaska Stat. » Chapter 15.25
Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 15.25.110 (2026)

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
§§ 15.25.110 — 15.25.130. Filling vacancies by party petition; requirements for party petition; selection of nominees for party petition.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1992–2025 · leading case: O'callaghan v. State, 826 P.2d 1132 (Alaska 1992).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
O'callaghan v. State, 826 P.2d 1132 (Alaska 1992). · cites it 20× “Mike O’Callaghan appeals the superior court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Director of Elections and Jack Coghill, arguing that Coghill was a “disqualified” candidate under AS 15.25.110 and that the Director of Elections unlawfully placed his name on the 1990…”
O'callaghan v. State, 914 P.2d 1250 (Alaska 1996). · cites it 4× “056, AS 15.25.110. [7] That the Alaska Statutes do not entrust candidate selection to political parties is consistent with the scant attention given political parties in the Alaska Constitution.”
O'callaghan v. State, 920 P.2d 1387 (Alaska 1996). · cites it 3× “O’Callaghan then petitioned the court for a hearing on the proper interpretation of AS 15.25.110, which governs the practice of filling vacancies by party petition.”
State v. Alaska Democratic Party, 426 P.3d 901 (Alaska 2018). “5 See AS 15.25.110 ("If a candidate of a political party nominated at the primary election dies, withdraws, resigns, becomes disqualified .”
Angela Craig v. Steve Simon, 978 F.3d 1043 (8th Cir. 2020). “3 The legislative record in Minnesota, however, suggests that the substitution of candidates as an election date approaches may be complicated by the need to reprogram accessible voting equipment required by the Help America Vote Act, 52 U.”
Alaska Democratic Party & Anita Thorne v. Dir. Carol Beecher, 572 P.3d 556 (Alaska 2025). · cites it 2× “2d 1132, 1133 (Alaska 1992); former AS 15.25.110 (1989). AS 15.25.110 was repealed by Ballot Measure 2.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.